Employees Prefer Human Connection in Learning and Development, Despite the Growing Acceptance of AI

In the dynamic world of workforce development, learning and development (L&D) plays a crucial role in shaping a skilled and adaptable workforce. Recently, there has been increasing interest in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in L&D functions, offering the potential for automation and efficiency. However, a recent survey has revealed that employees still value human connection and prefer instructor-led training, highlighting the need to strike a balance between AI and human involvement in L&D initiatives.

Preference for Instructor-led Training

The survey conducted among employees indicated that a significant majority, 59%, preferred having an instructor, whether physically present or virtual, to direct their workforce development training. This preference reflects their desire for human interaction and personalized guidance in the learning process. Despite advancements in technology, employees attach great importance to the expert guidance and support provided by instructors.

Moreover, the survey findings emphasized the importance of human connection in L&D. Employees crave personal interaction and value the ability to ask questions, receive immediate feedback, and engage in discussions with their instructors and peers. This preference indicates that the traditional instructor-led training model retains its relevance and effectiveness in meeting employees’ needs.

Subject Matter Expert vs. AI Content Development

In addition to the preference for instructor-led training, the survey also highlighted a strong inclination towards content developed by subject matter experts (SMEs) rather than AI. An overwhelming majority – 87% of respondents – expressed a desire for L&D content to be developed by SMEs. This preference underscores employees’ belief in the expertise and experience of human professionals in delivering relevant and tailored content.

While there is growing interest in AI-based content development, only a mere 12% of respondents indicated a preference for AI-generated content. This finding suggests that employees value the nuances, insights, and practicality that human expertise brings to L&D content. They recognize the importance of subject-matter expertise in creating meaningful and engaging learning experiences.

Growing Acceptance of AI in L&D

Despite the emphasis on human connection, the survey findings also point to a shift in the attitudes of L&D professionals towards the use of AI. More and more professionals are warming up to the idea of incorporating AI into their functions, recognizing its potential for enhancing efficiency and productivity.

The survey revealed that 64% of respondents agreed that using AI for administrative tasks in L&D would increase efficiency. AI, as an automation tool, can streamline administrative processes, freeing up L&D professionals to focus their efforts on more value-added activities such as curriculum design, instructional design, and learner support. By eliminating repetitive tasks, AI has the potential to enhance the overall effectiveness and impact of L&D initiatives.

Balancing AI and Human Efforts in L&D

While employees may prefer instructor-led training and content developed by subject matter experts (SMEs), the survey results also showed that they do not oppose L&D practitioners improving their efforts through AI. This indicates a willingness to embrace the benefits of AI while maintaining the human touch.

Finding a balance between AI and human involvement is crucial for effective workforce development. AI can complement human efforts by providing data-driven insights, personalized recommendations, and adaptive learning experiences. By leveraging AI as a powerful tool, L&D professionals can enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of their initiatives, ultimately benefiting employees and organizations alike.

The survey’s findings align with the widespread adoption of AI across various workplace functions. Nearly one-third of workplaces are actively using AI, highlighting its increasing presence in driving efficiency and innovation. As AI becomes more integrated into organizations, it is essential for L&D professionals to understand its potential and harness its capabilities to support their training initiatives.

In the ever-evolving landscape of L&D, it is crucial to consider employee preferences and needs. The recent survey has shed light on the continued importance of human connection and personalized guidance in workforce development training. While AI offers tremendous potential for automation and efficiency, employees still value the expertise of instructors and subject matter experts.

The key lies in nurturing a balance between AI and human involvement in L&D initiatives. L&D professionals can leverage AI as an automation tool to optimize administrative tasks, allowing them to focus on higher-value activities such as curriculum design, instructional design, and learner support. By embracing AI while preserving the human touch, organizations can create a holistic and effective learning experience for their workforce.

In this era of technological advancements, it is crucial to recognize that the human element remains at the core of successful L&D initiatives. The ongoing dialogue between AI and human involvement in learning and development will drive the future of workforce training, enabling organizations to continuously upskill and empower their employees.

Explore more

Global RPA Market Set for Rapid Growth Through 2033

The modern business environment has reached a definitive turning point where the distinction between human administrative effort and automated digital execution is blurring into a singular, cohesive workflow. As organizations navigate the complexities of a post-pandemic economic landscape in 2026, the reliance on Robotic Process Automation (RPA) has transitioned from a competitive advantage to a fundamental requirement for survival. This

US Labor Market Cools Following January Employment Surge

The sheer magnitude of the employment surge witnessed during the first month of the year has left economists questioning whether the American economy is truly overheating or simply experiencing a statistical anomaly. While January provided a blowout performance that defied most conservative forecasts, the subsequent data for February suggests that a significant cooling period is finally taking hold. This shift

Trend Analysis: Entry Level Remote Careers

The long-standing belief that securing a high-paying professional career requires a decade of office-bound grinding is being systematically dismantled by a digital-first economy that values specific output over physical attendance. For decades, the entry-level designation often implied a physical presence in a cubicle and years of preparatory internships, yet fresh data suggests that high-paying remote opportunities are now accessible to

How to Bridge Skills Gaps by Developing Internal Talent

The modern labor market presents a paradoxical challenge where specialized roles remain vacant for months while thousands of capable employees feel their professional growth has hit an impenetrable ceiling. This misalignment is not merely a recruitment issue but a systemic failure to recognize “adjacent-fit” talent—individuals who already possess the vast majority of required competencies but are overlooked due to rigid

Is Physical Disability a Barrier to Executive Leadership?

When a seasoned diplomat with a career spanning the United Nations and high-level corporate strategy enters a boardroom, the initial assessment by peers should theoretically rest upon a decade of proven crisis management and multi-million-dollar partnership successes. However, for many leaders who live with visible physical disabilities, the resume often faces an uphill battle against a deeply ingrained societal bias.