The Importance of Reviewing and Updating Agreements with Employees—A Lesson from a Recent SEC Settlement

In the fast-paced business world, it is crucial for companies to regularly review and update their agreements with employees. Failure to do so can result in these agreements being challenged or invalidated, leaving companies exposed to potential legal repercussions. A recent settlement announced by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) serves as a stark reminder to employers of the need to stay up-to-date on their agreements with employees.

Fines and Penalties: Risks of Non-Compliance

Companies sometimes find themselves under investigation and are forced to pay fines or penalties due to provisions in their agreements with employees. These provisions may run afoul of regulations and need to be revised to ensure compliance. By routinely reviewing and updating agreements, companies can mitigate the risk of being penalised and enhance their legal standing.

SEC Settlement: An Important Wake-Up Call

The SEC settlement mentioned above draws attention to the importance of regularly reviewing and updating agreements used with employees. In this particular case, the agreements contained a common provision requiring employees to affirm that they had not filed a complaint about the company. The SEC concluded that such provisions discouraged employees from filing complaints with federal agencies, including the SEC. This demonstrates the need for employers to reconsider clauses that may deter their employees from exercising their rights.

Cracking down on interfering agreements

Federal agencies are cracking down on agreements that may interfere with their jurisdiction or stifle employee rights. The SEC’s action highlights a broader trend where other agencies are also taking measures to prevent agreements from compromising their authority. Additionally, state legislatures are increasingly imposing limitations on confidentiality provisions in agreements with employees, seeking to safeguard employee rights and create a fair and transparent working environment.

Voiding limitations on employee rights

Courts and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) have consistently held that any attempt to limit an employee’s ability to file a charge or participate in an investigation with the EEOC is void. This underscores the obligation employers have to respect and protect employee rights. By staying vigilant and updating agreements, companies can avoid legal complications and ensure compliance with employment laws.

Settlement actions: proactive measures

As part of the SEC settlement, the company involved took proactive measures to rectify the situation. It hired an external Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) consultant to thoroughly review its agreements. Additionally, it agreed to revise past agreements that contained discouraging provisions and, importantly, notify employees about their rights. These actions not only rectify past mistakes but also serve as an example to other companies on the proactive steps they can take to ensure compliance with employment regulations.

NLRA Violations: A Further Manifestation

Beyond SEC scrutiny, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has taken a stance on agreements that violate employees’ rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Notably, certain confidentiality and nondisparagement provisions in employee severance agreements have been deemed in violation of the NLRA by the NLRB. This serves as another reminder of the importance for companies to continuously review, update, and align their agreements with applicable labor laws.

State Restrictions: Protecting Employee Rights

Recognizing the need to protect employee rights, several states have enacted laws to restrict the use of nondisclosure and nondisparagement clauses in agreements with employees. By limiting the enforceability of such provisions, these states are taking proactive steps to ensure that employees have a voice and can exercise their rights without fear of retribution or silencing. Companies operating in multiple states must be cognizant of the evolving legal landscape and adjust their agreements accordingly.

In an ever-changing legal and regulatory environment, it is crucial for companies to prioritize the regular review and update of their agreements with employees. The recent SEC settlement serves as a powerful reminder of the potential risks and consequences of outdated and non-compliant agreements. Failing to review and update these agreements can result in fines, penalties, and potential legal challenges. By staying abreast of regulatory changes, adhering to court decisions, and keeping employee rights at the forefront, companies can maintain legal compliance, foster positive employer-employee relationships, and create an environment where all parties can thrive.

Explore more

Why Corporate Wellness Programs Fail to Fix Workplace Stress

The modern professional often finds that for every dollar spent on a meditation app by their employer, nearly one hundred and fifty dollars are drained from the global economy due to systemic burnout and disengagement. This economic disparity highlights a growing tension between the wellness industry, which has grown into a juggernaut worth sixty billion dollars, and the eight point

How to Fix the Workplace Communication and Feedback Crisis

The silent erosion of professional morale often begins not with a grand failure of strategy but with the subtle, persistent friction caused by poorly articulated managerial guidance. This disconnect between managerial intent and employee performance represents a significant hurdle for modern organizations, as traditional critique methods frequently lead to burnout rather than improvement. Addressing the central challenge of workplace communication

How Can You Close the Feedback Gap to Retain Top Talent?

When elite professionals choose to resign, the departure frequently stems from a prolonged absence of meaningful dialogue regarding their trajectory within the organization and the specific expectations surrounding their professional contributions. This silence creates a vacuum where uncertainty flourishes, eventually pushing high achievers toward the exit. Research indicates that nearly half of all employees who voluntarily leave their roles cite

Can AI Infrastructure Redefine Wealth Management?

The once-revolutionary promise of digital wealth management has hit a ceiling where simply layering more software atop crumbling legacy systems no longer yields a competitive edge for modern firms. This realization has sparked a fundamental shift in how the industry approaches technology. Instead of pursuing cosmetic updates, firms are now looking at the very bones of their operations to find

Family Office Models Reshape Korean Wealth Management

The skyline of Seoul no longer just represents industrial might but also signals a historic accumulation of private capital that is forcing the nation’s most prestigious financial institutions to rewrite their playbooks entirely. The traditional private banking model, once centered on the 1-billion-won investor, is undergoing a radical metamorphosis. As of 2026, a burgeoning class of ultra-wealthy households has redefined