Closing the Wage Gap: California’s Pay Data Reporting Requirements and Proposed Deadline Extension for Employers

The California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) has proposed a potential extension of two months for employers to comply with the state’s new pay data reporting requirements. The new reporting requirements under California’s pay transparency law have caused confusion among employers and labor contractors alike.

Current reporting deadline

The deadline for reporting obligations for workers hired through labor contractors is currently set for May 10, 2023. This means that private employers with 100 or more employees and/or workers supplied by contractors must file separate reports on pay, demographics, and other workforce data for both their employees and workers hired through contractors.

Enforcement Deferral Request

Employers can request an “enforcement deferral” by submitting an online request through the CRD’s pay data reporting portal. This is an option available to employers who are unable to comply with the reporting requirements by May 10, 2023. If approved, the deadline for compliance would be moved to July 10, 2023.

Proposed new deadline

The proposed extension for compliance would give employers an additional two months to comply with the new pay data reporting requirements. This would mean that employers have until July 10, 2023 to submit their reports. While the deadline for submitting pay data reports to the CRD remains May 10, 2023, the CRD may seek a court order for compliance after that date.

CRD Enforcement after May 10th

Employers who fail to comply with the reporting requirements by the May 10th deadline may face enforcement action from the CRD. The CRD may seek a court order to compel compliance, which could result in fines, penalties, or other consequences for noncompliant employers.

Confusion for Employers and Contractors

The new reporting requirements under California’s pay transparency law have caused confusion among both employers and labor contractors. The law requires employers to make direct comparisons of pay rates between different racial, ethnic, and gender groups, which can be a complex and challenging task.

Reporting requirements for employers

Private employers with 100 or more employees and/or workers supplied by contractors must submit a pay data report to the EEOC each year, regardless of whether they have filed a federal EEO-1 report. The report must include information on pay and hours worked, broken down by job category, gender, race, and ethnicity.

Effective date of the new pay data reporting requirements

The new pay data reporting requirements took effect on January 1, 2023, meaning that affected employers must comply with the reporting requirements for the first time in May 2023. This is a significant change that requires employers to make direct comparisons of pay rates between different racial, ethnic, and gender groups.

The new law impacts private employers with 100 or more employees in California, requiring them to submit a pay data report to the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) each year. The law aims to increase pay transparency and reduce pay disparities by shining a light on potential discriminatory pay practices.

Complying with California’s new pay data reporting requirements is essential for affected employers. While the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) has proposed an extension for compliance, employers should make every effort to meet the May 10th reporting deadline to avoid enforcement action from the DFEH. By submitting accurate and complete pay data reports, employers can demonstrate their commitment to fair and equitable pay practices in the workplace.

Explore more

How Companies Can Fix the 2026 AI Customer Experience Crisis

The frustration of spending twenty minutes trapped in a digital labyrinth only to have a chatbot claim it does not understand basic English has become the defining failure of modern corporate strategy. When a customer navigates a complex self-service menu only to be told the system lacks the capacity to assist, the immediate consequence is not merely annoyance; it is

Customer Experience Must Shift From Philosophy to Operations

The decorative posters that once adorned corporate hallways with platitudes about customer-centricity are finally being replaced by the cold, hard reality of operational spreadsheets and real-time performance data. This paradox suggests a grim reality for modern business leaders: the traditional approach to customer experience isn’t just stalled; it is actively failing to meet the demands of a high-stakes economy. Organizations

Strategies and Tools for the 2026 DevSecOps Landscape

The persistent tension between rapid software deployment and the necessity for impenetrable security protocols has fundamentally reshaped how digital architectures are constructed and maintained within the contemporary technological environment. As organizations grapple with the reality of constant delivery cycles, the old ways of protecting data and infrastructure are proving insufficient. In the current era, where the gap between code commit

Observability Transforms Continuous Testing in Cloud DevOps

Software engineering teams often wake up to the harsh reality that a pristine green dashboard in the staging environment offers zero protection against a catastrophic failure in the live production cloud. This disconnect represents a fundamental shift in the digital landscape where the “it worked in staging” excuse has become a relic of a simpler era. Despite a suite of

The Shift From Account-Based to Agent-Based Marketing

Modern B2B procurement cycles are no longer initiated by human executives browsing LinkedIn or attending trade shows but by autonomous digital researchers that process millions of data points in seconds. These digital intermediaries act as tireless gatekeepers, sifting through white papers, technical documentation, and peer reviews long before a human decision-maker ever sees a branded slide deck. The transition from