University of Chicago-Affiliated Research Center Settles Discrimination Allegations with Asian Job Applicants

A research center affiliated with the University of Chicago, known as the National Opinion Research Center (NORC), has reached a settlement with the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) following allegations of discrimination against more than 100 Asian job applicants. The settlement includes the payment of $95,000 in back pay and interest, as announced by the DOL on Monday. This development sheds light on the importance of fair hiring practices and equal employment opportunities, particularly during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Allegations of discrimination

NORC has been accused of discriminatory practices towards applicants seeking positions as coronavirus contact tracers between May 2020 and August 2023. The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs conducted a compliance evaluation, which found evidence of discriminatory actions by the research center. The evaluation revealed disparities and bias against Asian job applicants during the hiring process.

Review of hiring practices

As part of the settlement agreement, NORC will undergo a comprehensive review of its hiring practices and procedures. This review aims to identify any potential biases or barriers that may hinder equal employment opportunities. Furthermore, the organization will implement training programs targeting managers, supervisors, and other officials involved in the hiring decision-making process. The goal is to ensure that future hiring practices are fair, transparent, and free from discriminatory practices.

Legal framework

The DOL cited Executive Order 11246, established by former President Lyndon Johnson in 1965, which prohibits employment discrimination based on various factors such as race, sex, color, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. This order serves as a fundamental legal framework to protect individuals from discrimination and promote equal employment opportunities.

Context of discrimination

The settlement with NORC comes at a time when civil rights agencies, including the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), have raised concerns about the rise in workplace harassment, intimidation, and discrimination against Asian, Asian American, and Pacific Islander individuals. The COVID-19 pandemic has unfortunately fueled xenophobia and prejudice, making it crucial to address these issues and create safe working environments for all.

NORC’s Previous Work

NORC’s involvement in this discrimination case is particularly noteworthy due to its previous collaborations with the EEOC. In 2019, the EEOC contracted NORC to collect pay data as part of the agency’s EEO-1 Component 2 for fiscal years 2017 and 2018. The collected data was subsequently analyzed by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, which published its findings last year. The involvement of NORC in collecting and analyzing employment data adds to the significance of addressing any discriminatory practices within the organization.

Importance of the Conciliation Agreement

This settlement agreement emphasizes the commitment to upholding the terms of NORC’s federal contract, which includes providing all applicants with equal employment opportunities. It further underlines the importance of examining and auditing employment processes to remove any barriers that could inhibit fair and equitable hiring practices. Holding organizations accountable to these provisions ensures that discriminatory practices are identified and rectified promptly.

The settlement between NORC and the DOL serves as a significant step towards rectifying discrimination allegations and promoting equal employment opportunities. By addressing biases and implementing comprehensive reviews and training initiatives, NORC aims to create a more inclusive workplace environment. The case serves as a reminder to other organizations to prioritize diversity, equity, and inclusion, particularly during times of crisis when vulnerable populations can be targeted. By actively working to eliminate discrimination, organizations can foster an environment that values and respects the contributions of individuals from diverse backgrounds.

Explore more

Is 2026 the Year of 5G for Latin America?

The Dawning of a New Connectivity Era The year 2026 is shaping up to be a watershed moment for fifth-generation mobile technology across Latin America. After years of planning, auctions, and initial trials, the region is on the cusp of a significant acceleration in 5G deployment, driven by a confluence of regulatory milestones, substantial investment commitments, and a strategic push

EU Set to Ban High-Risk Vendors From Critical Networks

The digital arteries that power European life, from instant mobile communications to the stability of the energy grid, are undergoing a security overhaul of unprecedented scale. After years of gentle persuasion and cautionary advice, the European Union is now poised to enact a sweeping mandate that will legally compel member states to remove high-risk technology suppliers from their most critical

AI Avatars Are Reshaping the Global Hiring Process

The initial handshake of a job interview is no longer a given; for a growing number of candidates, the first face they see is a digital one, carefully designed to ask questions, gauge responses, and represent a company on a global, 24/7 scale. This shift from human-to-human conversation to a human-to-AI interaction marks a pivotal moment in talent acquisition. For

Recruitment CRM vs. Applicant Tracking System: A Comparative Analysis

The frantic search for top talent has transformed recruitment from a simple act of posting jobs into a complex, strategic function demanding sophisticated tools. In this high-stakes environment, two categories of software have become indispensable: the Recruitment CRM and the Applicant Tracking System. Though often used interchangeably, these platforms serve fundamentally different purposes, and understanding their distinct roles is crucial

Could Your Star Recruit Lead to a Costly Lawsuit?

The relentless pursuit of top-tier talent often leads companies down a path of aggressive courtship, but a recent court ruling serves as a stark reminder that this path is fraught with hidden and expensive legal risks. In the high-stakes world of executive recruitment, the line between persuading a candidate and illegally inducing them is dangerously thin, and crossing it can