Gender Pay Gap Persists in Female-Dominated Jobs in the UK

Despite efforts to promote gender equality in the workplace over the past few decades, a recent analysis by HR and payroll software provider Ciphr reveals that the gender pay gap remains a significant issue in female-dominated occupations in the UK. This in-depth study, based on data from the Office for National Statistics, highlights that a staggering 70% of occupations primarily staffed by women still demonstrate a pay disparity favoring men. This sobering reality casts light on the systemic issues deeply ingrained within the remuneration structures of various industries.

Key Positions with Significant Pay Disparities

Office Managers and Marketing Managers

Among the many positions with notable gender pay disparities, office managers and marketing managers stand out with some of the highest differences. The analysis showed that these roles, significantly populated by women, have pay gaps ranging from 13.4% to 18.4% in favor of men. This statistic is particularly troubling when considering the essential functions these professionals perform within organizations.

In the case of office managers, who provide crucial administrative support and ensure smooth operations, the gender pay gap highlights the undervaluing of work typically done by women. Similarly, marketing managers, who play a vital role in driving companies’ growth and visibility, face similar disparities. These roles are held by approximately 380,700 women compared to 206,800 men, illustrating a clear discrepancy that needs addressing. The gender pay gap in these positions not only affects individual income but also reflects broader issues of gender inequality in career advancement and opportunities.

Solicitors and Financial Accounts Managers

Further compounding the issue, gender pay disparities are prevalent among solicitors and financial accounts managers, both key roles in the professional services sector. These positions show that even highly skilled and professional occupations are not immune to gender-based pay discrepancies. Women in these roles often face a more challenging career path and experience slower progression compared to their male counterparts.

The study found that while men and women may start their careers at similar earning levels, gaps widen significantly over time due to various systemic factors, such as biases in promotions or access to career-advancing projects. As a result, female solicitors and financial accounts managers can find themselves earning significantly less than their male peers. The compounded impact of these disparities can have long-term detrimental consequences, including lower lifetime earnings and reduced pension benefits, ultimately affecting financial independence and stability for many women.

Persistent Gaps in Female-Dominated Jobs

Office Administrators and Clerical Assistants

In roles traditionally dominated by female employees, such as office administrators and clerical assistants, the gender pay gap persists stubbornly. A detailed examination of these occupations reveals that women make up 78% of the workforce in these positions, yet they still face a 4.7% gender pay gap. These findings suggest that gender pay inequality is deeply entrenched even in sectors where women form the majority.

This persistent gap can be attributed to several factors, including job valuation practices, gendered perceptions of occupational worth, and historical biases. Despite women occupying these roles in large numbers, their work is often undervalued compared to their male counterparts in similar positions. Such disparities highlight the need for organizations to regularly review and reassess their pay structures to ensure fair compensation for all employees, regardless of gender.

Overall Employment Landscape

The broader employment landscape also reflects ongoing challenges in achieving gender pay equity. On average, the hourly pay gap across all jobs is 13.1% in favor of men, encompassing both male-dominated and gender-balanced roles. A staggering three-quarters of all occupations continue to have a gender pay gap, with 82% of these gaps occurring in male-dominated fields and 85% in gender-balanced positions. This extensive prevalence of pay discrepancies underscores the systemic nature of the issue and the necessity for widespread, proactive measures to address it.

Addressing Systemic Issues

Expert Insights and Recommendations

According to Claire Williams, Ciphr’s chief people and operations officer, the persistent gender pay gap can be attributed to systemic issues within recruitment, career progression, and salary review practices. Williams asserts that addressing these issues requires a concerted effort from employers to actively reassess and refine their practices. Organizations must commit to conducting regular diversity and pay audits, even if they are not legally required to do so. Such audits enable employers to identify disparities and focus on areas in need of improvement, fostering a fair and equitable work environment.

Actionable Measures for Employers

Actionable Measures for Employers Despite efforts to promote gender equality in the workplace over the past few decades, a recent analysis by HR and payroll software provider Ciphr reveals that the gender pay gap remains a significant issue in female-dominated occupations in the UK. This comprehensive study, drawing on data from the Office for National Statistics, underscores the concerning reality that a staggering 70% of occupations where women are the majority still reflect a pay disparity that favors men. The findings of this analysis shed light on the deep-rooted systemic issues in the remuneration structures of various industries, implicating that gender-based income inequality remains persistent and challenging to eradicate. Such insights call for a renewed focus on addressing these entrenched disparities to create a more equitable workforce. Once considered a waning problem, it’s clear that the gender pay gap in female-dominated fields continues to be a profound and persistent hurdle. The ongoing inequality underscores the necessity for more robust measures to achieve true workplace equity.

Explore more

Is 2026 the Year of 5G for Latin America?

The Dawning of a New Connectivity Era The year 2026 is shaping up to be a watershed moment for fifth-generation mobile technology across Latin America. After years of planning, auctions, and initial trials, the region is on the cusp of a significant acceleration in 5G deployment, driven by a confluence of regulatory milestones, substantial investment commitments, and a strategic push

EU Set to Ban High-Risk Vendors From Critical Networks

The digital arteries that power European life, from instant mobile communications to the stability of the energy grid, are undergoing a security overhaul of unprecedented scale. After years of gentle persuasion and cautionary advice, the European Union is now poised to enact a sweeping mandate that will legally compel member states to remove high-risk technology suppliers from their most critical

AI Avatars Are Reshaping the Global Hiring Process

The initial handshake of a job interview is no longer a given; for a growing number of candidates, the first face they see is a digital one, carefully designed to ask questions, gauge responses, and represent a company on a global, 24/7 scale. This shift from human-to-human conversation to a human-to-AI interaction marks a pivotal moment in talent acquisition. For

Recruitment CRM vs. Applicant Tracking System: A Comparative Analysis

The frantic search for top talent has transformed recruitment from a simple act of posting jobs into a complex, strategic function demanding sophisticated tools. In this high-stakes environment, two categories of software have become indispensable: the Recruitment CRM and the Applicant Tracking System. Though often used interchangeably, these platforms serve fundamentally different purposes, and understanding their distinct roles is crucial

Could Your Star Recruit Lead to a Costly Lawsuit?

The relentless pursuit of top-tier talent often leads companies down a path of aggressive courtship, but a recent court ruling serves as a stark reminder that this path is fraught with hidden and expensive legal risks. In the high-stakes world of executive recruitment, the line between persuading a candidate and illegally inducing them is dangerously thin, and crossing it can