NIST Deprioritizes Pre-2018 CVEs Amid Backlog and New Threats

Article Highlights
Off On

The US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) recently made a significant decision affecting the cybersecurity landscape by marking all Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) published before January 1, 2018, as “Deferred” in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). This move impacts over 20,000 entries and potentially up to 100,000, signaling that these CVEs will no longer be prioritized for further enrichment data updates unless they appear in the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency’s (CISA) Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. NIST’s decision comes in response to an ongoing struggle with a growing backlog in processing vulnerability data, exacerbated by a 32% surge in submissions in the past year.

An Overwhelming Backlog and Strategic Reprioritization

NIST’s challenges in processing and enriching the vast amount of incoming data have delayed its goal of clearing the backlog by the end of fiscal year 2024. In response, NIST is developing new systems to handle these issues more efficiently. Industry experts consider this move practical given the complexities of managing vulnerabilities at scale. Ken Dunham from Qualys describes it as an evolution in the face of changing cyber threats. Meanwhile, Jason Soroko from Sectigo interprets this as a strategic reprioritization, with resources redirected towards addressing emerging threats, assuming that legacy issues have been mitigated through routine patch management practices. The responsibility for managing deferred CVEs now shifts more heavily onto organizations. For security teams, this means identifying and monitoring legacy systems, prioritizing the patching of deferred vulnerabilities, and hardening or segmenting outdated infrastructure. Using real-time threat intelligence to detect attempts at exploiting these vulnerabilities becomes crucial. This shift highlights a broader trend where organizations must adopt proactive risk management strategies due to the increasing volume of CVEs and limited resources available to handle them.

Embracing Advanced Technology for Improved Efficiency

In addressing its backlog, NIST is also exploring the potential use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to streamline the processing of vulnerability data. This move reflects an ongoing trend in the cybersecurity industry toward leveraging advanced technologies for more efficient management of vulnerabilities. By incorporating AI and machine learning, NIST aims to ensure that both older and newer vulnerabilities receive appropriate attention within the constraints of available resources. This nuanced approach to cybersecurity management underscores the need for a balance between addressing legacy vulnerabilities and staying ahead of emerging threats. Organizations are encouraged to adopt similar strategies, using technology to enhance their cybersecurity efforts and ensure comprehensive coverage of potential vulnerabilities. This shift in focus not only addresses immediate backlog issues but also sets the stage for more sustainable and scalable vulnerability management practices in the future.

New Paradigm for Cybersecurity Management

The US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has recently made a crucial decision that impacts the cybersecurity domain by designating all Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) published before January 1, 2018, as “Deferred” in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). This adjustment affects over 20,000 entries and potentially up to 100,000, indicating that these CVEs will no longer receive prioritized updates for enrichment data unless they are listed in the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency’s (CISA) Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. NIST’s decision is a response to an ongoing challenge with a growing accumulation of vulnerability data, which has been aggravated by a 32% increase in submissions over the past year. This strategic shift aims to address the backlog more effectively and allocate resources more efficiently, ensuring newer and more critical vulnerabilities receive the attention they require for maintaining robust cybersecurity measures.

Explore more

How Is Check Point Addressing New Zero-Day Attacks?

The Netherlands’ National Cyber Security Centre has recommended disabling implied VPN rules for gateways that cannot be immediately patched. This urgent advisory follows a series of sophisticated cyberattacks targeting critical infrastructure managed by Check Point security systems. On July 23, sophisticated threat actors successfully exploited a previously unknown zero-day vulnerability in the Check Point Security Management Server, designated as CVE-2026-93616.

How Is AI-Native Infrastructure Rebuilding the Enterprise?

The initial phase of AI adoption focused on individual productivity, but the current era emphasizes the unglamorous work of structural integration. Recent data reveals a stark contrast between the enthusiasm for artificial intelligence and the financial reality of its deployment. While 44 percent of organizations claim to be scaling these technologies, only a mere 20 percent have successfully integrated AI

How HR Supports Employees During Separation and Divorce

The silent struggle of a crumbling marriage often manifests in the subtle tremor of a hand reaching for a morning coffee or a sudden lapse in a once-impeccable professional focus. When a long-term partnership dissolves, the shockwaves rarely stop at the front door; they follow the employee directly into the office, affecting stamina and mental clarity. Productivity loss associated with

How Companies Can Prevent Middle Manager Burnout This Fall

The crisp arrival of September traditionally signals a season of renewal, yet for the middle managers holding corporate structures together, it often functions as a high-velocity collision between summer exhaustion and the unrelenting pressure of year-end targets. While the broader workforce often returns from vacation with a sense of restored energy, those tasked with operational oversight frequently find themselves depleted

How Can You Build a Strong AI Governance Framework for CX?

Introduction Establishing a rigorous oversight structure for automated customer service tools requires far more than merely selecting the most advanced software available on the current market today. In 2026, enterprise contact centers rely on artificial intelligence to handle an overwhelming majority of customer interactions, yet many organizations still lack a unified strategy for accountability. This article explores the essential steps