Employers have a legal obligation to provide a safe and harassment-free workplace for their employees. This obligation includes monitoring and policing the music played in the workplace. Inappropriate music can create a hostile work environment and contribute to the development of a culture that tolerates sexual harassment. In this article, we will explore the case of Stephanie Sharp, who filed a lawsuit against her employer for failing to take action against the sexually explicit and violent music played in her workplace.
Please provide the description of Stephanie Sharp’s case
Stephanie Sharp worked at S&S and claimed that the sexually explicit and violent music played in the workplace created a hostile work environment. She argued that this music was a catalyst for abusive conduct by male employees who frequently made sexually explicit remarks, mimicked sexually suggestive gestures and shared pornographic videos. Despite repeated complaints, S&S took no action and defended the music as motivational.
Allegations of abusive conduct
Sharp’s lawsuit alleged that male employees were engaging in sexually explicit behavior due to the nature of the music played in the workplace. This behavior made it difficult for her and her fellow employees to focus on their work and created a toxic work environment. The prolonged exposure to such crude and abusive conduct made it evident that the work environment was unsafe and hostile.
S&S’s Lack of Action
Despite the repeated complaints received from employees about the sexually explicit and violent music, S&S took no action. They defended the music as motivating and believed that it improved employee productivity. The management at S&S was more interested in the bottom line than ensuring a harassment-free environment for its employees. This lack of action from the company contributed to the escalation of sexually harassing behavior in the workplace.
Lawsuit for Title VII Violation
Sharp and seven coworkers sued S&S for maintaining a sexually harassing work environment in violation of Title VII. The employees argued that the company failed to take appropriate action despite receiving multiple complaints.
The court held that harassment must be more than a one-off event and must be severe or pervasive to be considered unlawful. The sexually explicit and violent music played relentlessly in the workplace contributed to the creation of a hostile work environment. The prolonged exposure to such music led to the harassment of employees.
If the lyrics of a song are gender-specific and sufficiently offensive, courts around the country have found that music in the workplace may rise to the level of unlawful sexual harassment. In Stephanie Sharp’s case, the lyrics of the songs played in the workplace were explicit and violent, denigrated women, and described extreme violence against them.
The court’s ruling
The court rejected S&S’s arguments and held that prolonged exposure to sexually explicit and abusive music violates Title VII. It stated that the behavior of male employees, including making sexually suggestive gestures, sharing pornographic videos, and making explicit comments, was a result of the sexually explicit and violent music played in the workplace.
Equal Opportunity Harasser Argument
S&S defended itself by arguing that harassment affected both male and female employees, which made the conduct less unlawful. However, the court unequivocally rejected this argument, stating that harassment is harassment regardless of gender.
Employers must monitor and regulate the music played in their workplaces to ensure a harassment-free environment, and they must act promptly to end any harassing behavior. By allowing the playing of sexually explicit and violent music in the workplace, S&S created a hostile work environment that led to a lawsuit against the company. The court held that employers have a legal obligation to provide a harassment-free environment and that playing inappropriate music in the workplace is a violation of Title VII. S&S could have avoided the lawsuit and the negative publicity by simply enforcing a zero-tolerance policy against harassing behavior and inappropriate music in the workplace.