Illusion of Authenticity: Hong Kong’s Fight Against Crypto Firms Misrepresenting as Banks

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has recently issued a warning to cryptocurrency businesses that presenting themselves as banks and using banking terminology could potentially violate the region’s banking laws. The central bank highlighted that, under Hong Kong’s banking laws, only licensed institutions are allowed to carry out banking or deposit-taking businesses in the region.

Banking laws in Hong Kong

In Hong Kong, specific banking laws are in place to regulate the financial sector. These laws state that only licensed institutions are authorized to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities. This means that any company claiming to be a bank or offering banking services without the required license may be breaching the law. The objective of these regulations is to ensure proper oversight and protection of customers’ funds within the banking system.

Warning against misleading terminology

To prevent potential violations of banking laws, the HKMA has cautioned the public against crypto businesses using misleading terminology. Companies describing themselves as “crypto bank,” “digital asset bank,” or “crypto asset bank” may mislead customers into believing they are operating as licensed banks. Additionally, claiming to offer banking services or banking accounts without the necessary authorization may also be a breach of the law.

Prohibition of “Bank” Usage

The HKMA has clearly stated that, other than authorized institutions, it is unlawful for individuals or businesses to use the word “bank” in the name or descriptions of their companies. This measure aims to prevent entities from falsely representing themselves as banks and offering banking services without the appropriate licensing. The prohibition of misleading terminology helps protect consumers from potential fraudulent activities in the financial sector.

Violation of deposit facilitation

In addition to misleading terminology, facilitating the taking of deposits without the proper license is also considered a violation of the law. The HKMA emphasizes that any entity engaged in deposit-taking activities must possess the necessary authorization to ensure the safety and security of depositors’ funds. Unauthorized crypto firms that accept deposits without the required license put customers’ funds at risk and may face legal consequences.

Lack of central bank oversight

It is important to note that crypto firms, which are not banks, are not directly supervised by the central bank, the HKMA. This means that customers who place their funds within so-called “crypto banks” are not protected by the region’s deposit protection scheme. Unlike licensed banks, these crypto businesses may not adhere to stringent regulatory requirements and may lack the necessary safeguards for customers’ funds.

Hong Kong’s crackdown on licensing violations

Hong Kong has been increasingly cracking down on violations of licensing laws within the cryptocurrency sector. A recent case involved the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) issuing a warning to crypto exchange JPEX for allegedly promoting its products and services in Hong Kong without securing a license. The exchange’s staff disappeared from its Token 2049 booth in Singapore, raising concerns about its operations. Furthermore, JPEX implemented higher withdrawal fees to discourage users from retrieving their funds.

The HKMA’s warning serves as a reminder to cryptocurrency businesses operating in Hong Kong to comply with the region’s banking laws. The use of misleading terminology and offering banking services without the necessary authorization can lead to severe legal consequences. Customers should exercise caution when dealing with entities that portray themselves as banks but lack proper licensing. Protecting customers’ funds and maintaining the integrity of the financial system are key priorities for the HKMA, and they will continue to enforce regulations to ensure a safe and transparent financial environment in Hong Kong.

Explore more

TamperedChef Malware Steals Data via Fake PDF Editors

I’m thrilled to sit down with Dominic Jainy, an IT professional whose deep expertise in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and blockchain extends into the critical realm of cybersecurity. Today, we’re diving into a chilling cybercrime campaign involving the TamperedChef malware, a sophisticated threat that disguises itself as a harmless PDF editor to steal sensitive data. In our conversation, Dominic will

How Are Attackers Using LOTL Tactics to Evade Detection?

Imagine a cyberattack so subtle that it slips through the cracks of even the most robust security systems, using tools already present on a victim’s device to wreak havoc without raising alarms. This is the reality of living-off-the-land (LOTL) tactics, a growing menace in the cybersecurity landscape. As threat actors increasingly leverage legitimate processes and native tools to mask their

UpCrypter Phishing Campaign Deploys Dangerous RATs Globally

Introduction Imagine opening an email that appears to be a routine voicemail notification, only to find that clicking on the attached file unleashes a devastating cyberattack on your organization, putting sensitive data and operations at risk. This scenario is becoming alarmingly common with the rise of a sophisticated phishing campaign utilizing a custom loader known as UpCrypter to deploy remote

How Are Iran-Nexus Hackers Targeting Global Governments?

In an era where digital warfare is as critical as physical conflict, a sophisticated spear-phishing campaign linked to Iranian-aligned hackers has emerged as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities facing global diplomatic networks. Recently uncovered, this operation, attributed to the Homeland Justice group and Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS), has targeted embassies, consulates, and international organizations with alarming

Fintech Cybersecurity Threats – Review

Imagine a financial system so seamless that transactions happen in mere seconds, connecting millions of users to a digital economy with just a tap. Yet, beneath this convenience lies a looming danger: a single compromised credential can unleash chaos, draining millions from accounts before anyone notices. This scenario isn’t hypothetical—it played out in Brazil’s Pix instant payment system, a cornerstone