Executives Take Pay Cuts to Protect Employees

In today’s challenging economic environment, exemplary leaders are essential for businesses to succeed. According to Kathleen Quinn Votaw, CEO of TalenTrust, a Denver-based recruiting and human capital consulting firm, exemplary leaders prioritize their people first, and taking a pay decrease to prevent job losses is a powerful demonstration of supporting their teams.

As companies navigate the current economic environment, employees prefer to move to a “thriving secure company” where they do not have to worry about salary reductions. However, decreasing compensation for any employee is not conducive to maintaining morale and retaining personnel, whatever their rank in an organization; it gives off a signal that everyone may be vulnerable eventually and some may contemplate seeking new opportunities. These effects of salary reductions can be far-reaching for a company’s morale and workforce.

In order to better understand the trends in executive pay and the effects it may have on employees, TalenTrust surveyed 3,000 executives in the U.S. and Canada to determine if they have taken a salary reduction in the past six months. The survey revealed that two-thirds of executives accepted a decrease in salary over the past six months, with the majority (94%) indicating it was to prevent or minimize layoffs. This suggests that executives have taken on responsibility and accountability for the wellbeing of their teams by taking a pay cut in order to prevent layoffs.

Gartner’s survey of over 10,000 employees last year found that 77% thought senior executives should be prepared to take a major pay cut before letting go of employees or adjusting their wages. This suggests that employees have come to expect senior leaders to take a pay cut before reducing their staff or wages. It is important for executives to understand the expectations from their teams and be willing to take an active role in protecting their team members from layoffs and salary reductions, as well as demonstrating solidarity with their teams in these difficult times.

However, executives must also be mindful of how taking a pay cut could impact them personally and their families. Executives should consider how much pay cut they are willing to take on, as well as the long-term financial implications. Additionally, executives should also think about how other employees may view them if they take a pay cut while others don’t, and how this could potentially impact morale and productivity.

Ultimately, exemplary leaders prioritize their people first, and taking a pay decrease to prevent job losses is a powerful demonstration of supporting their teams. The survey results demonstrate that two-thirds of executives accepted a decrease in salary over the past six months, with the majority doing so in order to prevent or minimize layoffs. Additionally, Gartner’s survey found that 77% of employees thought senior executives should take a pay cut before reducing their staff or wages. This suggests that employees have come to expect senior leaders to take a pay cut before reducing their staff or wages.

As businesses continue to navigate the current economic environment, exemplary leaders must prioritize their people first while taking necessary steps to ensure the success of their organizations. It is essential for executives to understand the implications of taking a pay cut on themselves as well as on their team members and overall morale of the organization. Taking into consideration all aspects of this decision is key for making sure that any action taken is in the best interest of both the company and its employees.

Explore more

Is 2026 the Year of 5G for Latin America?

The Dawning of a New Connectivity Era The year 2026 is shaping up to be a watershed moment for fifth-generation mobile technology across Latin America. After years of planning, auctions, and initial trials, the region is on the cusp of a significant acceleration in 5G deployment, driven by a confluence of regulatory milestones, substantial investment commitments, and a strategic push

EU Set to Ban High-Risk Vendors From Critical Networks

The digital arteries that power European life, from instant mobile communications to the stability of the energy grid, are undergoing a security overhaul of unprecedented scale. After years of gentle persuasion and cautionary advice, the European Union is now poised to enact a sweeping mandate that will legally compel member states to remove high-risk technology suppliers from their most critical

AI Avatars Are Reshaping the Global Hiring Process

The initial handshake of a job interview is no longer a given; for a growing number of candidates, the first face they see is a digital one, carefully designed to ask questions, gauge responses, and represent a company on a global, 24/7 scale. This shift from human-to-human conversation to a human-to-AI interaction marks a pivotal moment in talent acquisition. For

Recruitment CRM vs. Applicant Tracking System: A Comparative Analysis

The frantic search for top talent has transformed recruitment from a simple act of posting jobs into a complex, strategic function demanding sophisticated tools. In this high-stakes environment, two categories of software have become indispensable: the Recruitment CRM and the Applicant Tracking System. Though often used interchangeably, these platforms serve fundamentally different purposes, and understanding their distinct roles is crucial

Could Your Star Recruit Lead to a Costly Lawsuit?

The relentless pursuit of top-tier talent often leads companies down a path of aggressive courtship, but a recent court ruling serves as a stark reminder that this path is fraught with hidden and expensive legal risks. In the high-stakes world of executive recruitment, the line between persuading a candidate and illegally inducing them is dangerously thin, and crossing it can