Restrictions on the Horizon: New York Senate Passes Bill to Ban Employee Non-Compete Agreements

On June 7, 2023, the New York State Senate passed Bill No. S03100, which would impose a blanket ban on employee non-competition agreements in New York. This article outlines the details of the bill, including its definition of non-compete agreements, the private right of action for individuals subject to prohibited non-compete agreements, and the exemptions to the prohibition of non-compete agreements.

The definition of a “non-compete agreement,” according to The Bill, is any agreement or clause contained in any agreement between an employer and a covered individual that prohibits or restricts such covered individual from obtaining employment after the conclusion of employment with the employer. This would include provisions in employment contracts that restrict employees from working for a competitor or in the same industry after leaving their current employer.

The bill provides a private right of action for individuals who are subject to prohibited non-compete agreements against an employer that “seeks, requires, demands, or accepts a non-compete from any covered individual.” This means that employees who are prohibited from seeking employment following their termination due to a non-compete agreement can now sue their former employer for damages. The courts can order injunctive relief, liquidated damages of up to $10,000 per violation, and compensatory damages, including lost compensation and attorney’s fees and costs.

Exemptions to the Prohibition of Non-Compete Agreements

The bill explicitly states that it does not impact applicable laws governing agreements that establish a fixed term of service or prohibit the disclosure of trade secrets, confidential and proprietary client information, or the solicitation of clients of the employer that the individual learned about during employment. This means that employers can still protect their business interests by using non-disclosure agreements to prevent former employees from sharing proprietary information and trade secrets.

Status of the Bill

The bill still must pass in the New York State Assembly, and if passed, it will move to New York Governor Kathy Hochul who will have ten days to sign the bill into law or veto it. At this time, it is unclear whether Governor Hochul supports an outright ban on non-compete agreements, as proposed in the bill. Governor Hochul’s position on non-compete agreements is that she has supported limitations on them for low-wage employees in the past. Her position on the blanket ban proposed in the Bill remains unknown, but she is in favor of protecting employees’ rights and promoting a fair and competitive job market.

Emerging Trend in Limiting Non-Compete Agreements

This bill is part of a broader emerging trend in various states and the federal government that seeks to prohibit or limit employers’ use of non-compete agreements. The rationale behind this trend is to promote competition and reduce the likelihood of monopolies in the job market.

Future Updates on the Bill

We will continue to monitor the status of the bill and provide updates on further developments. If the bill becomes a law, it will have a significant impact on businesses in New York. Employers will need to adjust their hiring and employment policies to comply with the new law, which may require them to offer more generous compensation packages to attract and retain talented employees.

The New York State Senate’s passing of Bill No. S03100 is a significant step toward protecting employees’ rights and promoting a competitive job market. The bill’s definition of non-compete agreements, private right of action for individuals, and exemptions provide clear guidelines for employers to follow. As the trend toward limiting non-compete agreements continues, businesses in New York and beyond will need to adapt to new regulations and employee expectations to remain competitive and attract top talent.

Explore more

Is 2026 the Year of 5G for Latin America?

The Dawning of a New Connectivity Era The year 2026 is shaping up to be a watershed moment for fifth-generation mobile technology across Latin America. After years of planning, auctions, and initial trials, the region is on the cusp of a significant acceleration in 5G deployment, driven by a confluence of regulatory milestones, substantial investment commitments, and a strategic push

EU Set to Ban High-Risk Vendors From Critical Networks

The digital arteries that power European life, from instant mobile communications to the stability of the energy grid, are undergoing a security overhaul of unprecedented scale. After years of gentle persuasion and cautionary advice, the European Union is now poised to enact a sweeping mandate that will legally compel member states to remove high-risk technology suppliers from their most critical

AI Avatars Are Reshaping the Global Hiring Process

The initial handshake of a job interview is no longer a given; for a growing number of candidates, the first face they see is a digital one, carefully designed to ask questions, gauge responses, and represent a company on a global, 24/7 scale. This shift from human-to-human conversation to a human-to-AI interaction marks a pivotal moment in talent acquisition. For

Recruitment CRM vs. Applicant Tracking System: A Comparative Analysis

The frantic search for top talent has transformed recruitment from a simple act of posting jobs into a complex, strategic function demanding sophisticated tools. In this high-stakes environment, two categories of software have become indispensable: the Recruitment CRM and the Applicant Tracking System. Though often used interchangeably, these platforms serve fundamentally different purposes, and understanding their distinct roles is crucial

Could Your Star Recruit Lead to a Costly Lawsuit?

The relentless pursuit of top-tier talent often leads companies down a path of aggressive courtship, but a recent court ruling serves as a stark reminder that this path is fraught with hidden and expensive legal risks. In the high-stakes world of executive recruitment, the line between persuading a candidate and illegally inducing them is dangerously thin, and crossing it can