NLRB Expands Joint Employer Criteria: Understanding the New Control Standard

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has introduced a significant shift in the standards for joint employer status. This new rule alters how businesses may be jointly responsible for the same group of workers. Previously, the standard was based on the actual exercise of control over employees’ work conditions. However, the updated criteria expand this definition to include the reserved right to control, whether or not that right is actively exercised. This change aims to reflect the complexities of modern workplace relationships where indirect influences can inform employee working conditions. Companies in various sectors may find themselves needing to reassess their business practices and relationships with partnering firms or contractors in light of this broader joint employer definition. This influential update has the potential to reshape business liabilities and worker rights across a multitude of industries, prompting careful review and adaptation from employers to ensure compliance.

The Shift Away from Direct Control

Historically, the NLRB required proof of “substantial direct and immediate control” over workers’ essential job conditions for two companies to be considered joint employers. The 2020 standard took a narrow approach, concentrating on direct and significant contextual actions. Contrastingly, the new rule, effective from February 26, 2024, moves away from this. Now, reserved authority or even indirect control over critical aspects of employment—which includes wages, work hours, assignments, supervision, and other core factors—can trigger joint employer status. This evolution signals a notable change in stance from the NLRB and broadens the potential for union bargaining and liability for labor practices.

The change means that entities such as franchisors or clients of staffing agencies, who may not be directly managing workers, could find themselves with the responsibility to negotiate labor terms. The ruling indicates that the mere reservation of authority over employment conditions, whether used or not, suffices to warrant joint employer designation. Underlying this shift is the NLRB’s aim to ensure workers’ rights to collective bargaining are preserved, even in complex employment arrangements. Thus, a company could be deemed a joint employer and held accountable for labor law violations based on its reserved right to control job conditions, even when there is no exercised control.

Exploring the Implications of Indirect Control

The recent ruling affecting franchising businesses and others using subcontractors or staffing agencies has significant implications. It implies that companies must closely examine their contractual relationships to avoid being classified as ‘joint employers’ due to indirect control over employment conditions. This necessitates careful monitoring of any influence they may exert, even if not direct, to prevent becoming liable for additional responsibilities associated with staff.

Firms are encouraged to review their contracts and operational practices to identify where they might seem to have influence over worker-related aspects. The NLRB’s rule, despite asserting a uniform approach, requires intricate case-by-case analyses, complicating compliance. Thus, organizations need to proactively revise their practices in relation to this broadened rule to sidestep unforeseen legal pitfalls, especially given the changing dynamics of the workplace and the increasingly ambiguous lines of workforce accountability.

Explore more

Can Federal Lands Power the Future of AI Infrastructure?

I’m thrilled to sit down with Dominic Jainy, an esteemed IT professional whose deep knowledge of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and blockchain offers a unique perspective on the intersection of technology and federal policy. Today, we’re diving into the US Department of Energy’s ambitious plan to develop a data center at the Savannah River Site in South Carolina. Our conversation

Can Your Mouse Secretly Eavesdrop on Conversations?

In an age where technology permeates every aspect of daily life, the notion that a seemingly harmless device like a computer mouse could pose a privacy threat is startling, raising urgent questions about the security of modern hardware. Picture a high-end optical mouse, designed for precision in gaming or design work, sitting quietly on a desk. What if this device,

Building the Case for EDI in Dynamics 365 Efficiency

In today’s fast-paced business environment, organizations leveraging Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Supply Chain Management (F&SCM) are increasingly faced with the challenge of optimizing their operations to stay competitive, especially when manual processes slow down critical workflows like order processing and invoicing, which can severely impact efficiency. The inefficiencies stemming from outdated methods not only drain resources but also risk

Structured Data Boosts AI Snippets and Search Visibility

In the fast-paced digital arena where search engines are increasingly powered by artificial intelligence, standing out amidst the vast online content is a formidable challenge for any website. AI-driven systems like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode are redefining how information is retrieved and presented to users, moving beyond traditional keyword searches to dynamic, conversational summaries. At the heart of

How Is Oracle Boosting Cloud Power with AMD and Nvidia?

In an era where artificial intelligence is reshaping industries at an unprecedented pace, the demand for robust cloud infrastructure has never been more critical, and Oracle is stepping up to meet this challenge head-on with strategic alliances that promise to redefine its position in the market. As enterprises increasingly rely on AI-driven solutions for everything from data analytics to generative