The Importance of Reviewing and Updating Agreements with Employees—A Lesson from a Recent SEC Settlement

In the fast-paced business world, it is crucial for companies to regularly review and update their agreements with employees. Failure to do so can result in these agreements being challenged or invalidated, leaving companies exposed to potential legal repercussions. A recent settlement announced by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) serves as a stark reminder to employers of the need to stay up-to-date on their agreements with employees.

Fines and Penalties: Risks of Non-Compliance

Companies sometimes find themselves under investigation and are forced to pay fines or penalties due to provisions in their agreements with employees. These provisions may run afoul of regulations and need to be revised to ensure compliance. By routinely reviewing and updating agreements, companies can mitigate the risk of being penalised and enhance their legal standing.

SEC Settlement: An Important Wake-Up Call

The SEC settlement mentioned above draws attention to the importance of regularly reviewing and updating agreements used with employees. In this particular case, the agreements contained a common provision requiring employees to affirm that they had not filed a complaint about the company. The SEC concluded that such provisions discouraged employees from filing complaints with federal agencies, including the SEC. This demonstrates the need for employers to reconsider clauses that may deter their employees from exercising their rights.

Cracking down on interfering agreements

Federal agencies are cracking down on agreements that may interfere with their jurisdiction or stifle employee rights. The SEC’s action highlights a broader trend where other agencies are also taking measures to prevent agreements from compromising their authority. Additionally, state legislatures are increasingly imposing limitations on confidentiality provisions in agreements with employees, seeking to safeguard employee rights and create a fair and transparent working environment.

Voiding limitations on employee rights

Courts and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) have consistently held that any attempt to limit an employee’s ability to file a charge or participate in an investigation with the EEOC is void. This underscores the obligation employers have to respect and protect employee rights. By staying vigilant and updating agreements, companies can avoid legal complications and ensure compliance with employment laws.

Settlement actions: proactive measures

As part of the SEC settlement, the company involved took proactive measures to rectify the situation. It hired an external Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) consultant to thoroughly review its agreements. Additionally, it agreed to revise past agreements that contained discouraging provisions and, importantly, notify employees about their rights. These actions not only rectify past mistakes but also serve as an example to other companies on the proactive steps they can take to ensure compliance with employment regulations.

NLRA Violations: A Further Manifestation

Beyond SEC scrutiny, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has taken a stance on agreements that violate employees’ rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Notably, certain confidentiality and nondisparagement provisions in employee severance agreements have been deemed in violation of the NLRA by the NLRB. This serves as another reminder of the importance for companies to continuously review, update, and align their agreements with applicable labor laws.

State Restrictions: Protecting Employee Rights

Recognizing the need to protect employee rights, several states have enacted laws to restrict the use of nondisclosure and nondisparagement clauses in agreements with employees. By limiting the enforceability of such provisions, these states are taking proactive steps to ensure that employees have a voice and can exercise their rights without fear of retribution or silencing. Companies operating in multiple states must be cognizant of the evolving legal landscape and adjust their agreements accordingly.

In an ever-changing legal and regulatory environment, it is crucial for companies to prioritize the regular review and update of their agreements with employees. The recent SEC settlement serves as a powerful reminder of the potential risks and consequences of outdated and non-compliant agreements. Failing to review and update these agreements can result in fines, penalties, and potential legal challenges. By staying abreast of regulatory changes, adhering to court decisions, and keeping employee rights at the forefront, companies can maintain legal compliance, foster positive employer-employee relationships, and create an environment where all parties can thrive.

Explore more

Six Micro-Responses to Boost Professional Visibility and Impact

Achieving excellence in silence often feels like a noble pursuit, yet many dedicated professionals discover that their quiet diligence acts as a cloak rather than a ladder in today’s hyper-connected, digital-first corporate ecosystem. There is a persistent belief that the quality of one’s output will inevitably draw the necessary attention for career advancement. However, as the boundaries between physical offices

How Do You Lead an Untethered and Fluid Workforce?

High-performing professionals are no longer choosing between a corner office and a home study; they are instead selecting their next zip code based on the projects they lead and the lifestyles they desire. This kinetic energy defines the current labor market, where the era of the office versus remote debate is officially over, replaced by a reality that is far

Why Does High Performance No Longer Guarantee Job Security?

The unsettling silence that follows a mass layoff notification often leaves the most productive workers staring at their screens in disbelief, wondering how their record-breaking metrics failed to shield them from the corporate scythe. This scenario, once considered a rare anomaly reserved for the underperformers, has transformed into a standard feature of a global labor market where technical excellence is

How Do You Navigate the Shifting Realities of Work?

The traditional guarantee that a prestigious university degree would eventually lead to a corner office has evaporated into a landscape defined by algorithmic gatekeepers and decentralized career paths. This breakdown of the “degree-to-desk” pipeline marks a significant turning point where the old rules of professional advancement no longer seem to apply to the current reality. Modern professionals frequently encounter the

Hire for Character and Skill Instead of Elite Degrees

The persistent belief that a prestigious university emblem on a resume guarantees professional excellence is a myth that continues to stifle corporate innovation and equity. While a diploma from an elite institution certainly signals academic endurance and access to a specific social network, it fails to measure the grit required to thrive in a volatile market. As organizations face increasingly