The invisible framework ensuring seamless global internet connectivity has undergone a significant transformation, with tech giants gaining unprecedented control over its foundational elements. Subsea cables and Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites form the backbone of this infrastructure, carrying the bulk of internet traffic and extending connectivity to remote regions. However, this shift from traditional telecom-operated systems to those under major corporations like Meta, Google, and Amazon raises pressing concerns about internet resilience, openness, and human rights. As private entities consolidate their control, the traditional mechanisms that ensured a free and open internet are increasingly being undermined, posing new challenges and opportunities for digital rights advocates.
Dynamics of Infrastructure Control
Impact of Subsea Cable Ownership
Subsea cables, carrying 99% of global internet traffic, are crucial for international communications. Traditionally managed by telecom consortia, these systems are now predominantly controlled by tech giants who hold the financial capacity and strategic interest to dominate traffic flows. Corporations like Google exemplify this trend, owning more than 30 subsea cable routes worldwide. This significant shift in ownership has implications not only for data flow management but also for access to diverse and competitive services. The dominance of tech companies in this domain raises concerns that infrastructure control could disproportionately favor commercial interests over public benefits. Such consolidation might marginalize smaller national providers and reduce the efficacy of governmental and regulatory oversight, impacting global internet governance and policies centered on equitable access.
Expanding Role of LEO Satellites
Low Earth Orbit satellites have emerged as a vital component of internet infrastructure, especially in underserved regions. The sector is experiencing explosive growth, with its market valuation projected to increase substantially over the next several years. Starlink, operated by SpaceX, currently dominates this sphere, while Amazon’s Project Kuiper is poised for rapid expansion. Such developments promise increased accessibility and innovation in global internet connectivity but also introduce new vulnerabilities related to ownership concentration. Excessive control by a few entities could shape internet connectivity in ways that diminish diversity and competition among service providers, thereby impacting the fundamental openness of the internet. Furthermore, the rapid expansion in satellite systems necessitates careful consideration regarding regulatory frameworks and standards that ensure equitable access and prevent potential monopolization.
Human Rights Implications
Consequences on Digital Rights
The concentration of internet infrastructure control by tech giants has significant ramifications on digital rights, particularly concerning freedom of expression and access to information. As proprietary interests surpass public considerations, there is a growing risk of the internet veering away from its intended status as a public domain. Such dynamics could lead to increased surveillance, censorship, and commercial prioritization over universal access and user rights. The implications reach beyond the technical sphere, touching on fundamental human rights debates and the democratic fabric that the internet supports. Ensuring a balanced governance model where civil society, governmental bodies, and private entities collaborate is essential to maintaining an internet that respects diverse societal needs and fosters inclusivity.
Advocacy for Resilient Infrastructure
Due to the concerns surrounding corporate dominance over infrastructure, initiatives like ARTICLE 19 have intensified their advocacy efforts. They actively engage in international forums and research the impacts of infrastructure ownership on human rights, aiming to reclaim internet architecture for the public interest. By strategically addressing the regulatory and technical dimensions, these efforts focus on ensuring subsea cables and satellite technologies remain open, resilient, and aligned with rights-respecting principles. Such advocacy promotes a collaborative approach, drawing expertise from diverse sectors to build a comprehensive understanding and response to infrastructure challenges. Empowering stakeholders through dialogue and informed actions is critical to safeguarding the internet as a platform for innovation, openness, and equitable access.
Looking Ahead
Future Implications and Collaborative Solutions
The path forward for internet infrastructure governance lies in fostering a collaborative environment where diverse interests are balanced. Through active monitoring, engagement, and advocacy, organizations are working to sustain the internet’s potential as a robust, rights-respecting platform. As infrastructure continues to evolve, addressing digital rights and public interest remains paramount. Ensuring informed discussions around policy frameworks and technological advancements can help navigate the challenges posed by concentrated corporate control. Collaborative actions among stakeholders, including civil society, industry leaders, and regulators, are vital to safeguarding the internet’s foundational freedoms and ensuring its alignment with democratic ideals.
Sustaining Internet Freedom and Resilience
The invisible framework that ensures seamless global internet connectivity has significantly transformed, with tech giants now wielding unprecedented control over its foundational elements. The internet’s backbone consists of subsea cables and Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites, facilitating most internet traffic and spreading connectivity to far-flung areas. The shift from traditional telecom-operated systems to those controlled by major corporations like Meta, Google, and Amazon raises critical concerns about internet resilience, openness, and human rights. As private entities strengthen their grip, conventional mechanisms guaranteeing a free and open internet are fading, bringing both new challenges and opportunities for digital rights advocates. This centralization prompts a need to rethink how to maintain a balanced internet landscape that supports global connectivity while safeguarding privacy and access for all, encouraging discussions on the future of digital autonomy.