The NLRB Changing Landscape: Repeal of SuperShuttle and Return to FedEx II Standard for Independent Contractor Classification

For many years, businesses have relied on independent contractors to handle various tasks, often in an effort to cut labor costs. However, as the gig economy continues to grow and more workers are classified as independent contractors, questions arise over their rights and legal protections. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has been at the forefront of this debate, working to distinguish between employees and independent contractors. This article will examine the NLRB’s recent decision to overrule the SuperShuttle decision and return to the FedEx II standard for determining independent contractor status.

The FedEx II Standard

In 2014, the NLRB set forth the FedEx II standard for determining whether workers are employees or independent contractors. Under this standard, the focus is on whether the worker has an entrepreneurial opportunity for gain or loss. In other words, if the worker has significant control over their work and can make decisions about how they perform their job, they are more likely to be considered an independent contractor.

Consideration of Common-Law Factors

Although the NLRB has returned to the FedEx II standard, it does not imply that common-law factors are irrelevant. Instead, the NLRB will assess and balance all of the traditional common-law factors when determining a worker’s status. These factors encompass the degree of control the employer possesses, the worker’s potential for profit or loss, and the payment method, among other factors.

Importance of Actual Entrepreneurial Opportunity

One of the key takeaways from the NLRB’s decision is the emphasis on actual, rather than theoretical, entrepreneurial opportunity. This means that workers must have a real opportunity to profit or lose based on their performance in order to be classified as independent contractors. Workers who are simply given the title of independent contractor, but have no control over their work or opportunity for profit or loss, are more likely to be considered employees.

Positive Reception of Decision

NLRB Chair Lauren McFerran praised the NLRB’s decision, stating that it will “ensure that workers who seek to organize or exercise their rights under the National Labor Relations Act are not improperly excluded from its protections.” This is a significant win for workers, especially those in the on-demand or sharing economy who have long struggled to secure labor rights and protections.

Protection of Workers’ Rights

The NLRB’s decision is a step in the right direction for protecting workers’ rights. By ensuring that workers are properly classified according to their level of control and opportunity for profit or loss, they can better advocate for their own interests and secure legal protections under the National Labor Relations Act. This is especially important for workers in industries such as ridesharing, delivery services, and other on-demand work.

Potential Challenge to Decision

While the NLRB’s new standard is certainly a win for workers, it may face challenges on appeal. Companies that rely on independent contractors may argue that the standard is too narrow and restricts their ability to maintain flexible work arrangements. However, the NLRB maintains that the new standard is necessary to ensure that workers are not unfairly misclassified and denied labor protections.

Implications for Companies

The NLRB’s decision has significant implications for companies that rely on independent contractors. These companies should review their applicable agreements in light of the new standard to ensure that they are properly classifying their workers. Companies that fail to properly classify their workers may face legal action and penalties.

In conclusion, the NLRB’s decision to return to the FedEx II standard for distinguishing employees from independent contractors is a significant win for workers. By prioritizing actual entrepreneurial opportunity and providing a clear standard for evaluation, workers can better advocate for their rights and secure legal protections under the National Labor Relations Act. Companies that rely on independent contractors must take note of these changes and ensure that they are properly classifying their workers to avoid legal troubles.

Explore more

Trend Analysis: AI in Real Estate

Navigating the real estate market has long been synonymous with staggering costs, opaque processes, and a reliance on commission-based intermediaries that can consume a significant portion of a property’s value. This traditional framework is now facing a profound disruption from artificial intelligence, a technological force empowering consumers with unprecedented levels of control, transparency, and financial savings. As the industry stands

Insurtech Digital Platforms – Review

The silent drain on an insurer’s profitability often goes unnoticed, buried within the complex and aging architecture of legacy systems that impede growth and alienate a digitally native customer base. Insurtech digital platforms represent a significant advancement in the insurance sector, offering a clear path away from these outdated constraints. This review will explore the evolution of this technology from

Trend Analysis: Insurance Operational Control

The relentless pursuit of market share that has defined the insurance landscape for years has finally met its reckoning, forcing the industry to confront a new reality where operational discipline is the true measure of strength. After a prolonged period of chasing aggressive, unrestrained growth, 2025 has marked a fundamental pivot. The market is now shifting away from a “growth-at-all-costs”

AI Grading Tools Offer Both Promise and Peril

The familiar scrawl of a teacher’s red pen, once the definitive symbol of academic feedback, is steadily being replaced by the silent, instantaneous judgment of an algorithm. From the red-inked margins of yesteryear to the instant feedback of today, the landscape of academic assessment is undergoing a seismic shift. As educators grapple with growing class sizes and the demand for

Legacy Digital Twin vs. Industry 4.0 Digital Twin: A Comparative Analysis

The promise of a perfect digital replica—a tool that could mirror every gear turn and temperature fluctuation of a physical asset—is no longer a distant vision but a bifurcated reality with two distinct evolutionary paths. On one side stands the legacy digital twin, a powerful but often isolated marvel of engineering simulation. On the other is its successor, the Industry