NIST Deprioritizes Pre-2018 CVEs Amid Backlog and New Threats

Article Highlights
Off On

The US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) recently made a significant decision affecting the cybersecurity landscape by marking all Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) published before January 1, 2018, as “Deferred” in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). This move impacts over 20,000 entries and potentially up to 100,000, signaling that these CVEs will no longer be prioritized for further enrichment data updates unless they appear in the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency’s (CISA) Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. NIST’s decision comes in response to an ongoing struggle with a growing backlog in processing vulnerability data, exacerbated by a 32% surge in submissions in the past year.

An Overwhelming Backlog and Strategic Reprioritization

NIST’s challenges in processing and enriching the vast amount of incoming data have delayed its goal of clearing the backlog by the end of fiscal year 2024. In response, NIST is developing new systems to handle these issues more efficiently. Industry experts consider this move practical given the complexities of managing vulnerabilities at scale. Ken Dunham from Qualys describes it as an evolution in the face of changing cyber threats. Meanwhile, Jason Soroko from Sectigo interprets this as a strategic reprioritization, with resources redirected towards addressing emerging threats, assuming that legacy issues have been mitigated through routine patch management practices. The responsibility for managing deferred CVEs now shifts more heavily onto organizations. For security teams, this means identifying and monitoring legacy systems, prioritizing the patching of deferred vulnerabilities, and hardening or segmenting outdated infrastructure. Using real-time threat intelligence to detect attempts at exploiting these vulnerabilities becomes crucial. This shift highlights a broader trend where organizations must adopt proactive risk management strategies due to the increasing volume of CVEs and limited resources available to handle them.

Embracing Advanced Technology for Improved Efficiency

In addressing its backlog, NIST is also exploring the potential use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to streamline the processing of vulnerability data. This move reflects an ongoing trend in the cybersecurity industry toward leveraging advanced technologies for more efficient management of vulnerabilities. By incorporating AI and machine learning, NIST aims to ensure that both older and newer vulnerabilities receive appropriate attention within the constraints of available resources. This nuanced approach to cybersecurity management underscores the need for a balance between addressing legacy vulnerabilities and staying ahead of emerging threats. Organizations are encouraged to adopt similar strategies, using technology to enhance their cybersecurity efforts and ensure comprehensive coverage of potential vulnerabilities. This shift in focus not only addresses immediate backlog issues but also sets the stage for more sustainable and scalable vulnerability management practices in the future.

New Paradigm for Cybersecurity Management

The US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has recently made a crucial decision that impacts the cybersecurity domain by designating all Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) published before January 1, 2018, as “Deferred” in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). This adjustment affects over 20,000 entries and potentially up to 100,000, indicating that these CVEs will no longer receive prioritized updates for enrichment data unless they are listed in the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency’s (CISA) Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. NIST’s decision is a response to an ongoing challenge with a growing accumulation of vulnerability data, which has been aggravated by a 32% increase in submissions over the past year. This strategic shift aims to address the backlog more effectively and allocate resources more efficiently, ensuring newer and more critical vulnerabilities receive the attention they require for maintaining robust cybersecurity measures.

Explore more

Trend Analysis: Employee Learning Capital Management

The traditional perception of professional development as a peripheral expense is rapidly dissolving as organizations recognize that intellectual agility is the most valuable form of liquidity in a modern economy. In an era defined by relentless technological disruption, the paradigm has shifted from viewing training as a sunk cost toward treating employee time as “Learning Capital.” This specific form of

Trend Analysis: Adaptive Leadership Development Pipelines

The rapid acceleration of global market volatility has fundamentally dismantled the efficacy of traditional leadership manuals, replacing them with a requirement for agile, behaviorally-focused development pipelines. In an era often described as a “permacrisis”—characterized by sudden legislative shifts, economic instability, and the pervasive integration of artificial intelligence—the legacy approach of “set-and-forget” training has transitioned from a stable asset to a

Future Corporate Learning – Review

The rapid erosion of specialized knowledge has turned the traditional corporate diploma into a relic, forcing a total reimagination of how professional competency is maintained in a high-velocity economy. What was once a static repository of instructional videos and compliance checklists has morphed into a sophisticated, interconnected engine designed for perpetual workforce readiness. This shift marks a departure from the

How Supportive Leadership Drives Employee Engagement

The relentless acceleration of the global digital economy has fundamentally shifted the balance of power from traditional corporate hierarchies toward a more collaborative and human-centric model of management. This transition marks a departure from rigid oversight, moving the industry toward empathy-based systems that prioritize the individual contributor as much as the final output. In an era defined by rapid technological

Emotional Intelligence Is the Main Driver of Career Success

The traditional corporate landscape often prioritizes technical prowess and cognitive intelligence above all else, yet modern organizational dynamics suggest that these attributes are merely the baseline for entry rather than the definitive catalysts for long-term professional growth. While a high Intelligence Quotient (IQ) might secure a position at a prestigious firm or provide the analytical tools necessary for complex problem-solving,