Closing the Wage Gap: California’s Pay Data Reporting Requirements and Proposed Deadline Extension for Employers

The California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) has proposed a potential extension of two months for employers to comply with the state’s new pay data reporting requirements. The new reporting requirements under California’s pay transparency law have caused confusion among employers and labor contractors alike.

Current reporting deadline

The deadline for reporting obligations for workers hired through labor contractors is currently set for May 10, 2023. This means that private employers with 100 or more employees and/or workers supplied by contractors must file separate reports on pay, demographics, and other workforce data for both their employees and workers hired through contractors.

Enforcement Deferral Request

Employers can request an “enforcement deferral” by submitting an online request through the CRD’s pay data reporting portal. This is an option available to employers who are unable to comply with the reporting requirements by May 10, 2023. If approved, the deadline for compliance would be moved to July 10, 2023.

Proposed new deadline

The proposed extension for compliance would give employers an additional two months to comply with the new pay data reporting requirements. This would mean that employers have until July 10, 2023 to submit their reports. While the deadline for submitting pay data reports to the CRD remains May 10, 2023, the CRD may seek a court order for compliance after that date.

CRD Enforcement after May 10th

Employers who fail to comply with the reporting requirements by the May 10th deadline may face enforcement action from the CRD. The CRD may seek a court order to compel compliance, which could result in fines, penalties, or other consequences for noncompliant employers.

Confusion for Employers and Contractors

The new reporting requirements under California’s pay transparency law have caused confusion among both employers and labor contractors. The law requires employers to make direct comparisons of pay rates between different racial, ethnic, and gender groups, which can be a complex and challenging task.

Reporting requirements for employers

Private employers with 100 or more employees and/or workers supplied by contractors must submit a pay data report to the EEOC each year, regardless of whether they have filed a federal EEO-1 report. The report must include information on pay and hours worked, broken down by job category, gender, race, and ethnicity.

Effective date of the new pay data reporting requirements

The new pay data reporting requirements took effect on January 1, 2023, meaning that affected employers must comply with the reporting requirements for the first time in May 2023. This is a significant change that requires employers to make direct comparisons of pay rates between different racial, ethnic, and gender groups.

The new law impacts private employers with 100 or more employees in California, requiring them to submit a pay data report to the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) each year. The law aims to increase pay transparency and reduce pay disparities by shining a light on potential discriminatory pay practices.

Complying with California’s new pay data reporting requirements is essential for affected employers. While the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) has proposed an extension for compliance, employers should make every effort to meet the May 10th reporting deadline to avoid enforcement action from the DFEH. By submitting accurate and complete pay data reports, employers can demonstrate their commitment to fair and equitable pay practices in the workplace.

Explore more

Is Your Business Ready for New Harassment Prevention Laws?

Maintaining a meticulous audit trail of all preventative measures and investigations is becoming a prerequisite for a successful legal defense. This reality stems from a wave of legislative updates that have replaced the aging “severe or pervasive” standard with broader definitions of workplace misconduct. Today, a single instance of inappropriate behavior can lead to significant litigation if the employer cannot

Passive Windows Users Are Helping Microsoft Add Bloatware

Passive engagement with the Windows interface, such as clicking on widgets or web-integrated search results, is logged as an endorsement for further clutter in the File Explorer. This behavioral data collection creates a feedback loop where silence or accidental interaction is interpreted as a desire for more third-party integrations and algorithmic suggestions. As the operating system evolves in 2026, the

How Do Algorithms Change Social Media Marketing Rules?

Cultural fluency has become a competitive advantage for brands that can speak a platform’s native language without appearing disruptive to the user’s entertainment experience. The modern digital landscape operates almost exclusively on the interest graph, where sophisticated machine-learning models prioritize content relevance over established relationships. This structural pivot has forced a total departure from legacy marketing tactics, as the mere

How Is Maharashtra Modernizing Land Records Digitally?

The traditional maze of physical ledgers and manual verification processes that once defined land administration in Maharashtra is rapidly fading into history as the state embraces a sophisticated digital infrastructure. Geographic Information System analysis and Management Information System reporting provide real-time updates on the size, legal status, and current occupancy of government-owned land parcels. This high-level visibility allows the state

The Evolution of Automated Market Makers in Global Finance

Investors are increasingly moving toward a network-centric trading model where assets like Tesla tokens can be swapped directly for other equities without exiting to fiat currency. This systemic pivot represents a departure from the fragmented liquidity of the past decade, replacing manual brokering with autonomous protocols. Automated Market Makers, once considered experimental toys for the crypto-curious, have matured into robust