How New York City’s Anti-Discrimination Law for Height and Weight Could Benefit Diversity and Inclusion (D&I)

On Thursday, the New York City Council voted to pass a historic new law – Int. No. 209-2022-A – which is designed to ban employment discrimination based on a person’s weight or height. The law marks a major step forward in the fight against discrimination and is of special significance given the relatively few cities that have similar legislation. Only a handful of places in the United States outlaw height and weight discrimination – including Urbana, Illinois; Madison, Wisconsin; Binghamton, New York; San Francisco; Santa Cruz, California; and Washington, D.C.

The new law provides a comprehensive framework for addressing and preventing discrimination based on weight or height in the workplace. For example, it exempts employers who have to consider height or weight for essential job functions from the new regulations. While the bill doesn’t restrict employers from offering incentives for weight management as part of a voluntary wellness program, the law prohibits employers from refusing to hire or promote individuals based on their weight or height.

Other Cities’ Laws

While New York City’s law is groundbreaking, it is important to acknowledge that other cities have already outlawed weight discrimination. Some of the cities that have done so are Urbana, Illinois; Madison, Wisconsin; Binghamton, New York; San Francisco; Santa Cruz, California; and Washington, D.C. However, New York City’s law stands out as it is significantly more comprehensive than the laws in its counterparts elsewhere.

Increased Attention to Size Discrimination

As companies come to understand the negative impact that size discrimination has on their employees, there is increasing attention being paid to the problem. Studies have revealed how common it is for employees to report negative effects as a result of weight discrimination, in particular. Nearly 3 in 4 workers who said they had experienced such discrimination reported feeling that it made them want to resign—a reflection of the significant and far-reaching consequences of this type of discrimination.

Next steps in D&I work

Size discrimination is a complex issue, and it could well be the next frontier in the effort to eradicate workplace discrimination. It is a subject that is gaining traction in the drive for diversity and inclusion (D&I) in workplaces globally. D&I practices aim to create more diverse and inclusive spaces within which employees can operate, free of any form of discrimination, including weight discrimination.

Potential Impact of New York City Law

New York City’s decision to pass this law was significant not just because it was a bold move, but also because it is likely to encourage other US states to adopt similar laws. Massachusetts and New Jersey, for instance, are already discussing the possibility of introducing laws similar to New York’s new law. Additionally, passing this law in New York City sends a message that other cities and towns may also receive; the time for accepting or ignoring discrimination against any group of people is over.

The New York City law was supported by a vote of 44-5, which is in line with the strong support that advocates have received for similar causes. Although Mayor Eric Adams has not committed publicly to signing the bill, his office has encouraged its passage, and Councilmember Abreu is confident of his support. Given this support level, it is just a matter of time before this law becomes a reality.

The passage of the New York City bill marks an important moment for the D&I movement, and is likely to have significant consequences in the short and long term. By promoting a more inclusive workplace culture that eliminates discriminatory practices leading to discrimination against workers, this legislation serves as a beacon of hope for those seeking a more tolerant and accepting working environment. While this is just one step in a much broader movement, the passage of Int. No. 209-2022-A is undoubtedly a significant victory in the fight against workplace discrimination. It sends a powerful message that in the United States, where inclusivity and respect are valued, discrimination based on characteristics like size is unacceptable.

Explore more

Is 2026 the Year of 5G for Latin America?

The Dawning of a New Connectivity Era The year 2026 is shaping up to be a watershed moment for fifth-generation mobile technology across Latin America. After years of planning, auctions, and initial trials, the region is on the cusp of a significant acceleration in 5G deployment, driven by a confluence of regulatory milestones, substantial investment commitments, and a strategic push

EU Set to Ban High-Risk Vendors From Critical Networks

The digital arteries that power European life, from instant mobile communications to the stability of the energy grid, are undergoing a security overhaul of unprecedented scale. After years of gentle persuasion and cautionary advice, the European Union is now poised to enact a sweeping mandate that will legally compel member states to remove high-risk technology suppliers from their most critical

AI Avatars Are Reshaping the Global Hiring Process

The initial handshake of a job interview is no longer a given; for a growing number of candidates, the first face they see is a digital one, carefully designed to ask questions, gauge responses, and represent a company on a global, 24/7 scale. This shift from human-to-human conversation to a human-to-AI interaction marks a pivotal moment in talent acquisition. For

Recruitment CRM vs. Applicant Tracking System: A Comparative Analysis

The frantic search for top talent has transformed recruitment from a simple act of posting jobs into a complex, strategic function demanding sophisticated tools. In this high-stakes environment, two categories of software have become indispensable: the Recruitment CRM and the Applicant Tracking System. Though often used interchangeably, these platforms serve fundamentally different purposes, and understanding their distinct roles is crucial

Could Your Star Recruit Lead to a Costly Lawsuit?

The relentless pursuit of top-tier talent often leads companies down a path of aggressive courtship, but a recent court ruling serves as a stark reminder that this path is fraught with hidden and expensive legal risks. In the high-stakes world of executive recruitment, the line between persuading a candidate and illegally inducing them is dangerously thin, and crossing it can