In today’s dynamic HR landscape, it’s vital to discern which technologies genuinely enhance our work and which are superfluous distractions. Ling-yi Tsai, an HRTech expert with vast experience in HR analytics and technology integration, helps organizations navigate this complexity and optimize their workforce management processes. Her insights reveal the nuanced decisions needed to successfully implement technology in HR.
Can you elaborate on your statement, “We are actually using technology for those problems that don’t exist”?
Technology should solve real, existing problems. However, many companies are adopting tech trends to stay “innovative” without clear benefits. For instance, implementing complex predictive models for minimal attrition rates or unnecessary gamification in tightly-knit teams. It’s essential to focus on genuine needs rather than theoretical issues.
How do you identify HR technologies that align with business requirements?
We start with a clear understanding of our business goals and challenges. Then, we evaluate new HR technologies based on their ability to address these specific needs rather than their popularity or novelty.
A rigorous process includes pilot testing, feedback collection, and assessing compatibility with existing systems. For example, once we identified a need for streamlined onboarding, we chose a platform that integrated seamlessly with our HRMS, reducing administrative work and enhancing the new hire experience.
Why do you believe certain HR technologies are not applicable to every organization?
Every organization has unique circumstances—size, culture, industry, and goals. A solution that works in one context may be irrelevant or inefficient in another. It’s vital to ensure that any technology adoption is contextually relevant and capable of addressing specific organizational needs.
What are the costs associated with tech implementation beyond monetary investments?
Beyond financial cost, implementing new tech involves significant time and energy. It requires training, user adaptation, and overcoming resistance. Disruptions during transitions can affect productivity, and the psychological impact on employees adapting to change should not be underestimated. Understanding these hidden costs is crucial for successful implementation.
What leads to wasted resources and messy implementations with new technologies?
Two main factors: lack of clear objectives and inadequate change management. Without defined goals, it’s hard to measure success or ROI, leading to misguided efforts. Poor change management creates chaos, with employees unclear about new systems and resistant to adopting them, resulting in failed implementations.
Why do you think AI-powered recruitment is overrated for niche skills?
AI recruitment shines with large data sets, improving efficiency for common roles. But for niche skills, where candidate pools are small, AI may not provide accurate matches or offer insights beyond what skilled recruiters can achieve.
Focused data might enhance AI effectiveness, but for now, AI recruitment doesn’t match the nuanced understanding human recruiters bring.
What are your thoughts on using virtual reality like the Metaverse for compliance training?
While VR can revolutionize training in certain areas, basic compliance training in non-hazardous environments doesn’t benefit much from this tech. Physical demonstrations often prove more effective, especially for practical safety training like fire drills, where real experience outweighs virtual simulations.
How does cutting through flashy fads in HR technology relate to making long-term talent investments?
Focusing on long-term talent investments means prioritizing tools that enhance real capabilities and job satisfaction over trendy but superficial technologies. It’s about deepening the employee experience and ensuring sustained growth rather than hopping on every new tech wave that promises quick fixes.
What is your perspective on future-proofing the work world with technology?
Future-proofing, while appealing, is a misnomer because we can’t predict the future accurately. Instead, investing in adaptable, scalable solutions tailored to present needs ensures readiness for change without overcommitting to uncertain trends.
Can you share cases where companies bought into technology hypes without actual need?
Many small to mid-sized companies rush to adopt predictive modeling despite minimal relevant data, hoping to appear cutting-edge. Spending heavily on underutilized e-learning platforms is another example, driven by hype rather than genuine employee engagement or actual training needs.
Why is the current state of development in AI-based hiring not ideal, considering smaller candidate pools?
AI’s effectiveness hinges on vast data. With smaller pools, AI struggles to deliver precise, valuable insights. This current state means AI may not significantly enhance recruitment efficiency or accuracy as expected in niche or specialized roles.
Why is the adoption rate of e-learning tools worldwide so low?
Employees often perceive e-learning as impersonal and less engaging compared to interactive, in-person training. Additionally, cultural and individual learning preferences, combined with technical accessibility issues, contribute to low adoption rates globally.
How should companies decide between physical and virtual induction programs for their employees?
Decisions should hinge on company size, geographic spread, and resources. For larger, dispersed teams, virtual programs offer consistency and convenience. Smaller, localized teams may benefit more from the personal touch and direct mentorship opportunities that physical programs provide.
What is your approach to technology companies continuously developing new tools?
We continuously evaluate technologies against our strategic goals. Key criteria include potential ROI, integration ease, and user feedback. Technologies that streamline processes, enhance user experience, or provide a significant competitive edge are prioritized.
What are the current loopholes in background verification tools?
Verification of previous employment remains challenging due to reliance on non-credible sources like LinkedIn. While tech can verify addresses or Aadhaar data through geotagging, human intervention is crucial for truly confirming past employment records and academic credentials.
Why is having a national repository of central records critical for background verification?
A centralized repository ensures quicker, more accurate verifications, reducing the administrative burden and delays associated with background checks. It enhances reliability and trust in the hiring process, especially in verifying academic and employment records.
Why do you think prices of HR tech products are so high?
Factors include high R&D costs, inflation, and the price spike from AI hype. Additionally, market dynamics, such as the need to attract venture capital and the network effect, contribute to inflated prices for HR tech products.
How does market perception of uncertainty increase the demand for HR tech?
Heightened uncertainty prompts organizations to seek tech solutions as a means of stability and future-proofing. This climate of fear and competitive pressure drives demand for HR tools that promise adaptability and resilience.
Do you have any advice for our readers?
Stay focused on your specific organizational needs. Evaluate technologies critically, prioritize those that genuinely add value, and don’t succumb to the allure of trends or competitor actions. Investing wisely in tech that aligns with your long-term goals will pave the way for sustainable growth and success.