The Importance of Reviewing and Updating Agreements with Employees—A Lesson from a Recent SEC Settlement

In the fast-paced business world, it is crucial for companies to regularly review and update their agreements with employees. Failure to do so can result in these agreements being challenged or invalidated, leaving companies exposed to potential legal repercussions. A recent settlement announced by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) serves as a stark reminder to employers of the need to stay up-to-date on their agreements with employees.

Fines and Penalties: Risks of Non-Compliance

Companies sometimes find themselves under investigation and are forced to pay fines or penalties due to provisions in their agreements with employees. These provisions may run afoul of regulations and need to be revised to ensure compliance. By routinely reviewing and updating agreements, companies can mitigate the risk of being penalised and enhance their legal standing.

SEC Settlement: An Important Wake-Up Call

The SEC settlement mentioned above draws attention to the importance of regularly reviewing and updating agreements used with employees. In this particular case, the agreements contained a common provision requiring employees to affirm that they had not filed a complaint about the company. The SEC concluded that such provisions discouraged employees from filing complaints with federal agencies, including the SEC. This demonstrates the need for employers to reconsider clauses that may deter their employees from exercising their rights.

Cracking down on interfering agreements

Federal agencies are cracking down on agreements that may interfere with their jurisdiction or stifle employee rights. The SEC’s action highlights a broader trend where other agencies are also taking measures to prevent agreements from compromising their authority. Additionally, state legislatures are increasingly imposing limitations on confidentiality provisions in agreements with employees, seeking to safeguard employee rights and create a fair and transparent working environment.

Voiding limitations on employee rights

Courts and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) have consistently held that any attempt to limit an employee’s ability to file a charge or participate in an investigation with the EEOC is void. This underscores the obligation employers have to respect and protect employee rights. By staying vigilant and updating agreements, companies can avoid legal complications and ensure compliance with employment laws.

Settlement actions: proactive measures

As part of the SEC settlement, the company involved took proactive measures to rectify the situation. It hired an external Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) consultant to thoroughly review its agreements. Additionally, it agreed to revise past agreements that contained discouraging provisions and, importantly, notify employees about their rights. These actions not only rectify past mistakes but also serve as an example to other companies on the proactive steps they can take to ensure compliance with employment regulations.

NLRA Violations: A Further Manifestation

Beyond SEC scrutiny, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has taken a stance on agreements that violate employees’ rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Notably, certain confidentiality and nondisparagement provisions in employee severance agreements have been deemed in violation of the NLRA by the NLRB. This serves as another reminder of the importance for companies to continuously review, update, and align their agreements with applicable labor laws.

State Restrictions: Protecting Employee Rights

Recognizing the need to protect employee rights, several states have enacted laws to restrict the use of nondisclosure and nondisparagement clauses in agreements with employees. By limiting the enforceability of such provisions, these states are taking proactive steps to ensure that employees have a voice and can exercise their rights without fear of retribution or silencing. Companies operating in multiple states must be cognizant of the evolving legal landscape and adjust their agreements accordingly.

In an ever-changing legal and regulatory environment, it is crucial for companies to prioritize the regular review and update of their agreements with employees. The recent SEC settlement serves as a powerful reminder of the potential risks and consequences of outdated and non-compliant agreements. Failing to review and update these agreements can result in fines, penalties, and potential legal challenges. By staying abreast of regulatory changes, adhering to court decisions, and keeping employee rights at the forefront, companies can maintain legal compliance, foster positive employer-employee relationships, and create an environment where all parties can thrive.

Explore more

How Is AI Closing the Gap in Customer Conversations?

The digital footprints of modern commerce often leave behind a trail of binary data, but the most profound truths about a brand’s health remain locked within the messy, emotional, and often unpredictable nuance of human speech. While organizations have spent decades perfecting the art of the post-transactional survey, they have largely ignored the goldmine of information vibrating through the phone

How Does CRM Fragmentation Drain Your Sales Productivity?

High-performing sales representatives often spend more time acting as digital detectives than closing deals because their customer data lives in ten different places at once. This digital fragmentation forces teams into a perpetual juggling act where navigating a labyrinth of browser tabs becomes the primary mode of operation. When information about a single lead is scattered across disparate platforms, preparing

How to Transform Real Estate CRMs Into High-Yield Assets

The relentless hum of a high-performance computer often masks the silent financial drain of a real estate professional’s most expensive and underutilized digital tool. Most real estate practitioners pay significant monthly fees for advanced Customer Relationship Management platforms, yet many treat these sophisticated engines like digital filing cabinets. While the technology promises to streamline operations and maximize revenue, the reality

AI Reshapes Technical Hiring and Entry-Level Pipelines

The once-reliable path of starting as a junior analyst and slowly climbing the corporate ladder has been fundamentally disrupted by the rapid integration of sophisticated autonomous systems that now manage routine tasks with superhuman speed. Hiring managers are no longer looking for people to organize spreadsheets; they are seeking architects of the future. This shift marks the definitive transition toward

AI Recruitment Tools Invent and Reinforce Their Own Biases

When a recruiting algorithm selects a candidate not because of their skills but because it hallucinated a success pattern out of thin air, the fundamental promise of meritocratic automation begins to crumble. This shift marks a departure from the era when developers merely feared that machines would inherit human prejudices; today, the concern is that they are actively manufacturing their