National Labor Relations Board Sets Limits on Severance Agreement Provisions

Last month, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) made a decision that changed the game regarding severance agreements. The ruling confirmed that overly broad confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses have a “clear chilling tendency” and that offering agreements with such provisions violates the law. However, the NLRB did not ban severance agreements outright, as long as they are narrowly tailored.

Severance agreements are still allowed, but with certain limitations as confirmed by the NLRB decision. Employers must take care to draft severance agreements that do not include overly broad confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions. These types of clauses create an environment in which employees may feel that they cannot speak out against their employer, even if they have legitimate concerns about the conditions of their employment or the workplace culture.

Overly broad confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions have a “clear chilling tendency.” The NLRB has found that confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions in severance agreements are unlawful when they prevent employees from exercising their rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). These provisions are overly restrictive and prevent employees from speaking out about legitimate concerns, which can be protected under the NLRA.

Employers should take caution when drafting severance agreements. According to the NLRB decision, offering agreements with overly broad confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions violates the law. This is because such provisions create a legally binding agreement that reinforces the employer’s efforts to restrict an employee’s protected rights.

The good news is that confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions in severance agreements are still permitted – as long as they are narrowly tailored. The NLRB decision reiterated the importance of narrowly tailoring such provisions, which should include a temporal limitation and should be conveyed as clearly as possible to avoid confusion.

According to the NLRB’s latest memo, employers should avoid using language that may interfere with their employees’ exercise of NLRA rights in any form of communication. This includes handbooks, policies, forms, and other less formal agreements such as severance agreements. It is suggested that supervisors should not discourage employees from discussing the terms of their severance agreements, nor should they retaliate against those who attempt to do so.

Employers need to be aware that the NLRB’s decision has a retroactive effect, i.e., it applies to both existing and new severance agreements. If they are found to have violated these provisions, employers may be subject to legal penalties or may be required to rewrite the provisions in question. Therefore, it is advisable for companies to review their existing severance agreements to ensure compliance with the new guidelines.

The importance of tailoring agreement language cannot be overstated. It is crucial for employers to carefully draft and tailor the language used in severance agreements. The NLRB decision serves as a reminder that boilerplate savings clauses or disclaimers will not necessarily cure overly broad provisions. Employers must reassure employees that they still have the ability to exercise their NLRA rights without fear of retaliation, censorship, or any other undue limitation.

The recent decision of the NLRB on severance agreements has established clear limits on confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions that are too broad. To avoid legal repercussions and difficulties, employers should meticulously draft the language used in severance agreements to restrict their employees’ NLRA rights as narrowly as possible. Employers should also avoid using language that could interfere with the exercise of NLRA rights in any other communications with their employees.

Explore more

Why Should Leaders Invest in Employee Career Growth?

In today’s fast-paced business landscape, a staggering statistic reveals the stakes of neglecting employee development: turnover costs the median S&P 500 company $480 million annually due to talent loss, underscoring a critical challenge for leaders. This immense financial burden highlights the urgent need to retain skilled individuals and maintain a competitive edge through strategic initiatives. Employee career growth, often overlooked

Making Time for Questions to Boost Workplace Curiosity

Introduction to Fostering Inquiry at Work Imagine a bustling office where deadlines loom large, meetings are packed with agendas, and every minute counts—yet no one dares to ask a clarifying question for fear of derailing the schedule. This scenario is all too common in modern workplaces, where the pressure to perform often overshadows the need for curiosity. Fostering an environment

Embedded Finance: From SaaS Promise to SME Practice

Imagine a small business owner managing daily operations through a single software platform, seamlessly handling not just inventory or customer relations but also payments, loans, and business accounts without ever stepping into a bank. This is the transformative vision of embedded finance, a trend that integrates financial services directly into vertical Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) platforms, turning them into indispensable tools for

DevOps Tools: Gateways to Major Cyberattacks Exposed

In the rapidly evolving digital ecosystem, DevOps tools have emerged as indispensable assets for organizations aiming to streamline software development and IT operations with unmatched efficiency, making them critical to modern business success. Platforms like GitHub, Jira, and Confluence enable seamless collaboration, allowing teams to manage code, track projects, and document workflows at an accelerated pace. However, this very integration

Trend Analysis: Agentic DevOps in Digital Transformation

In an era where digital transformation remains a critical yet elusive goal for countless enterprises, the frustration of stalled progress is palpable— over 70% of initiatives fail to meet expectations, costing billions annually in wasted resources and missed opportunities. This staggering reality underscores a persistent struggle to modernize IT infrastructure amid soaring costs and sluggish timelines. As companies grapple with