NIST Deprioritizes Pre-2018 CVEs Amid Backlog and New Threats

Article Highlights
Off On

The US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) recently made a significant decision affecting the cybersecurity landscape by marking all Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) published before January 1, 2018, as “Deferred” in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). This move impacts over 20,000 entries and potentially up to 100,000, signaling that these CVEs will no longer be prioritized for further enrichment data updates unless they appear in the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency’s (CISA) Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. NIST’s decision comes in response to an ongoing struggle with a growing backlog in processing vulnerability data, exacerbated by a 32% surge in submissions in the past year.

An Overwhelming Backlog and Strategic Reprioritization

NIST’s challenges in processing and enriching the vast amount of incoming data have delayed its goal of clearing the backlog by the end of fiscal year 2024. In response, NIST is developing new systems to handle these issues more efficiently. Industry experts consider this move practical given the complexities of managing vulnerabilities at scale. Ken Dunham from Qualys describes it as an evolution in the face of changing cyber threats. Meanwhile, Jason Soroko from Sectigo interprets this as a strategic reprioritization, with resources redirected towards addressing emerging threats, assuming that legacy issues have been mitigated through routine patch management practices. The responsibility for managing deferred CVEs now shifts more heavily onto organizations. For security teams, this means identifying and monitoring legacy systems, prioritizing the patching of deferred vulnerabilities, and hardening or segmenting outdated infrastructure. Using real-time threat intelligence to detect attempts at exploiting these vulnerabilities becomes crucial. This shift highlights a broader trend where organizations must adopt proactive risk management strategies due to the increasing volume of CVEs and limited resources available to handle them.

Embracing Advanced Technology for Improved Efficiency

In addressing its backlog, NIST is also exploring the potential use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to streamline the processing of vulnerability data. This move reflects an ongoing trend in the cybersecurity industry toward leveraging advanced technologies for more efficient management of vulnerabilities. By incorporating AI and machine learning, NIST aims to ensure that both older and newer vulnerabilities receive appropriate attention within the constraints of available resources. This nuanced approach to cybersecurity management underscores the need for a balance between addressing legacy vulnerabilities and staying ahead of emerging threats. Organizations are encouraged to adopt similar strategies, using technology to enhance their cybersecurity efforts and ensure comprehensive coverage of potential vulnerabilities. This shift in focus not only addresses immediate backlog issues but also sets the stage for more sustainable and scalable vulnerability management practices in the future.

New Paradigm for Cybersecurity Management

The US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has recently made a crucial decision that impacts the cybersecurity domain by designating all Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) published before January 1, 2018, as “Deferred” in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). This adjustment affects over 20,000 entries and potentially up to 100,000, indicating that these CVEs will no longer receive prioritized updates for enrichment data unless they are listed in the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency’s (CISA) Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. NIST’s decision is a response to an ongoing challenge with a growing accumulation of vulnerability data, which has been aggravated by a 32% increase in submissions over the past year. This strategic shift aims to address the backlog more effectively and allocate resources more efficiently, ensuring newer and more critical vulnerabilities receive the attention they require for maintaining robust cybersecurity measures.

Explore more

Is 2026 the Year of 5G for Latin America?

The Dawning of a New Connectivity Era The year 2026 is shaping up to be a watershed moment for fifth-generation mobile technology across Latin America. After years of planning, auctions, and initial trials, the region is on the cusp of a significant acceleration in 5G deployment, driven by a confluence of regulatory milestones, substantial investment commitments, and a strategic push

EU Set to Ban High-Risk Vendors From Critical Networks

The digital arteries that power European life, from instant mobile communications to the stability of the energy grid, are undergoing a security overhaul of unprecedented scale. After years of gentle persuasion and cautionary advice, the European Union is now poised to enact a sweeping mandate that will legally compel member states to remove high-risk technology suppliers from their most critical

AI Avatars Are Reshaping the Global Hiring Process

The initial handshake of a job interview is no longer a given; for a growing number of candidates, the first face they see is a digital one, carefully designed to ask questions, gauge responses, and represent a company on a global, 24/7 scale. This shift from human-to-human conversation to a human-to-AI interaction marks a pivotal moment in talent acquisition. For

Recruitment CRM vs. Applicant Tracking System: A Comparative Analysis

The frantic search for top talent has transformed recruitment from a simple act of posting jobs into a complex, strategic function demanding sophisticated tools. In this high-stakes environment, two categories of software have become indispensable: the Recruitment CRM and the Applicant Tracking System. Though often used interchangeably, these platforms serve fundamentally different purposes, and understanding their distinct roles is crucial

Could Your Star Recruit Lead to a Costly Lawsuit?

The relentless pursuit of top-tier talent often leads companies down a path of aggressive courtship, but a recent court ruling serves as a stark reminder that this path is fraught with hidden and expensive legal risks. In the high-stakes world of executive recruitment, the line between persuading a candidate and illegally inducing them is dangerously thin, and crossing it can