National Labor Relations Board Rules That Certain Severance Agreement Provisions Violate NLRA

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) recently ruled that certain non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions in severance agreements violate the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The Board found that these provisions unlawfully restrain employees from exercising their rights to engage in protected activity. This ruling has significant implications for employers who use severance agreements and has prompted the need to revisit and tailor these agreements to avoid legal consequences.

The NLRB ruled that non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions in severance agreements violate the NLRA by restricting employees from engaging in protected activity. Specifically, the Board stated that such provisions restrain protected activity by limiting an employee’s ability to make public and private statements about their terms and conditions of employment, assist coworkers with workplace issues, and engage with the NLRB to bring an unfair labor practice (ULP) charge or assist in an investigation.

The NLRB’s ruling highlights several protected activities that are restrained by nondisparagement and confidentiality provisions. These activities include an employee’s ability to speak out publicly or privately about their employment conditions, as well as their capacity to assist coworkers facing workplace concerns or violations. These provisions also limit an individual’s ability to work with the NLRB to bring charges against the employer or assist with ongoing investigations.

The NLRA protects former employees. The Board’s ruling also emphasizes that the NLRA’s protections extend to former employees. This means that severance agreements must not infringe upon these protected rights, even after an employee’s employment has ended. As a result, employers must be aware of the legal implications of including non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions in agreements to avoid legal repercussions.

In light of the NLRB ruling, employers must revisit their form separation agreements and tailor them to address specific concerns. This may include adding language that excepts NLRA-protected activity from confidentiality provisions. Additionally, severance agreements should be framed using terms that are excluded from NLRA protection rather than using the term “disparagement.”

Enforcing preexisting confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses that the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) considers overbroad may pose a risk of Unfair Labor Practice (ULP) charges and may result in the award of monetary damages. While the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) does not specifically allow for monetary penalties, the general counsel of the NLRB currently has a policy of seeking monetary relief directly related to a ULP, which includes attorney’s fees and costs. It is crucial for employers to consider these risks before enforcing such provisions.

In conclusion, the recent NLRB ruling on nondisparagement and confidentiality provisions in severance agreements has brought about significant changes for employers. The ruling emphasizes the importance of not including provisions that restrict employees from engaging in protected activity under the NLRA. Employers must customize their severance agreements to address specific concerns and avoid legal repercussions. While generic language may not be adequate, provisions can still be modified to address concerns and prevent harm. Employers who do not comply with the NLRB’s ruling run the risk of facing legal and financial repercussions.

Explore more

Robotic Process Automation Software – Review

In an era of digital transformation, businesses are constantly striving to enhance operational efficiency. A staggering amount of time is spent on repetitive tasks that can often distract employees from more strategic work. Enter Robotic Process Automation (RPA), a technology that has revolutionized the way companies handle mundane activities. RPA software automates routine processes, freeing human workers to focus on

RPA Revolutionizes Banking With Efficiency and Cost Reductions

In today’s fast-paced financial world, how can banks maintain both precision and velocity without succumbing to human error? A striking statistic reveals manual errors cost the financial sector billions each year. Daily banking operations—from processing transactions to compliance checks—are riddled with risks of inaccuracies. It is within this context that banks are looking toward a solution that promises not just

Europe’s 5G Deployment: Regional Disparities and Policy Impacts

The landscape of 5G deployment in Europe is marked by notable regional disparities, with Northern and Southern parts of the continent surging ahead while Western and Eastern regions struggle to keep pace. Northern countries like Denmark and Sweden, along with Southern nations such as Greece, are at the forefront, boasting some of the highest 5G coverage percentages. In contrast, Western

Leadership Mindset for Sustainable DevOps Cost Optimization

Introducing Dominic Jainy, a notable expert in IT with a comprehensive background in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and blockchain technologies. Jainy is dedicated to optimizing the utilization of these groundbreaking technologies across various industries, focusing particularly on sustainable DevOps cost optimization and leadership in technology management. In this insightful discussion, Jainy delves into the pivotal leadership strategies and mindset shifts

AI in DevOps – Review

In the fast-paced world of technology, the convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and DevOps marks a pivotal shift in how software development and IT operations are managed. As enterprises increasingly seek efficiency and agility, AI is emerging as a crucial component in DevOps practices, offering automation and predictive capabilities that drastically alter traditional workflows. This review delves into the transformative