Samsung Galaxy A56 vs S24 FE: Comparing Specs and Features

Article Highlights
Off On

In a market crowded with options, Samsung’s Galaxy A56 and S24 FE stand out by offering distinct experiences in the competitive mid-range smartphone segment. Consumers often find themselves choosing between devices based on key priorities such as performance, camera quality, and value for money. The Galaxy A56, a star in Samsung’s renewed A series lineup, and the S24 FE, a model designed to deliver premium features at a lower cost, each present unique advantages tailored to varying consumer needs. Exploring the nuanced differences between these smartphones can provide valuable insights for buyers seeking the best match for their requirements.

Design and Build

Design and build quality play a crucial role in how users perceive and interact with their phones daily. The A56 is crafted to be 0.6mm thinner and 15g lighter than the S24 FE, potentially offering a more comfortable hold for extended use. This model adopts a modern design aesthetic characterized by a curvier frame with a brushed metal finish, providing a sleek and contemporary look. Conversely, the S24 FE presents a more understated approach.

Constructed with durability in mind, both smartphones employ aluminum frames and Gorilla Glass Victus+ to withstand everyday wear and tear, including accidental drops. Despite this shared commitment to resilience, the S24 FE holds a distinct advantage with its IP68 rating, ensuring protection against dust ingress and submersion in water up to 1.5 meters. These design choices underscore the individual priorities that each model fulfills, aligning with the preferences of style-conscious and practical users alike.

Display Characteristics

Visual experience remains a critical aspect of smartphone functionality, and both the Galaxy A56 and S24 FE deliver robust display capabilities. Each model features a 6.7-inch panel with a 1080p resolution that ensures crisp and vibrant picture quality, suitable for streaming and browsing. HDR10+ support is standard across both devices, amplifying the quality of media consumption through improved color accuracy and contrast.

Despite these similarities, the S24 FE edges slightly ahead with its higher maximum brightness level. Ultimately, both the A56 and S24 FE ensure an engaging visual platform capable of meeting the diverse demands of multimedia enthusiasts.

Battery Life and Charging

The Galaxy A56 boasts a 5,000mAh battery, which provides a slight edge over the S24 FE’s 4,700mAh power source. Despite the former’s higher capacity, real-world performance places them in close competition, with both delivering commendable active use times. Notably, the A56 shines in scenarios involving extensive web browsing and video playback, outperforming the S24 FE by delivering longer durations.

Conversely, the S24 FE demonstrates superior battery endurance in gaming, lasting 24% longer than its counterpart. Charging capabilities mirror the active performance differences, with the A56 utilizing a 45W system to reach a higher level of quick recharge. Meanwhile, the S24 FE, with a lower 25W capability, compensates by integrating wireless charging.

Audio Performance

Audio quality certainly enriches the user experience, and both the Galaxy A56 and S24 FE are equipped with stereo speakers positioned strategically. While both phones provide good audio delivery, the S24 FE distinguishes itself by achieving a slightly higher loudness level. Despite these enhancements, the distinctions in loudness and sound dynamics are unlikely to be the sole factors in deciding between the two models.

Performance

Raw performance capabilities remain the heart of any smartphone, deeply influencing user satisfaction across varying tasks. The Galaxy A56 is equipped with the Exynos 1580 chipset, while the S24 FE uses the cutting-edge Exynos 2400e, which closely approaches flagship performance levels. Benchmark tests highlight the S24 FE’s superiority, showcasing twice the central processing unit’s capabilities and tripling the graphical performance over the A56. This remarkable advantage establishes the S24 FE as an ideal choice for gaming aficionados.

Software and Updates

Software longevity and update commitments heavily influence consumer decisions, especially in a rapidly evolving tech landscape. The Galaxy A56 launches with Android 15, complemented by a promise of six years of software updates. Meanwhile, the S24 FE begins life on Android 14 but extends support for seven years. These update timelines ensure both devices remain relevant and secure, accommodating a wide range of evolving software requirements across their lifespan.

Camera Capabilities

Capturing memories through photography is an integral element for many smartphone users, and the cameras of the Galaxy A56 and S24 FE present clear differences. The S24 FE includes an 8MP zoom unit, enabling a 3x optical zoom that excels in snapping distant subjects with clarity — a notable tool absent in the A56’s configuration.

Both smartphones house a 50MP main camera with optical image stabilization and a 12MP ultrawide lens. The S24 FE’s main camera yields superior sharpness in bright conditions, making it a strong contender for daylight photography.

Low-light Photography and Video Quality

In low-light photography, subtle variances emerge further differentiating the capabilities of the Galaxy A56 and S24 FE. The A56 exhibits a clear advantage through its ability to render cleaner images and a wider dynamic range when auto mode is engaged. Meanwhile, the S24 FE’s 2x zoom option provides enhanced detail. Both models excel in video quality using their main lenses.

Verdict

In a market teeming with various options, Samsung’s Galaxy A56 and S24 FE distinguish themselves by providing unique experiences within the competitive mid-range smartphone category. The Galaxy A56 excels with its excellent balance of performance and affordability, appealing to users who prioritize efficient day-to-day operations and solid build quality. On the other hand, the S24 FE is tailored for those seeking a more high-end experience without the accompanying high cost. By delving into the subtle yet significant differences between the Galaxy A56 and S24 FE, potential buyers can gain insightful knowledge to help them decide which device best suits their lifestyle and needs.

Explore more

Is 2026 the Year of 5G for Latin America?

The Dawning of a New Connectivity Era The year 2026 is shaping up to be a watershed moment for fifth-generation mobile technology across Latin America. After years of planning, auctions, and initial trials, the region is on the cusp of a significant acceleration in 5G deployment, driven by a confluence of regulatory milestones, substantial investment commitments, and a strategic push

EU Set to Ban High-Risk Vendors From Critical Networks

The digital arteries that power European life, from instant mobile communications to the stability of the energy grid, are undergoing a security overhaul of unprecedented scale. After years of gentle persuasion and cautionary advice, the European Union is now poised to enact a sweeping mandate that will legally compel member states to remove high-risk technology suppliers from their most critical

AI Avatars Are Reshaping the Global Hiring Process

The initial handshake of a job interview is no longer a given; for a growing number of candidates, the first face they see is a digital one, carefully designed to ask questions, gauge responses, and represent a company on a global, 24/7 scale. This shift from human-to-human conversation to a human-to-AI interaction marks a pivotal moment in talent acquisition. For

Recruitment CRM vs. Applicant Tracking System: A Comparative Analysis

The frantic search for top talent has transformed recruitment from a simple act of posting jobs into a complex, strategic function demanding sophisticated tools. In this high-stakes environment, two categories of software have become indispensable: the Recruitment CRM and the Applicant Tracking System. Though often used interchangeably, these platforms serve fundamentally different purposes, and understanding their distinct roles is crucial

Could Your Star Recruit Lead to a Costly Lawsuit?

The relentless pursuit of top-tier talent often leads companies down a path of aggressive courtship, but a recent court ruling serves as a stark reminder that this path is fraught with hidden and expensive legal risks. In the high-stakes world of executive recruitment, the line between persuading a candidate and illegally inducing them is dangerously thin, and crossing it can