The Importance of Reviewing and Updating Agreements with Employees—A Lesson from a Recent SEC Settlement

In the fast-paced business world, it is crucial for companies to regularly review and update their agreements with employees. Failure to do so can result in these agreements being challenged or invalidated, leaving companies exposed to potential legal repercussions. A recent settlement announced by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) serves as a stark reminder to employers of the need to stay up-to-date on their agreements with employees.

Fines and Penalties: Risks of Non-Compliance

Companies sometimes find themselves under investigation and are forced to pay fines or penalties due to provisions in their agreements with employees. These provisions may run afoul of regulations and need to be revised to ensure compliance. By routinely reviewing and updating agreements, companies can mitigate the risk of being penalised and enhance their legal standing.

SEC Settlement: An Important Wake-Up Call

The SEC settlement mentioned above draws attention to the importance of regularly reviewing and updating agreements used with employees. In this particular case, the agreements contained a common provision requiring employees to affirm that they had not filed a complaint about the company. The SEC concluded that such provisions discouraged employees from filing complaints with federal agencies, including the SEC. This demonstrates the need for employers to reconsider clauses that may deter their employees from exercising their rights.

Cracking down on interfering agreements

Federal agencies are cracking down on agreements that may interfere with their jurisdiction or stifle employee rights. The SEC’s action highlights a broader trend where other agencies are also taking measures to prevent agreements from compromising their authority. Additionally, state legislatures are increasingly imposing limitations on confidentiality provisions in agreements with employees, seeking to safeguard employee rights and create a fair and transparent working environment.

Voiding limitations on employee rights

Courts and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) have consistently held that any attempt to limit an employee’s ability to file a charge or participate in an investigation with the EEOC is void. This underscores the obligation employers have to respect and protect employee rights. By staying vigilant and updating agreements, companies can avoid legal complications and ensure compliance with employment laws.

Settlement actions: proactive measures

As part of the SEC settlement, the company involved took proactive measures to rectify the situation. It hired an external Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) consultant to thoroughly review its agreements. Additionally, it agreed to revise past agreements that contained discouraging provisions and, importantly, notify employees about their rights. These actions not only rectify past mistakes but also serve as an example to other companies on the proactive steps they can take to ensure compliance with employment regulations.

NLRA Violations: A Further Manifestation

Beyond SEC scrutiny, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has taken a stance on agreements that violate employees’ rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Notably, certain confidentiality and nondisparagement provisions in employee severance agreements have been deemed in violation of the NLRA by the NLRB. This serves as another reminder of the importance for companies to continuously review, update, and align their agreements with applicable labor laws.

State Restrictions: Protecting Employee Rights

Recognizing the need to protect employee rights, several states have enacted laws to restrict the use of nondisclosure and nondisparagement clauses in agreements with employees. By limiting the enforceability of such provisions, these states are taking proactive steps to ensure that employees have a voice and can exercise their rights without fear of retribution or silencing. Companies operating in multiple states must be cognizant of the evolving legal landscape and adjust their agreements accordingly.

In an ever-changing legal and regulatory environment, it is crucial for companies to prioritize the regular review and update of their agreements with employees. The recent SEC settlement serves as a powerful reminder of the potential risks and consequences of outdated and non-compliant agreements. Failing to review and update these agreements can result in fines, penalties, and potential legal challenges. By staying abreast of regulatory changes, adhering to court decisions, and keeping employee rights at the forefront, companies can maintain legal compliance, foster positive employer-employee relationships, and create an environment where all parties can thrive.

Explore more

Fox Agency Tops UK 2026 B2B Content Marketing Rankings

Modern corporate communication has moved far beyond simple press releases and brochures to become the very heartbeat of enterprise growth and strategic brand positioning. The latest Benchmarking Report reveals a significant shift in the UK agency landscape, where content marketing has officially claimed its spot as the second most dominant specialism. This evolution reflects a market that increasingly values the

How Can You Win B2B Buyers Before the First Sales Call?

The traditional B2B sales cycle has transformed into a ghost hunt where marketers spend millions chasing digital footprints that lead to doors that have already been locked from the inside by better-prepared competitors. This systemic failure stems from a reliance on reactive intent signals. When a prospect finally downloads a whitepaper or registers for a webinar, most organizations celebrate a

How Do Your Leadership Signals Shape Workplace Culture?

The silent vibration of a smartphone notifying a leader of a market shift can trigger a physiological chain reaction that alters the psychological safety of an entire department before a single word is ever spoken. In high-pressure environments, the executive presence serves as a primary broadcast tower, emitting signals that either stabilize the collective or broadcast a frequency of frantic

Why Is Your Workplace Choosing Decisions Over Agency?

Modern professionals find themselves trapped in an endless cycle of digital noise where the simple act of clearing an inbox feels like a monumental achievement despite contributing nothing to the long-term strategic health of their organization. This persistent state of digital triage defines the current era of labor, where the average worker navigates an unrelenting stream of 153 instant messages

Is Adaptability More Important Than Experience for Leaders?

The traditional resume, once a gold-standard map of professional competence, is rapidly transforming into a historical artifact that fails to predict how a leader will perform in a world of constant disruption. This document, thick with prestigious titles and decades of industry tenure, used to offer a sense of security to hiring committees. However, the modern corporate landscape has proven