Navigating the PUMP Act: Ensuring Compliance and Supporting Nursing Employees in the Workplace

The PUMP Act, which stands for the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act’s Update to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), was signed into law on December 27, 2020. The law expanded the break time requirements for employers to provide nursing employees with reasonable break times to pump breast milk. The Department of Labor (DOL) recently released new guidance to help employers understand and comply with the law.

PUMP Act Enforcement

The Department of Labor (DOL) began enforcing the PUMP Act last month, and it is essential that employers understand their obligations to avoid potential penalties. Employers who fail to comply with the law may face consequences such as civil fines and lawsuits.

Break Time Requirements

The PUMP Act requires employers to provide nursing employees with reasonable break times each time an employee needs to pump breast milk. The break time should be long enough for the employee to express milk and should take place during the workday. The timing and frequency of break time will depend on the employee’s individual needs and may change over time.

Fixed schedules

Employers may work with employees to agree on a general schedule based on anticipated needs, but they cannot require an employee to adhere to a fixed schedule that doesn’t meet the employee’s need for a break each time they need to pump. Therefore, an employer must offer flexibility in scheduling to ensure compliance with the PUMP Act.

Remote employees

Nursing employees who are working remotely are entitled to the same pumping breaks as employees working on-site. Remote workers should have access to a private space to pump, and employers should work with employees to ensure they have time and space to express milk while working remotely.

Payment Requirements

Under the PUMP Act, employees do not need to be paid for break time needed to express milk, “unless otherwise required by federal or state law or municipal ordinance.” This means that if federal or state law, such as the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), requires employers to pay employees for break time, they must do so.

Completely relieved from duty

If an employee is not completely relieved of their job duties during the entirety of the break, it must be paid. In other words, if an employee is required to check emails or perform other job duties during their break, they must be paid for that time.

Access to Private Space

The PUMP Act and DOL guidance require nursing employees to have access to a place to pump at work that is shielded from view, free from intrusion from co-workers and the public, available each time it is needed by the employee, and not a bathroom. The private space should have sufficient space and electrical outlets to operate a breast pump and other necessary equipment.

Employers must ensure that they comply with the PUMP Act and DOL guidance by providing reasonable break time for employees to pump breast milk. It is essential to provide both permanent and temporary private spaces for nursing employees to pump, and employers must collaborate with their employees to ensure that those spaces provide adequate privacy, comfort, and convenience. Employers who fail to meet the requirements under the PUMP Act may face penalties and costly lawsuits. Therefore, it is vital that employers fully understand their obligations and take necessary measures to ensure compliance.

Explore more

Signed Contract Does Not Establish Employment Relationship

A signed employment agreement often feels like the definitive closing of a chapter for a job seeker, providing a sense of security and a formal entry into a new professional environment. For many, the ink on the page represents the literal birth of an employment relationship, carrying with it all the statutory protections and rights afforded by modern labor laws.

Court Backs Employer Rights After Union Decertification

Strengthening Employer Autonomy in the Decertification Process The legal boundaries governing when an employer can officially stop recognizing a union have long been a source of intense friction between corporate management and labor organizers. The recent ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in Midwest Division-RMC, LLC v. NLRB represents a pivotal moment in the landscape

Why Do Companies Punish Their Most Loyal Employees?

The modern professional landscape has birthed a unsettling phenomenon where a worker’s greatest asset—their willingness to go above and beyond—frequently becomes their most significant liability in the eyes of corporate management. This “loyalty trap” describes a systemic pattern where high-performing individuals are exploited for their dedication rather than rewarded with the advancement they have earned through their labor. As the

Is AI a Thinking Partner or Just a Productivity Tool?

The transition from treating generative artificial intelligence as a simple digital assistant to integrating it as a sophisticated cognitive collaborator represents the most significant shift in corporate strategy since the dawn of the internet age. While millions of professionals now have access to large language models, a comprehensive analysis of 1.4 million workplace interactions reveals that broad accessibility does not

Victoria Proposes Legal Right to Work From Home

The Victorian Government’s decision to codify a legal right to work from home marks a transformative moment in the history of Australian labor relations, fundamentally altering the traditional power balance between employer and employee. This landmark proposal, which aims to provide eligible workers the statutory entitlement to perform their duties remotely for at least two days each week, reflects a