National Labor Relations Board Rules That Certain Severance Agreement Provisions Violate NLRA

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) recently ruled that certain non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions in severance agreements violate the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The Board found that these provisions unlawfully restrain employees from exercising their rights to engage in protected activity. This ruling has significant implications for employers who use severance agreements and has prompted the need to revisit and tailor these agreements to avoid legal consequences.

The NLRB ruled that non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions in severance agreements violate the NLRA by restricting employees from engaging in protected activity. Specifically, the Board stated that such provisions restrain protected activity by limiting an employee’s ability to make public and private statements about their terms and conditions of employment, assist coworkers with workplace issues, and engage with the NLRB to bring an unfair labor practice (ULP) charge or assist in an investigation.

The NLRB’s ruling highlights several protected activities that are restrained by nondisparagement and confidentiality provisions. These activities include an employee’s ability to speak out publicly or privately about their employment conditions, as well as their capacity to assist coworkers facing workplace concerns or violations. These provisions also limit an individual’s ability to work with the NLRB to bring charges against the employer or assist with ongoing investigations.

The NLRA protects former employees. The Board’s ruling also emphasizes that the NLRA’s protections extend to former employees. This means that severance agreements must not infringe upon these protected rights, even after an employee’s employment has ended. As a result, employers must be aware of the legal implications of including non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions in agreements to avoid legal repercussions.

In light of the NLRB ruling, employers must revisit their form separation agreements and tailor them to address specific concerns. This may include adding language that excepts NLRA-protected activity from confidentiality provisions. Additionally, severance agreements should be framed using terms that are excluded from NLRA protection rather than using the term “disparagement.”

Enforcing preexisting confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses that the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) considers overbroad may pose a risk of Unfair Labor Practice (ULP) charges and may result in the award of monetary damages. While the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) does not specifically allow for monetary penalties, the general counsel of the NLRB currently has a policy of seeking monetary relief directly related to a ULP, which includes attorney’s fees and costs. It is crucial for employers to consider these risks before enforcing such provisions.

In conclusion, the recent NLRB ruling on nondisparagement and confidentiality provisions in severance agreements has brought about significant changes for employers. The ruling emphasizes the importance of not including provisions that restrict employees from engaging in protected activity under the NLRA. Employers must customize their severance agreements to address specific concerns and avoid legal repercussions. While generic language may not be adequate, provisions can still be modified to address concerns and prevent harm. Employers who do not comply with the NLRB’s ruling run the risk of facing legal and financial repercussions.

Explore more

AI Revolutionizes Corporate Finance: Enhancing CFO Strategies

Imagine a finance department where decisions are made with unprecedented speed and accuracy, and predictions of market trends are made almost effortlessly. In today’s rapidly changing business landscape, CFOs are facing immense pressure to keep up. These leaders wonder: Can Artificial Intelligence be the game-changer they’ve been waiting for in corporate finance? The unexpected truth is that AI integration is

AI Revolutionizes Risk Management in Financial Trading

In an era characterized by rapid change and volatility, artificial intelligence (AI) emerges as a pivotal tool for redefining risk management practices in financial markets. Financial institutions increasingly turn to AI for its advanced analytical capabilities, offering more precise and effective risk mitigation. This analysis delves into key trends, evaluates current market patterns, and projects the transformative journey AI is

Is AI Transforming or Enhancing Financial Sector Jobs?

Artificial intelligence stands at the forefront of technological innovation, shaping industries far and wide, and the financial sector is no exception to this transformative wave. As AI integrates into finance, it isn’t merely automating tasks or replacing jobs but is reshaping the very structure and nature of work. From asset allocation to compliance, AI’s influence stretches across the industry’s diverse

RPA’s Resilience: Evolving in Automation’s Complex Ecosystem

Ever heard the assertion that certain technologies are on the brink of extinction, only for them to persist against all odds? In the rapidly shifting tech landscape, Robotic Process Automation (RPA) has continually faced similar scrutiny, predicted to be overtaken by shinier, more advanced systems. Yet, here we are, with RPA not just surviving but thriving, cementing its role within

How Is RPA Transforming Business Automation?

In today’s fast-paced business environment, automation has become a pivotal strategy for companies striving for efficiency and innovation. Robotic Process Automation (RPA) has emerged as a key player in this automation revolution, transforming the way businesses operate. RPA’s capability to mimic human actions while interacting with digital systems has positioned it at the forefront of technological advancement. By enabling companies