In late 2022, when Elon Musk took the reins at Twitter, around 2,000 employees were let go from the company. Now, these former employees are demanding that Twitter honors its commitment to cover their severance pay and address any discrimination claims that arise. However, despite previously imposing arbitration on its employees, the company has refused to engage in arbitration in response to these demands, further exacerbating the situation.
Employee’s claim filed in court
Fabien Ho Ching Ma, a former Twitter employee, recently filed a claim in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. In his claim, he highlights Twitter’s refusal to participate in arbitration, despite having enforced arbitration on employees in the past. This demonstrates a double standard and raises concerns about Twitter’s commitment to fairness and accountability.
Employee Resignations and Severance Agreements
The aftermath of Musk’s takeover saw more than half of Twitter’s employees choosing to leave the company. They were faced with an ultimatum from Musk, requiring them to continue as “extremely hardcore” workers or to opt to resign. To address the concerns of those who chose to leave, Twitter assured them that their severance agreements would be upheld. However, the company has been slow to fulfill these commitments, contributing to mounting discontent among former employees.
Delay in meeting severance agreements
Despite Twitter’s promises to honor severance agreements, it appears that the company has been dragging its feet in processing these payments. Frustrated by the lack of action, former employees filed a petition to compel arbitration as a means of pushing Twitter to meet the terms of their severance agreements promptly. This legal action underscores the employees’ determination to hold Twitter accountable.
Twitter’s use of arbitration
Twitter has previously benefited from its insistence on arbitration, as it successfully convinced former employees to pursue arbitration instead of taking their cases to court. However, now that the tables have turned, and former employees are demanding their severance pay and resolution of discrimination claims, it seems that Twitter is reluctant to engage in arbitration, undermining its own stance on the matter.
Twitter’s stance on arbitration costs
One of the key issues at hand is Twitter’s refusal to bear the costs of arbitration. The company is now attempting to shift the burden onto former employees, insisting that they split the costs. Twitter claims it will cover arbitration expenses in some states, including California, Nevada, and Oregon. However, it has made it clear that it will not assume these costs in other states. This selective approach further contributes to the dissatisfaction among former employees as it appears that Twitter is avoiding accountability.
Twitter’s response to arbitration requests
In response to the demand for arbitration, Twitter has doubled down on its refusal to participate. The company explicitly stated that it would not arbitrate claims outside of California and provided a daunting list of almost 900 pending arbitrations that it refuses to cover. This response only serves to exacerbate tensions between Twitter and its former employees, as it demonstrates the company’s unwillingness to address their concerns.
Severance package terms
Under the terms of the merger agreement signed in April 2022 between Musk and Twitter, the company is obligated to provide certain benefits to laid-off employees who continued working during the transition. These benefits include two months of salary, accelerated vesting of restricted stock, prorated bonuses, and continued contributions to healthcare plans. Former employees are now demanding their rightful severance pay, considering these contractual obligations.
Twitter’s approach to arbitration expenses
Twitter’s attempt to involve former employees in covering half the cost of arbitration suggests that the company is beginning to realize the high expenses associated with this approach in resolving the claims at hand. By shifting the financial burden, Twitter appears to be trying to minimize its own financial responsibility.
As the clash between Twitter and its former employees continues, the situation highlights the dire need for transparency, fairness, and accountability within the tech industry. Twitter’s refusal to engage in arbitration and honor severance agreements underscores a lack of commitment to its workforce. The outcome of the demands made by the affected employees remains uncertain, but their legal actions reflect a strong determination to fight for their rights and ensure that they are treated fairly.