US Department of Labor Implements Stricter Penalties for Child Labor Violations

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) recently made an important announcement on November 28th, signaling a significant change in its approach to addressing child labor violations. The department will now assess child labor civil monetary penalties on a per-violation basis, a decision that aims to strengthen enforcement efforts and enhance the protection of underage workers. This article delves into the details of this change, its scope, the enforcement of child labor laws, and the implications it carries for employers.

Details of the change

The change primarily applies to non-serious injury and non-injury violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. By assessing penalties on a per violation basis, the Department of Labor (DOL) intends to fully utilize its statutory and regulatory authority when dealing with child labor violations. This move allows for a more comprehensive approach to addressing each violation individually, rather than aggregating them into a single penalty assessment. Furthermore, penalties levied will be subject to the maximum statutory cap, set at $15,138 per violation.

Scope of the change

To avoid undue burden, the change specifically applies to injuries necessitating treatment no more extensive than first aid. Additionally, the consequences of the violation must result in missed school or work, as well as curtailed normal activities, for a period of fewer than five days. When assessing penalties, the Department of Labor (DOL) will take into account the size of the business and various gravity factors associated with the violation. This ensures that penalties are appropriately tailored to the severity of the violation and the capacity of the violating entity.

Enforcement of child labor laws

The DOL has been highly proactive in enforcing child labor laws throughout the year, with notable penalties being imposed across various industries. To highlight one example, the department recently announced that Wisconsin-based Packer Sanitation Services Inc. paid over $1 million in penalties for child labor violations. These actions reflect the DOL’s commitment to cracking down on businesses that exploit underage workers and disregard labor laws.

Increase in violations and penalties

Alarming statistics show a substantial rise in child labor violations compared to the same point in 2022, with violations increasing by a staggering 44%. Notably, imposed penalties have also seen a significant increase, climbing by 87%. These numbers underscore the importance of stricter penalties and the need for enhanced enforcement to effectively curb child labor abuses. The DOL’s decision to assess penalties on a per-violation basis demonstrates determination to address this concerning upward trend and protect the rights and well-being of child workers.

Implications for Employers

While some state and local governments have relaxed child labor restrictions, employers must remain vigilant when it comes to training, safety, and compliance concerns. Stricter penalties imposed by the Department of Labor (DOL) place additional responsibility on businesses to prioritize the well-being of their employees and ensure compliance with child labor laws. Employers must invest in comprehensive training programs, establish robust safety protocols, and remain up-to-date with the evolving legal landscape to avoid penalties and protect underage workers from exploitation.

With the implementation of per-violation penalties for child labor violations, the U.S. Department of Labor strengthens its ability to enforce the Fair Labor Standards Act and protect minors from workplace exploitation. By assessing penalties based on the severity of each violation, the DOL aims to hold businesses accountable and prevent the continued rise of child labor violations. Employers must take heed of these developments, prioritize compliance, and foster safe and fair working conditions for all employees, particularly minors, to mitigate the risk of penalties and contribute to a more equitable labor landscape.

Explore more

Is 2026 the Year of 5G for Latin America?

The Dawning of a New Connectivity Era The year 2026 is shaping up to be a watershed moment for fifth-generation mobile technology across Latin America. After years of planning, auctions, and initial trials, the region is on the cusp of a significant acceleration in 5G deployment, driven by a confluence of regulatory milestones, substantial investment commitments, and a strategic push

EU Set to Ban High-Risk Vendors From Critical Networks

The digital arteries that power European life, from instant mobile communications to the stability of the energy grid, are undergoing a security overhaul of unprecedented scale. After years of gentle persuasion and cautionary advice, the European Union is now poised to enact a sweeping mandate that will legally compel member states to remove high-risk technology suppliers from their most critical

AI Avatars Are Reshaping the Global Hiring Process

The initial handshake of a job interview is no longer a given; for a growing number of candidates, the first face they see is a digital one, carefully designed to ask questions, gauge responses, and represent a company on a global, 24/7 scale. This shift from human-to-human conversation to a human-to-AI interaction marks a pivotal moment in talent acquisition. For

Recruitment CRM vs. Applicant Tracking System: A Comparative Analysis

The frantic search for top talent has transformed recruitment from a simple act of posting jobs into a complex, strategic function demanding sophisticated tools. In this high-stakes environment, two categories of software have become indispensable: the Recruitment CRM and the Applicant Tracking System. Though often used interchangeably, these platforms serve fundamentally different purposes, and understanding their distinct roles is crucial

Could Your Star Recruit Lead to a Costly Lawsuit?

The relentless pursuit of top-tier talent often leads companies down a path of aggressive courtship, but a recent court ruling serves as a stark reminder that this path is fraught with hidden and expensive legal risks. In the high-stakes world of executive recruitment, the line between persuading a candidate and illegally inducing them is dangerously thin, and crossing it can