University of Chicago-Affiliated Research Center Settles Discrimination Allegations with Asian Job Applicants

A research center affiliated with the University of Chicago, known as the National Opinion Research Center (NORC), has reached a settlement with the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) following allegations of discrimination against more than 100 Asian job applicants. The settlement includes the payment of $95,000 in back pay and interest, as announced by the DOL on Monday. This development sheds light on the importance of fair hiring practices and equal employment opportunities, particularly during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Allegations of discrimination

NORC has been accused of discriminatory practices towards applicants seeking positions as coronavirus contact tracers between May 2020 and August 2023. The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs conducted a compliance evaluation, which found evidence of discriminatory actions by the research center. The evaluation revealed disparities and bias against Asian job applicants during the hiring process.

Review of hiring practices

As part of the settlement agreement, NORC will undergo a comprehensive review of its hiring practices and procedures. This review aims to identify any potential biases or barriers that may hinder equal employment opportunities. Furthermore, the organization will implement training programs targeting managers, supervisors, and other officials involved in the hiring decision-making process. The goal is to ensure that future hiring practices are fair, transparent, and free from discriminatory practices.

Legal framework

The DOL cited Executive Order 11246, established by former President Lyndon Johnson in 1965, which prohibits employment discrimination based on various factors such as race, sex, color, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. This order serves as a fundamental legal framework to protect individuals from discrimination and promote equal employment opportunities.

Context of discrimination

The settlement with NORC comes at a time when civil rights agencies, including the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), have raised concerns about the rise in workplace harassment, intimidation, and discrimination against Asian, Asian American, and Pacific Islander individuals. The COVID-19 pandemic has unfortunately fueled xenophobia and prejudice, making it crucial to address these issues and create safe working environments for all.

NORC’s Previous Work

NORC’s involvement in this discrimination case is particularly noteworthy due to its previous collaborations with the EEOC. In 2019, the EEOC contracted NORC to collect pay data as part of the agency’s EEO-1 Component 2 for fiscal years 2017 and 2018. The collected data was subsequently analyzed by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, which published its findings last year. The involvement of NORC in collecting and analyzing employment data adds to the significance of addressing any discriminatory practices within the organization.

Importance of the Conciliation Agreement

This settlement agreement emphasizes the commitment to upholding the terms of NORC’s federal contract, which includes providing all applicants with equal employment opportunities. It further underlines the importance of examining and auditing employment processes to remove any barriers that could inhibit fair and equitable hiring practices. Holding organizations accountable to these provisions ensures that discriminatory practices are identified and rectified promptly.

The settlement between NORC and the DOL serves as a significant step towards rectifying discrimination allegations and promoting equal employment opportunities. By addressing biases and implementing comprehensive reviews and training initiatives, NORC aims to create a more inclusive workplace environment. The case serves as a reminder to other organizations to prioritize diversity, equity, and inclusion, particularly during times of crisis when vulnerable populations can be targeted. By actively working to eliminate discrimination, organizations can foster an environment that values and respects the contributions of individuals from diverse backgrounds.

Explore more

How to Choose the Best B2B Manufacturing Data Providers for 2026?

Success in the high-stakes world of industrial sales currently depends more on the surgical precision of contact information than on the sheer volume of outbound messages sent to potential buyers. In the manufacturing sector of 2026, the traditional spray-and-pray marketing methodology has been rendered obsolete by a buyer landscape that is more technical, fragmented, and protective of its time than

Is HubSpot Shifting from SaaS to an Agentic AI Platform?

The quiet clicks of manual data entry are fading into the background as the software industry undergoes its most significant transformation since the invention of the cloud itself. For decades, the Customer Relationship Management (CRM) space functioned primarily as a digital filing cabinet, requiring immense human effort to maintain data hygiene and relevance. However, recent developments at the Fall ’26

Can Salesforce Maintain Reliability in an AI-Driven Future?

The intricate machinery of global commerce ground to an unexpected halt when a single login service bottleneck effectively silenced the digital nerves of thousands of major corporations. For a platform that serves as the primary operational hub for the world’s most influential enterprises, such a disruption was more than a technical glitch; it was a profound illustration of the vulnerability

Digital Marketing Evolution From Content To Deals

The relentless pursuit of viral fame has left many modern corporations with impressive digital footprints but surprisingly empty bank accounts as they realize attention without conversion is merely a costly hobby. In the current economic climate, the traditional divide between the creative spark of marketing and the hard reality of sales has become an expensive relic of the past. Companies

Why Is ABM a Strategy Rather Than a Tactic?

Many marketing executives today mistakenly believe that deploying a set of targeted banner ads to a specific list of accounts fulfills the requirements of a sophisticated growth strategy. This misconception reduces a comprehensive go-to-market model to a mere series of tactical maneuvers, ignoring the architectural shifts required to drive meaningful revenue. When Account-Based Marketing (ABM) is executed as a series