University of Chicago-Affiliated Research Center Settles Discrimination Allegations with Asian Job Applicants

A research center affiliated with the University of Chicago, known as the National Opinion Research Center (NORC), has reached a settlement with the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) following allegations of discrimination against more than 100 Asian job applicants. The settlement includes the payment of $95,000 in back pay and interest, as announced by the DOL on Monday. This development sheds light on the importance of fair hiring practices and equal employment opportunities, particularly during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Allegations of discrimination

NORC has been accused of discriminatory practices towards applicants seeking positions as coronavirus contact tracers between May 2020 and August 2023. The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs conducted a compliance evaluation, which found evidence of discriminatory actions by the research center. The evaluation revealed disparities and bias against Asian job applicants during the hiring process.

Review of hiring practices

As part of the settlement agreement, NORC will undergo a comprehensive review of its hiring practices and procedures. This review aims to identify any potential biases or barriers that may hinder equal employment opportunities. Furthermore, the organization will implement training programs targeting managers, supervisors, and other officials involved in the hiring decision-making process. The goal is to ensure that future hiring practices are fair, transparent, and free from discriminatory practices.

Legal framework

The DOL cited Executive Order 11246, established by former President Lyndon Johnson in 1965, which prohibits employment discrimination based on various factors such as race, sex, color, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. This order serves as a fundamental legal framework to protect individuals from discrimination and promote equal employment opportunities.

Context of discrimination

The settlement with NORC comes at a time when civil rights agencies, including the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), have raised concerns about the rise in workplace harassment, intimidation, and discrimination against Asian, Asian American, and Pacific Islander individuals. The COVID-19 pandemic has unfortunately fueled xenophobia and prejudice, making it crucial to address these issues and create safe working environments for all.

NORC’s Previous Work

NORC’s involvement in this discrimination case is particularly noteworthy due to its previous collaborations with the EEOC. In 2019, the EEOC contracted NORC to collect pay data as part of the agency’s EEO-1 Component 2 for fiscal years 2017 and 2018. The collected data was subsequently analyzed by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, which published its findings last year. The involvement of NORC in collecting and analyzing employment data adds to the significance of addressing any discriminatory practices within the organization.

Importance of the Conciliation Agreement

This settlement agreement emphasizes the commitment to upholding the terms of NORC’s federal contract, which includes providing all applicants with equal employment opportunities. It further underlines the importance of examining and auditing employment processes to remove any barriers that could inhibit fair and equitable hiring practices. Holding organizations accountable to these provisions ensures that discriminatory practices are identified and rectified promptly.

The settlement between NORC and the DOL serves as a significant step towards rectifying discrimination allegations and promoting equal employment opportunities. By addressing biases and implementing comprehensive reviews and training initiatives, NORC aims to create a more inclusive workplace environment. The case serves as a reminder to other organizations to prioritize diversity, equity, and inclusion, particularly during times of crisis when vulnerable populations can be targeted. By actively working to eliminate discrimination, organizations can foster an environment that values and respects the contributions of individuals from diverse backgrounds.

Explore more

A Unified Framework for SRE, DevSecOps, and Compliance

The relentless demand for continuous innovation forces modern SaaS companies into a high-stakes balancing act, where a single misconfigured container or a vulnerable dependency can instantly transform a competitive advantage into a catastrophic system failure or a public breach of trust. This reality underscores a critical shift in software development: the old model of treating speed, security, and stability as

AI Security Requires a New Authorization Model

Today we’re joined by Dominic Jainy, an IT professional whose work at the intersection of artificial intelligence and blockchain is shedding new light on one of the most pressing challenges in modern software development: security. As enterprises rush to adopt AI, Dominic has been a leading voice in navigating the complex authorization and access control issues that arise when autonomous

How to Perform a Factory Reset on Windows 11

Every digital workstation eventually reaches a crossroads in its lifecycle, where persistent errors or a change in ownership demands a return to its pristine, original state. This process, known as a factory reset, serves as a definitive solution for restoring a Windows 11 personal computer to its initial configuration. It systematically removes all user-installed applications, personal data, and custom settings,

What Will Power the New Samsung Galaxy S26?

As the smartphone industry prepares for its next major evolution, the heart of the conversation inevitably turns to the silicon engine that will drive the next generation of mobile experiences. With Samsung’s Galaxy Unpacked event set for the fourth week of February in San Francisco, the spotlight is intensely focused on the forthcoming Galaxy S26 series and the chipset that

Is Leadership Fear Undermining Your Team?

A critical paradox is quietly unfolding in executive suites across the industry, where an overwhelming majority of senior leaders express a genuine desire for collaborative input while simultaneously harboring a deep-seated fear of soliciting it. This disconnect between intention and action points to a foundational weakness in modern organizational culture: a lack of psychological safety that begins not with the