Should You Choose Make to Order or Make to Stock in Manufacturing?

Article Highlights
Off On

In the highly competitive landscape of modern manufacturing, businesses must strategically choose the most effective production model to meet customer demands, manage resources, and drive profitability. Make to Order (MTO) and Make to Stock (MTS) are two prevalent manufacturing strategies, each offering distinct advantages and challenges. The decision to adopt either MTO or MTS can significantly impact cash flow, lead times, and the configuration of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems. Using Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, manufacturers can efficiently manage both approaches by tailoring their systems to optimize production and inventory management.

Understanding the Basics of Make to Order (MTO)

Customization and Inventory Control

Make to Order (MTO) is a production strategy primarily focused on manufacturing goods only after receiving a customer’s order. This approach is especially beneficial for industries that deal with customized products or high-value items where holding inventory would be cost-prohibitive. For instance, in a custom wood flooring business, products are manufactured specifically based on individual customer specifications. This ensures that each product is unique and aligns closely with what the customer desires, thus adding significant value through personalization. One of the main advantages of MTO is the ability to minimize inventory levels. As products are only produced in response to actual orders, there is no need to maintain a large stock of finished goods. This translates to lower inventory holding costs and reduces the risk of obsolescence or excess stock. However, the trade-off for minimizing inventory is often longer lead times, as production starts only after an order is placed. Customers may experience delays while their products are being manufactured, which necessitates managing expectations and maintaining clear communication to ensure customer satisfaction.

Impact on Cash Flow and Operations

From a financial perspective, MTO can positively impact cash flow management. Since production is directly tied to customer orders, companies are likely to receive payment before or immediately after the goods are produced, enhancing liquidity and reducing the need for large working capital. This approach also allows for more accurate production forecasting, as businesses only manufacture what has been explicitly ordered, reducing waste and inefficiencies.

However, implementing MTO requires robust planning and operational efficiency. Manufacturers must have a flexible and responsive supply chain to quickly procure raw materials and initiate production. The ability to ramp up production capacity on short notice is also crucial to meet customer demands without compromising on quality or delivery timelines. Utilizing Business Central, manufacturers can streamline their operations by integrating planning tools, order management, and supply chain coordination. This ensures that each step, from order receipt to production and delivery, is optimized for efficiency and accuracy.

Exploring the Make to Stock (MTS) Model

Inventory and Demand Forecasting

Make to Stock (MTS) is a production strategy where goods are manufactured in advance based on forecasted demand and then held in inventory until orders are received. This model is particularly effective for standardized products or items with predictable demand patterns. For example, in the case of fast-moving consumer goods like packaged foods or basic electronic components, maintaining an inventory allows businesses to fulfill customer orders promptly, enhancing service levels and customer satisfaction. One of the key benefits of MTS is the ability to offer shorter lead times. Since products are readily available in stock, customers can receive their orders quickly, boosting overall sales and market competitiveness. However, this approach requires accurate demand forecasting to ensure that the right amount of inventory is produced and maintained. Overproduction can lead to excess inventory, increased holding costs, and potential obsolescence, while underproduction can result in stockouts and missed sales opportunities.

Financial and Operational Considerations

MTS impacts cash flow differently compared to MTO. With MTS, businesses need to invest in inventory upfront, which ties up working capital. Effective inventory management and planning are essential to balance this investment and ensure that inventory turnover remains high. Sophisticated ERP systems like Business Central offer powerful tools to help businesses forecast demand accurately, manage inventory levels, and optimize production schedules.

Operationally, MTS requires a stable and efficient production process. Manufacturers must have the capacity to produce large volumes of goods consistently and maintain high-quality standards. Additionally, storage facilities need to be adequately managed to house finished goods until they are dispatched. Business Central supports these operational needs by providing functionalities for real-time inventory tracking, automated replenishment, and comprehensive reporting, enabling manufacturers to maintain optimal stock levels and respond adaptively to market fluctuations.

Strategic Implementation in Business Central

Balancing MTO and MTS Approaches

Many manufacturers find value in adopting a hybrid approach that combines elements of both MTO and MTS. This strategy allows businesses to balance the benefits of customization and rapid fulfillment by categorizing products based on demand patterns and production feasibility. For instance, a company might choose to make high-value, specialized items to order while keeping standardized, high-demand products in stock. Business Central offers the flexibility to support this hybrid model effectively. Utilizing Stockkeeping Units (SKUs), companies can configure their ERP systems to manage different products using tailored replenishment strategies. This allows for location-based planning where certain items can be stocked in one warehouse and made to order in another, optimizing inventory distribution and meeting customer requirements efficiently. This approach ensures that the production and inventory management processes are aligned with market dynamics and business goals.

Leveraging Advanced Planning Tools

Business Central provides various advanced planning tools that aid in refining MTO and MTS operations. For MTO, order-based planning features enable manufacturers to plan production schedules around confirmed orders, ensuring resources are allocated efficiently. For MTS, strategies like fixed reorder quantities and lot-for-lot planning help maintain optimal inventory levels and reduce waste. Additionally, incorporating safety stock and defined planning periods ensures that inventory levels can absorb fluctuations in demand without causing disruptions. These planning tools, coupled with detailed analytics and reporting functions, allow manufacturers to make data-driven decisions. By continuously monitoring performance metrics and market trends, companies can adjust their production strategies proactively and maintain flexibility in their operations. The capability to respond to changes swiftly and effectively positions manufacturers to achieve sustainable growth and maintain competitive advantage.

Planning for the Future

In the dynamic manufacturing environment, the choice between Make to Order and Make to Stock is not static. It requires ongoing evaluation and adaptation to market conditions, technological advancements, and customer preferences. By leveraging the capabilities of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, manufacturers can seamlessly integrate these strategies into their operations and achieve superior results.

The subsequent insights in this series will delve into specific reordering policies within Business Central, offering a nuanced understanding of how to optimize production planning further. It will cover the implementation of safety stock, effective use of planning periods, and the adaptation of different reordering strategies based on product demand and business goals. Manufacturers equipped with the right tools and strategies can navigate the complexities of MTO and MTS, capitalizing on their strengths while mitigating their challenges. The flexibility and robustness of Business Central empower manufacturers to streamline their operations, enhance customer satisfaction, and achieve long-term success in a competitive market.

Key Takeaways and Future Considerations

In today’s highly competitive manufacturing landscape, companies must strategically select the most efficient production model to satisfy customer demands, manage resources, and enhance profitability. Two commonly used manufacturing strategies are Make to Order (MTO) and Make to Stock (MTS), each having its own set of benefits and challenges. Choosing between MTO and MTS can substantially influence cash flow, lead times, and the setup of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems. With Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, manufacturers can adeptly handle both strategies by customizing their systems to streamline production and inventory management processes. MTO focuses on producing goods only after receiving customer orders, minimizing excess inventory, but potentially increasing lead times. On the other hand, MTS involves producing products based on projected demand, ensuring quick delivery but risking overproduction. Balancing these approaches with a tailored ERP system like Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central can greatly enhance efficiency and responsiveness in meeting market demands.

Explore more

How AI Agents Work: Types, Uses, Vendors, and Future

From Scripted Bots to Autonomous Coworkers: Why AI Agents Matter Now Everyday workflows are quietly shifting from predictable point-and-click forms into fluid conversations with software that listens, reasons, and takes action across tools without being micromanaged at every step. The momentum behind this change did not arise overnight; organizations spent years automating tasks inside rigid templates only to find that

AI Coding Agents – Review

A Surge Meets Old Lessons Executives promised dazzling efficiency and cost savings by letting AI write most of the code while humans merely supervise, but the past months told a sharper story about speed without discipline turning routine mistakes into outages, leaks, and public postmortems that no board wants to read. Enthusiasm did not vanish; it matured. The technology accelerated

Open Loop Transit Payments – Review

A Fare Without Friction Millions of riders today expect to tap a bank card or phone at a gate, glide through in under half a second, and trust that the system will sort out the best fare later without standing in line for a special card. That expectation sits at the heart of Mastercard’s enhanced open-loop transit solution, which replaces

OVHcloud Unveils 3-AZ Berlin Region for Sovereign EU Cloud

A Launch That Raised The Stakes Under the TV tower’s gaze, a new cloud region stitched across Berlin quietly went live with three availability zones spaced by dozens of kilometers, each with its own power, cooling, and networking, and it recalibrated how European institutions plan for resilience and control. The design read like a utility blueprint rather than a tech

Can the Energy Transition Keep Pace With the AI Boom?

Introduction Power bills are rising even as cleaner energy gains ground because AI’s electricity hunger is rewriting the grid’s playbook and compressing timelines once thought generous. The collision of surging digital demand, sharpened corporate strategy, and evolving policy has turned the energy transition from a marathon into a series of sprints. Data centers, crypto mines, and electrifying freight now press