Navigating the McLaren Macomb Ruling: A New Era in Severance Agreements and the Impact on Employers and Employees

Severance agreements are often used by employers to ensure a smooth transition for employees who are leaving the company. These agreements typically include confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses that prohibit the employee from speaking negatively about the company or revealing confidential information. However, a recent decision by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has paved the way for employees to challenge the legality of these clauses.

Background on severance agreements and their use of non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions

Employers often offer severance agreements to departing employees to minimize the risk of litigation and protect their trade secrets and intellectual property. These agreements typically include non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions that prohibit the employee from speaking negatively about the company or revealing confidential information.

These clauses are designed to protect the company’s reputation and trade secrets, but they have been criticized for their chilling effect on employee speech. Employees may be reluctant to speak out about issues of concern if they fear retaliation or if their severance payments are contingent upon their silence.

McLaren decision and its impact on severance agreements

In February 2021, the NLRB issued a decision in the case of Raytheon Technologies Corp. and United Steelworkers, Local 12012, AFL-CIO, stating that conditioning severance agreements on the acceptance of non-disparagement and confidentiality terms is unlawful.

According to the Board, these clauses “interfere with employees’ Section 7 rights to engage in concerted activity for mutual aid or protection by limiting the information about the employer that the employee can share with others.” The Board also found that these clauses have a chilling effect on employees’ willingness to engage in protected activity.

Guidance for Employers on How to Comply with the McLaren Decision

The NLRB has provided guidance for employers on how to comply with the McLaren decision. Employers must review both their current and future severance agreements, as well as any agreements that could be deemed to infringe upon employees’ Section 7 rights.

The board will attempt to strike overbroad, violative provisions of severance agreements instead of invalidating entire agreements. Narrowly tailored confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions may still be considered lawful, but employers should ensure that they do not have a chilling effect on employee speech.

The NLRB is considering the potential extension of the McLaren decision to include severance agreements issued to supervisors under certain circumstances. If a supervisor is also an employee who engages in protected activity, their severance agreement may be subject to the same scrutiny as those agreements of non-supervisory employees.

The McLaren decision has a retroactive effect, so “maintaining and/or enforcing a previously entered severance agreement with unlawful provisions” will be considered a continuous violation and will, therefore, not be time-barred. Employers may be liable for violating the NLRA even if the agreement was signed before the McLaren decision.

Remedies for overbroad or violative provisions in severance agreements

The board will attempt to sever any overbroad or violative provisions in severance agreements instead of invalidating the entire agreement. Employers may be required to revise their severance agreements to remove any offending provisions.

Exceptions for narrowly tailored confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions

Narrowly tailored confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions may still be considered lawful. Employers should ensure that these clauses do not have a chilling effect on employee speech and that they are narrowly tailored to only protect the company’s legitimate business interests.

Discussion of protected activity under the NLRA, including conversations about race and racism:
The NLRB has also clarified that discussions about race and conversations regarding racism could be considered “concerted protected activity” under the NLRA. If an employee’s severance agreement prohibits them from discussing these issues, it may be deemed unlawful.

It is crucially important for employers to consider whether an employee has engaged in any protected activity before taking adverse action against them. This includes all employment laws, including the NLRA. If employers take adverse action based on protected activity, they may be held liable for violating employee rights.

The NLRB’s decision in McLaren carries significant implications for employers who frequently enter into severance agreements containing broad confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses. Employers must review their existing and future agreements in light of this decision and ensure that they do not impede employees’ Section 7 rights. The guidance provided by the Board offers employers a framework to comply with the ruling and minimize their liability.

Explore more

How Is AI Revolutionizing Payroll in HR Management?

Imagine a scenario where payroll errors cost a multinational corporation millions annually due to manual miscalculations and delayed corrections, shaking employee trust and straining HR resources. This is not a far-fetched situation but a reality many organizations faced before the advent of cutting-edge technology. Payroll, once considered a mundane back-office task, has emerged as a critical pillar of employee satisfaction

AI-Driven B2B Marketing – Review

Setting the Stage for AI in B2B Marketing Imagine a marketing landscape where 80% of repetitive tasks are handled not by teams of professionals, but by intelligent systems that draft content, analyze data, and target buyers with precision, transforming the reality of B2B marketing in 2025. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful force in this space, offering solutions

5 Ways Behavioral Science Boosts B2B Marketing Success

In today’s cutthroat B2B marketing arena, a staggering statistic reveals a harsh truth: over 70% of marketing emails go unopened, buried under an avalanche of digital clutter. Picture a meticulously crafted campaign—polished visuals, compelling data, and airtight logic—vanishing into the void of ignored inboxes and skipped LinkedIn posts. What if the key to breaking through isn’t just sharper tactics, but

Trend Analysis: Private Cloud Resurgence in APAC

In an era where public cloud solutions have long been heralded as the ultimate destination for enterprise IT, a surprising shift is unfolding across the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region, with private cloud infrastructure staging a remarkable comeback. This resurgence challenges the notion that public cloud is the only path forward, as businesses grapple with stringent data sovereignty laws, complex compliance requirements,

iPhone 17 Series Faces Price Hikes Due to US Tariffs

What happens when the sleek, cutting-edge device in your pocket becomes a casualty of global trade wars? As Apple unveils the iPhone 17 series this year, consumers are bracing for a jolt—not just from groundbreaking technology, but from price tags that sting more than ever. Reports suggest that tariffs imposed by the US on Chinese goods are driving costs upward,