Closing Gender Pay Gap: WGEA Pushes for Systemic Change in Workplaces

The Workplace Gender Equality Agency (WGEA) has issued a clarion call to employers, urging a deeper understanding of the gender pay gap and its underlying causes to effectively close it. This call was particularly emphasized on Equal Pay Day, which brings attention to the additional 50 days women in Australia must work into the new financial year to match the previous year’s average male earnings. According to WGEA CEO Mary Wooldridge, paying men and women equally for the same work is insufficient; a true resolution requires addressing broader systemic issues that perpetuate this inequity.

Contributors to the Gender Pay Gap

Gender Discrimination

WGEA’s extensive research has identified that gender discrimination accounts for 36% of the gender pay gap. This form of discrimination manifests in various ways, from biases in hiring and promotion practices to unequal access to training and development opportunities. Women often find themselves subjected to conscious or unconscious biases that limit their career progression and salary potential. By recognizing and addressing these biases, companies can make significant strides toward gender pay equity.

Wooldridge emphasizes that combating gender discrimination requires a multi-faceted approach. It’s not just about creating policies but also about fostering an inclusive culture that values diversity and ensures equal opportunities for everyone. Employers must educate their staff, implement unbiased recruitment processes, and establish transparent promotion criteria. Furthermore, regular audits and reviews of pay structures can help identify and eliminate discrepancies rooted in discriminatory practices.

Care and Family Responsibilities

Another significant contributor, accounting for 33% of the gender pay gap, is care and family responsibilities. Women are often the primary caregivers, which can limit their availability for higher-paying roles that demand long hours or extensive travel. This caregiving responsibility often leads women to accept part-time or flexible roles that may offer lower pay and fewer advancement opportunities. Addressing this issue requires a cultural shift within organizations to value and support work-life balance for all employees, regardless of gender.

Employers can play a pivotal role in this transformation by offering flexible working arrangements, parental leave policies, and support programs for caregivers. These measures not only benefit female employees but also contribute to a more balanced and productive workforce. Encouraging men to take on more caregiving responsibilities can also help redistribute the burden, allowing women to pursue their career goals without compromising their earnings potential.

Gender Segregation by Job Type and Industry

Gender segregation by job type and industry contributes 24% to the gender pay gap. Women are overrepresented in lower-paid roles and industries, such as education and healthcare, while being underrepresented in higher-paying sectors like technology and finance. This segregation is often rooted in societal norms and stereotypes that guide career choices from a young age. Overcoming this barrier requires a concerted effort to challenge these norms and create pathways for women to enter and thrive in male-dominated fields.

Educational initiatives aimed at encouraging girls and young women to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) can help bridge this gap. Additionally, mentorship and sponsorship programs within organizations can provide women with the support and guidance needed to advance in these industries. Employers should also evaluate their hiring practices and actively seek to diversify their talent pool, ensuring that women have equal opportunities to attain higher-paying positions.

Addressing the Pay Gap

Current Statistics and Ongoing Challenges

Despite progress, the latest data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics shows that the gender pay gap persists, with women earning just 89 cents for every dollar earned by men. This translates to $231.50 less per week, or $12,038 annually. Wooldridge highlights that the current national gender pay gap sits at a record low of 11.5%, but this should not be a reason for complacency. Achieving true gender pay equity requires sustained efforts and a commitment to ongoing improvements.

Moreover, 63% of employers still have a gender pay gap that favors men by more than five percent. WGEA aims for gaps within +/- 5% as a benchmark for more equitable hiring practices. This benchmark serves as a tangible goal for organizations to work towards and is an essential step in creating a fair and equitable workplace. Employers must regularly review and analyze their pay structures, making necessary adjustments to ensure that all employees are compensated fairly for their work.

Resources and Government Mandates

The Workplace Gender Equality Agency (WGEA) is urging employers to better understand the gender pay gap and its root causes in a bid to eliminate it. This call was highlighted on Equal Pay Day, which marks the extra 50 days women in Australia must work into the new financial year to earn what men did in the previous year. Mary Wooldridge, CEO of WGEA, pointed out that simply paying men and women equally for the same job isn’t enough. True change necessitates a deeper dive into the systemic issues that sustain this inequality.

Employers need to recognize that the gender pay gap isn’t solely about equal pay for equal work; it’s often rooted in broader workplace policies and practices. Factors like unequal access to career advancement, disparities in bonuses and other incentives, and even unconscious bias play significant roles. To address these issues, organizations should commit to comprehensive audits of their pay structures, actively work to eliminate biases, and promote a culture of transparency and inclusivity. Only by tackling these systemic problems can we hope to see a genuine and lasting closure of the gender pay gap.

Explore more

AI Avatars Are Reshaping the Global Hiring Process

The initial handshake of a job interview is no longer a given; for a growing number of candidates, the first face they see is a digital one, carefully designed to ask questions, gauge responses, and represent a company on a global, 24/7 scale. This shift from human-to-human conversation to a human-to-AI interaction marks a pivotal moment in talent acquisition. For

Is Your Hiring Funnel Actually a Leaky Bucket?

An unprecedented volume of applications is pouring into company systems, yet a growing number of new hires are simultaneously heading for the exits within their first year. This paradox defines the turbulent waters of the talent market, a landscape where the sheer number of job seekers masks a deeper crisis of retention and a fundamental shift in workplace dynamics. HR

Why Employee Silence Is More Dangerous Than Dissent

A conference room full of nodding heads and unanimous agreement is often viewed as the hallmark of an effective leadership meeting, but this quiet consensus can mask a far more insidious problem than open debate. This illusion of alignment frequently conceals a landscape of strategic silence, a deliberate withholding of crucial information, insights, and warnings by employees who have learned

Is Energy-Awareness the New Key Leadership Skill?

The feeling of walking away from a complex strategic discussion invigorated, contrasted with the profound exhaustion that follows a seemingly simple operational meeting, reveals an often-overlooked dynamic at the heart of modern leadership. This variance is not rooted in the topic’s difficulty but in the unseen current of energy that shapes how work is truly experienced. Long before a single

AI Makes Hiring Smarter, Faster, and Fairer

The long-held reliance on intuition and manual processes in talent acquisition is rapidly giving way to a more sophisticated, data-driven methodology powered by artificial intelligence. What was once considered an experimental tool on the periphery of human resources has now become an indispensable component of the modern hiring workflow. The pressures on recruitment teams have never been greater; they are