National Labor Relations Board Rules That Certain Severance Agreement Provisions Violate NLRA

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) recently ruled that certain non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions in severance agreements violate the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The Board found that these provisions unlawfully restrain employees from exercising their rights to engage in protected activity. This ruling has significant implications for employers who use severance agreements and has prompted the need to revisit and tailor these agreements to avoid legal consequences.

The NLRB ruled that non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions in severance agreements violate the NLRA by restricting employees from engaging in protected activity. Specifically, the Board stated that such provisions restrain protected activity by limiting an employee’s ability to make public and private statements about their terms and conditions of employment, assist coworkers with workplace issues, and engage with the NLRB to bring an unfair labor practice (ULP) charge or assist in an investigation.

The NLRB’s ruling highlights several protected activities that are restrained by nondisparagement and confidentiality provisions. These activities include an employee’s ability to speak out publicly or privately about their employment conditions, as well as their capacity to assist coworkers facing workplace concerns or violations. These provisions also limit an individual’s ability to work with the NLRB to bring charges against the employer or assist with ongoing investigations.

The NLRA protects former employees. The Board’s ruling also emphasizes that the NLRA’s protections extend to former employees. This means that severance agreements must not infringe upon these protected rights, even after an employee’s employment has ended. As a result, employers must be aware of the legal implications of including non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions in agreements to avoid legal repercussions.

In light of the NLRB ruling, employers must revisit their form separation agreements and tailor them to address specific concerns. This may include adding language that excepts NLRA-protected activity from confidentiality provisions. Additionally, severance agreements should be framed using terms that are excluded from NLRA protection rather than using the term “disparagement.”

Enforcing preexisting confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses that the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) considers overbroad may pose a risk of Unfair Labor Practice (ULP) charges and may result in the award of monetary damages. While the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) does not specifically allow for monetary penalties, the general counsel of the NLRB currently has a policy of seeking monetary relief directly related to a ULP, which includes attorney’s fees and costs. It is crucial for employers to consider these risks before enforcing such provisions.

In conclusion, the recent NLRB ruling on nondisparagement and confidentiality provisions in severance agreements has brought about significant changes for employers. The ruling emphasizes the importance of not including provisions that restrict employees from engaging in protected activity under the NLRA. Employers must customize their severance agreements to address specific concerns and avoid legal repercussions. While generic language may not be adequate, provisions can still be modified to address concerns and prevent harm. Employers who do not comply with the NLRB’s ruling run the risk of facing legal and financial repercussions.

Explore more

Rakuten Eyes U.S. IPO for Expanding Credit Card Business

In a bold stride toward global financial dominance, a leading Japanese conglomerate, widely recognized for its expansive online shopping platform, is setting its sights on the American market with a potential initial public offering (IPO) for its burgeoning credit card division. This strategic move comes on the heels of the recent introduction of its first U.S.-based credit card, a product

Whispered Remark Fails to Prove Hostile Work Environment

This guide aims to help HR professionals, employers, and employees navigate the complex landscape of workplace harassment and retaliation claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. By breaking down a real-world federal court case involving a whispered remark, it provides actionable steps to understand legal thresholds, assess workplace incidents, and implement policies that foster inclusivity while

Why Is Asian WealthTech Funding Dropping in Q3 2025?

I’m thrilled to sit down with Nicholas Braiden, a trailblazer in the FinTech space and an early advocate for blockchain technology. With his deep expertise in financial innovation, Nicholas has guided numerous startups in harnessing tech to revolutionize digital payments and lending systems. Today, we’re diving into the latest trends in Asian WealthTech funding for Q3 2025, exploring the sharp

How Will AXA Partners and bolttech Transform EU Insurance?

In a rapidly evolving digital landscape, the insurance industry across the European Union, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland stands at a pivotal moment, with customer expectations shifting toward seamless, integrated solutions that fit effortlessly into everyday transactions. A groundbreaking partnership between AXA Partners, a leader in B2B2C insurance distribution, and bolttech, a global InsurTech innovator, promises to redefine how insurance

Contextual AI Drives Profitable Growth in Soft Insurance Market

The insurance industry finds itself at a pivotal moment, transitioning from a hard market environment—where high premiums and restricted capacity reigned supreme—to a softer market characterized by intense competition and shrinking premiums. This shift poses a significant challenge for insurers striving to sustain profitability while expanding their market presence. Amid declining rates and heightened rivalry, strategic innovation emerges as a