South Cambridgeshire District Council (SCDC) has faced intense scrutiny after a recent report highlighted a growing trend of employees taking up second jobs on their paid day off, with 16% of staff affected. This revelation has sparked a debate over the efficacy and implications of the four-day workweek model that SCDC has been trialing for the past two years. Independent Councillor Dan Lentell has voiced his concerns, stating that the practice of holding second jobs undermines the purpose of providing full-time compensation for what should be full-time dedication to council duties. Lentell, while supportive of transitioning to the four-in-seven working model, questions whether it achieves its intended goals.
The four-day workweek trial at SCDC ensures that employees receive full salaries even while working 80% of the traditional hours, on the condition that they complete 100% of their duties. However, the 2024 health and wellbeing survey by Robertson Cooper has indicated a rise in the number of employees, particularly those in the waste services team, who have taken on additional paid work. The council maintains that these second jobs were already common before the trial began, suggesting it is an entrenched issue rather than a consequence of the new work model. Yet, the increase presents potential challenges in examining the real benefits and possible detriments of the shortened workweek.
Concerns Over Service Quality and Employee Well-being
Critics of the four-day workweek trial, like Elliot Keck from the TaxPayers’ Alliance, argue that the model might compromise the quality of public services. Keck fears that employees juggling multiple jobs could lead to diminished service levels and heightened risk of employee burnout. His stance is that such outcomes would be counterproductive, affecting not only employee health but also the overall efficiency and reliability of council operations. Keck firmly believes that the trial should be concluded to prioritize high-standard public services and focus on the residents’ needs. He emphasizes that the added strain on employees is an unjustifiable cost, potentially neglecting the primary focus of council responsibilities.
Conversely, SCDC argues that second jobs are a common occurrence in the shared waste service sector and pre-date the four-day workweek trial. They claim that the recent data, showing increased numbers of second jobs, should not be surprising and does not directly correlate with the working model’s effectiveness. This standpoint aims to downplay the concerns raised, positioning the trend as an existing norm rather than a byproduct of the shortened workweek. With the upcoming deliberation on January 14, the council needs to address these conflicting views and examine how full-time compensation aligns with the dedication required for council roles.
Evaluating the Future of the Four-Day Workweek
South Cambridgeshire District Council (SCDC) is under scrutiny after a report revealed a growing trend of employees taking second jobs on their paid day off, affecting 16% of the staff. This has ignited a debate on the effectiveness and implications of the four-day workweek model that SCDC has been trialing for the past two years. Independent Councillor Dan Lentell expressed his concerns, arguing that taking second jobs undermines the concept of full-time pay for what should be full-time dedication to council duties. Lentell supports the shift to a four-day workweek but questions if it fulfills its intended goals.
The trial at SCDC allows employees to receive full salaries while working 80% of traditional hours, as long as they complete 100% of their duties. However, the 2024 health and wellbeing survey by Robertson Cooper noted an increase in employees, particularly in the waste services team, taking on additional paid work. The council asserts that second jobs were already common before the trial, suggesting this issue existed previously. Nonetheless, this increase raises questions about the true benefits and potential drawbacks of the shortened workweek.