Closing the Wage Gap: California’s Pay Data Reporting Requirements and Proposed Deadline Extension for Employers

The California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) has proposed a potential extension of two months for employers to comply with the state’s new pay data reporting requirements. The new reporting requirements under California’s pay transparency law have caused confusion among employers and labor contractors alike.

Current reporting deadline

The deadline for reporting obligations for workers hired through labor contractors is currently set for May 10, 2023. This means that private employers with 100 or more employees and/or workers supplied by contractors must file separate reports on pay, demographics, and other workforce data for both their employees and workers hired through contractors.

Enforcement Deferral Request

Employers can request an “enforcement deferral” by submitting an online request through the CRD’s pay data reporting portal. This is an option available to employers who are unable to comply with the reporting requirements by May 10, 2023. If approved, the deadline for compliance would be moved to July 10, 2023.

Proposed new deadline

The proposed extension for compliance would give employers an additional two months to comply with the new pay data reporting requirements. This would mean that employers have until July 10, 2023 to submit their reports. While the deadline for submitting pay data reports to the CRD remains May 10, 2023, the CRD may seek a court order for compliance after that date.

CRD Enforcement after May 10th

Employers who fail to comply with the reporting requirements by the May 10th deadline may face enforcement action from the CRD. The CRD may seek a court order to compel compliance, which could result in fines, penalties, or other consequences for noncompliant employers.

Confusion for Employers and Contractors

The new reporting requirements under California’s pay transparency law have caused confusion among both employers and labor contractors. The law requires employers to make direct comparisons of pay rates between different racial, ethnic, and gender groups, which can be a complex and challenging task.

Reporting requirements for employers

Private employers with 100 or more employees and/or workers supplied by contractors must submit a pay data report to the EEOC each year, regardless of whether they have filed a federal EEO-1 report. The report must include information on pay and hours worked, broken down by job category, gender, race, and ethnicity.

Effective date of the new pay data reporting requirements

The new pay data reporting requirements took effect on January 1, 2023, meaning that affected employers must comply with the reporting requirements for the first time in May 2023. This is a significant change that requires employers to make direct comparisons of pay rates between different racial, ethnic, and gender groups.

The new law impacts private employers with 100 or more employees in California, requiring them to submit a pay data report to the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) each year. The law aims to increase pay transparency and reduce pay disparities by shining a light on potential discriminatory pay practices.

Complying with California’s new pay data reporting requirements is essential for affected employers. While the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) has proposed an extension for compliance, employers should make every effort to meet the May 10th reporting deadline to avoid enforcement action from the DFEH. By submitting accurate and complete pay data reports, employers can demonstrate their commitment to fair and equitable pay practices in the workplace.

Explore more

How Can HR Resist Senior Pressure to Hire the Unqualified?

The request usually arrives with a deceptive sense of urgency and the heavy weight of authority when a senior executive suggests a “perfect candidate” who happens to lack every required credential for the role. In these high-pressure moments, Human Resources professionals find themselves caught in a professional vice, squeezed between their duty to uphold organizational integrity and the direct orders

Why Strategy Beats Standardized Healthcare Marketing

When a private surgical center invests six figures into a digital presence only to find their schedule remains half-empty, the culprit is rarely a lack of technical effort but rather a total absence of strategic differentiation. This phenomenon illustrates the most expensive mistake a medical practice can make: assuming that a high-performing campaign for one clinic will yield identical results

Why In-Person Events Are the Ultimate B2B Marketing Tool

A mountain of leads generated by a sophisticated digital campaign might look impressive on a spreadsheet, yet it often fails to persuade a skeptical executive to authorize a complex contract requiring deep institutional trust. Digital marketing can generate high volume, but the most influential transactions are moving away from the screen and back into the physical room. In an era

Hybrid Models Redefine the Future of Wealth Management

The long-standing friction between automated algorithms and human expertise is finally dissolving into a sophisticated partnership that prioritizes client outcomes over technological purity. For over a decade, the financial sector remained fixated on a zero-sum game, debating whether the rise of the robo-advisor would eventually render the human professional obsolete. Recent market shifts suggest this was the wrong question to

Is Tune Talk Shop the Future of Mobile E-Commerce?

The traditional mobile application once served as a cold, digital ledger where users spent mere seconds checking data balances or paying monthly bills before quickly exiting. Today, a seismic shift in consumer behavior is redefining that experience, as Tune Talk users now spend an average of 36 minutes daily engaged within a single ecosystem. This level of immersion suggests that