Che Garibaldi Ordered to Pay $140,000 in Back Wages and Damages; Allegations of Using Priest to Force Workers to Confess “Workplace Sins”

Che Garibaldi, the owner and operator of Taqueria Garibaldi, has been ordered by a federal court to pay $140,000 in back wages and damages to 35 restaurant employees. This ruling comes after allegations surfaced that the establishment used a priest to coerce workers into confessing their supposed “workplace sins.” The incident has drawn attention and condemnation from the U.S. Department of Labor for its audacious attempt to intimidate and retaliate against employees.

Background

During the litigation process initiated by the U.S. Department of Labor, an employee of Che Garibaldi testified in court about the priest’s involvement. According to the employee, the priest urged workers to “get the sins out,” creating an uncomfortable and coercive environment for the employees. The department’s Wage and Hour Division launched an investigation, which ultimately uncovered multiple violations committed by Taqueria Garibaldi.

Department of Labor’s response

In a press release, the U.S. Department of Labor expressed outrage at the actions of Che Garibaldi, labeling them as “among the most shameless” ways to intimidate and retaliate against employees. The department highlighted the severity of the situation and emphasized its commitment to holding employers accountable for their actions.

Violations found

The investigation conducted by the Wage and Hour Division of the U.S. Department of Labor uncovered several violations committed by Taqueria Garibaldi. Firstly, the restaurant was found guilty of denying employees overtime pay for any hours worked beyond 40 in a workweek, a direct violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Additionally, the establishment had been illegally distributing employee tips to managers, further infringing on the rights and entitlements of their workforce. The division also discovered that the employer had been making threats of retaliation and adverse immigration consequences against employees who cooperated with the department’s investigation. Shockingly, one employee was fired for merely filing a complaint with the department against the restaurant.

Testimony of Employees

In court, an employee of Taqueria Garibaldi provided detailed testimony regarding the restaurant’s use of a supposed priest to hear workplace “sins.” This questionable practice added a further layer of coercion and discomfort for the workers, deepening the hostile work environment they were subjected to. Additionally, other employees reported that a manager had falsely claimed that the department’s investigation would result in immigration issues, using fear as a means to discourage cooperation.

Employer’s Intentions

The actions taken by Taqueria Garibaldi expose a disgraceful attempt to retaliate against employees and silence them. By employing a priest to force workers into confessing their “workplace sins,” the restaurant sought to obstruct the department’s investigation and prevent the recovery of unpaid wages. These manipulative tactics demonstrate a complete disregard for the well-being and rights of the employees.

Court’s decision

As a result of the investigation conducted by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division, the court has ruled in favor of the 35 restaurant employees affected. Che Garibaldi has been ordered to pay $140,000 in back wages and damages, providing some form of justice for the mistreated workers. This decision serves as a significant warning to other employers engaging in illegal and exploitative practices.

Taqueria Garibaldi, owned and operated by Chef Garibaldi, has been found guilty of multiple violations, including denying overtime pay, illegally distributing employee tips, and threatening employees with retaliation and adverse immigration consequences. The ruling handed down by the federal court emphasizes the importance of upholding fair labor practices and protecting the rights of workers. The U.S. Department of Labor’s investigation played a crucial role in holding the restaurant accountable for its reprehensible actions. This case serves as a reminder to employers that exploitation and retaliation against employees will not go unpunished.

Explore more

Is 2026 the Year of 5G for Latin America?

The Dawning of a New Connectivity Era The year 2026 is shaping up to be a watershed moment for fifth-generation mobile technology across Latin America. After years of planning, auctions, and initial trials, the region is on the cusp of a significant acceleration in 5G deployment, driven by a confluence of regulatory milestones, substantial investment commitments, and a strategic push

EU Set to Ban High-Risk Vendors From Critical Networks

The digital arteries that power European life, from instant mobile communications to the stability of the energy grid, are undergoing a security overhaul of unprecedented scale. After years of gentle persuasion and cautionary advice, the European Union is now poised to enact a sweeping mandate that will legally compel member states to remove high-risk technology suppliers from their most critical

AI Avatars Are Reshaping the Global Hiring Process

The initial handshake of a job interview is no longer a given; for a growing number of candidates, the first face they see is a digital one, carefully designed to ask questions, gauge responses, and represent a company on a global, 24/7 scale. This shift from human-to-human conversation to a human-to-AI interaction marks a pivotal moment in talent acquisition. For

Recruitment CRM vs. Applicant Tracking System: A Comparative Analysis

The frantic search for top talent has transformed recruitment from a simple act of posting jobs into a complex, strategic function demanding sophisticated tools. In this high-stakes environment, two categories of software have become indispensable: the Recruitment CRM and the Applicant Tracking System. Though often used interchangeably, these platforms serve fundamentally different purposes, and understanding their distinct roles is crucial

Could Your Star Recruit Lead to a Costly Lawsuit?

The relentless pursuit of top-tier talent often leads companies down a path of aggressive courtship, but a recent court ruling serves as a stark reminder that this path is fraught with hidden and expensive legal risks. In the high-stakes world of executive recruitment, the line between persuading a candidate and illegally inducing them is dangerously thin, and crossing it can