Expanding NLRA Protections: NLRB’s View on Workplace Racism Discussions and its Impact on Employers

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has confirmed that discussions about racism in the workplace are protected under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). This decision has significant implications for employers who may face legal risks if they retaliate against employees for engaging in such discussions.

Overview of the NLRB’s view on workplace discussions about racism

The NLRB has long recognized that employees have the right to engage in “concerted activities” for their mutual aid and protection. This includes discussions about workplace conditions, wages, and other terms and conditions of employment. Recently, the agency has expanded its view of what constitutes protected concerted activity to include discussions about societal issues, such as racism and discrimination.

Confirmation of protection for workplace discussions on racism under Section 7 of the NLRA

In a recent memo, the NLRB Office of the General Counsel confirmed that workplace discussions about racism fall under the umbrella of protected concerted activity under Section 7 of the NLRA. This means that employers cannot retaliate against employees for engaging in such discussions, even if those employees are not part of a union.

Retaliation against employees who engage in workplace discussions on racism

The NLRB’s memo makes it clear that employers who retaliate against employees for engaging in workplace discussions on racism risk facing legal action. This includes actions such as termination, demotion, or any other adverse employment action.

Violations of Section 8(a)(1) due to classroom discussions on racism

The memo also cites a recent case in which a medical school violated Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA by retaliating against a physician who led a classroom discussion on racism in medicine. The NLRB found that the discussion was inherently concerted and for mutual aid or protection; therefore, the retaliation constituted an unfair labor practice.

Extension of protection for workplace discussions on racism

The memo reinforces the NLRB’s view that discussions about racism in the workplace are a matter of vital importance to employees and, therefore, fall under the umbrella of protected concerted activity. This means that employers cannot take adverse employment actions against employees who engage in such discussions.

Joint initiative to raise awareness about worker retaliation issues

The memo is part of a joint initiative between the NLRB, the US Department of Labor, and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to raise awareness about retaliation issues when workers exercise their protected labor rights.

The NLRB’s Expansive View on Protected Concerted Activity Under the Biden Administration

The Biden administration has made it clear that they support workers’ rights to engage in protected concerted activity. The NLRB’s memo is in line with this policy, and employers should expect the agency to take an expansive view of what constitutes protected concerted activity.

Analyzing protected concerted activity in workplace discussions on racism

Employers who want to avoid enforcement action should analyze the circumstances of the situation at hand to determine if protected concerted activity is implicated under the NLRA. This may involve reviewing the employees’ speech, the context of the conversation, and the motives of the employer in taking any adverse action.

Steps for employers to avoid legal risks and handle workplace discussions on racism effectively

To avoid legal risks, employers should train their human resources personnel and supervisors to recognize protected concerted activity. They should also establish a non-retaliatory action plan to de-escalate and address underlying issues. Additionally, it is advisable to work closely with labor counsel when responding to workplace discussions involving racism and other societal issues.

The NLRB’s memo confirms that discussions about racism in the workplace are protected under Section 7 of the NLRA. Employers who retaliate against employees for engaging in such discussions risk facing legal action. To avoid these risks, employers should take proactive steps to recognize and address protected concerted activity in workplace discussions about racism.

Explore more

Is 2026 the Year of 5G for Latin America?

The Dawning of a New Connectivity Era The year 2026 is shaping up to be a watershed moment for fifth-generation mobile technology across Latin America. After years of planning, auctions, and initial trials, the region is on the cusp of a significant acceleration in 5G deployment, driven by a confluence of regulatory milestones, substantial investment commitments, and a strategic push

EU Set to Ban High-Risk Vendors From Critical Networks

The digital arteries that power European life, from instant mobile communications to the stability of the energy grid, are undergoing a security overhaul of unprecedented scale. After years of gentle persuasion and cautionary advice, the European Union is now poised to enact a sweeping mandate that will legally compel member states to remove high-risk technology suppliers from their most critical

AI Avatars Are Reshaping the Global Hiring Process

The initial handshake of a job interview is no longer a given; for a growing number of candidates, the first face they see is a digital one, carefully designed to ask questions, gauge responses, and represent a company on a global, 24/7 scale. This shift from human-to-human conversation to a human-to-AI interaction marks a pivotal moment in talent acquisition. For

Recruitment CRM vs. Applicant Tracking System: A Comparative Analysis

The frantic search for top talent has transformed recruitment from a simple act of posting jobs into a complex, strategic function demanding sophisticated tools. In this high-stakes environment, two categories of software have become indispensable: the Recruitment CRM and the Applicant Tracking System. Though often used interchangeably, these platforms serve fundamentally different purposes, and understanding their distinct roles is crucial

Could Your Star Recruit Lead to a Costly Lawsuit?

The relentless pursuit of top-tier talent often leads companies down a path of aggressive courtship, but a recent court ruling serves as a stark reminder that this path is fraught with hidden and expensive legal risks. In the high-stakes world of executive recruitment, the line between persuading a candidate and illegally inducing them is dangerously thin, and crossing it can