The NLRB Changing Landscape: Repeal of SuperShuttle and Return to FedEx II Standard for Independent Contractor Classification

For many years, businesses have relied on independent contractors to handle various tasks, often in an effort to cut labor costs. However, as the gig economy continues to grow and more workers are classified as independent contractors, questions arise over their rights and legal protections. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has been at the forefront of this debate, working to distinguish between employees and independent contractors. This article will examine the NLRB’s recent decision to overrule the SuperShuttle decision and return to the FedEx II standard for determining independent contractor status.

The FedEx II Standard

In 2014, the NLRB set forth the FedEx II standard for determining whether workers are employees or independent contractors. Under this standard, the focus is on whether the worker has an entrepreneurial opportunity for gain or loss. In other words, if the worker has significant control over their work and can make decisions about how they perform their job, they are more likely to be considered an independent contractor.

Consideration of Common-Law Factors

Although the NLRB has returned to the FedEx II standard, it does not imply that common-law factors are irrelevant. Instead, the NLRB will assess and balance all of the traditional common-law factors when determining a worker’s status. These factors encompass the degree of control the employer possesses, the worker’s potential for profit or loss, and the payment method, among other factors.

Importance of Actual Entrepreneurial Opportunity

One of the key takeaways from the NLRB’s decision is the emphasis on actual, rather than theoretical, entrepreneurial opportunity. This means that workers must have a real opportunity to profit or lose based on their performance in order to be classified as independent contractors. Workers who are simply given the title of independent contractor, but have no control over their work or opportunity for profit or loss, are more likely to be considered employees.

Positive Reception of Decision

NLRB Chair Lauren McFerran praised the NLRB’s decision, stating that it will “ensure that workers who seek to organize or exercise their rights under the National Labor Relations Act are not improperly excluded from its protections.” This is a significant win for workers, especially those in the on-demand or sharing economy who have long struggled to secure labor rights and protections.

Protection of Workers’ Rights

The NLRB’s decision is a step in the right direction for protecting workers’ rights. By ensuring that workers are properly classified according to their level of control and opportunity for profit or loss, they can better advocate for their own interests and secure legal protections under the National Labor Relations Act. This is especially important for workers in industries such as ridesharing, delivery services, and other on-demand work.

Potential Challenge to Decision

While the NLRB’s new standard is certainly a win for workers, it may face challenges on appeal. Companies that rely on independent contractors may argue that the standard is too narrow and restricts their ability to maintain flexible work arrangements. However, the NLRB maintains that the new standard is necessary to ensure that workers are not unfairly misclassified and denied labor protections.

Implications for Companies

The NLRB’s decision has significant implications for companies that rely on independent contractors. These companies should review their applicable agreements in light of the new standard to ensure that they are properly classifying their workers. Companies that fail to properly classify their workers may face legal action and penalties.

In conclusion, the NLRB’s decision to return to the FedEx II standard for distinguishing employees from independent contractors is a significant win for workers. By prioritizing actual entrepreneurial opportunity and providing a clear standard for evaluation, workers can better advocate for their rights and secure legal protections under the National Labor Relations Act. Companies that rely on independent contractors must take note of these changes and ensure that they are properly classifying their workers to avoid legal troubles.

Explore more

Is 2026 the Year of 5G for Latin America?

The Dawning of a New Connectivity Era The year 2026 is shaping up to be a watershed moment for fifth-generation mobile technology across Latin America. After years of planning, auctions, and initial trials, the region is on the cusp of a significant acceleration in 5G deployment, driven by a confluence of regulatory milestones, substantial investment commitments, and a strategic push

EU Set to Ban High-Risk Vendors From Critical Networks

The digital arteries that power European life, from instant mobile communications to the stability of the energy grid, are undergoing a security overhaul of unprecedented scale. After years of gentle persuasion and cautionary advice, the European Union is now poised to enact a sweeping mandate that will legally compel member states to remove high-risk technology suppliers from their most critical

AI Avatars Are Reshaping the Global Hiring Process

The initial handshake of a job interview is no longer a given; for a growing number of candidates, the first face they see is a digital one, carefully designed to ask questions, gauge responses, and represent a company on a global, 24/7 scale. This shift from human-to-human conversation to a human-to-AI interaction marks a pivotal moment in talent acquisition. For

Recruitment CRM vs. Applicant Tracking System: A Comparative Analysis

The frantic search for top talent has transformed recruitment from a simple act of posting jobs into a complex, strategic function demanding sophisticated tools. In this high-stakes environment, two categories of software have become indispensable: the Recruitment CRM and the Applicant Tracking System. Though often used interchangeably, these platforms serve fundamentally different purposes, and understanding their distinct roles is crucial

Could Your Star Recruit Lead to a Costly Lawsuit?

The relentless pursuit of top-tier talent often leads companies down a path of aggressive courtship, but a recent court ruling serves as a stark reminder that this path is fraught with hidden and expensive legal risks. In the high-stakes world of executive recruitment, the line between persuading a candidate and illegally inducing them is dangerously thin, and crossing it can