Apple Inc. Pays Record $25 Million Settlement over Alleged Illegal Hiring Violations

Apple Inc. has reached a settlement with the Department of Justice (DOJ), agreeing to pay $25 million over allegations of engaging in illegal hiring practices. The settlement, announced in a press release by the DOJ, concludes a lengthy investigation into Apple’s non-compliance with the Program Electronic Review Management (PERM) program requirements.

Allegations of Non-compliance

The DOJ investigation revealed that Apple failed to adhere to the guidelines set forth by the PERM program. Specifically, the company was found to have not recruited U.S. citizens or green card holders for the positions it sought to fill through the PERM program. This violation raised concerns about potential discrimination in the hiring process.

Failure to Recruit Suitable Candidates

One of the key requirements of the PERM program is to recruit qualified individuals from the domestic labor market before considering foreign workers. However, Apple was found to have neglected this crucial step, failing to prioritize the recruitment of U.S. citizens or green card holders for the positions it sought to fill.

Failure to Advertise Positions

In addition to the failure to recruit suitable candidates, Apple also neglected to advertise the PERM positions on its external job website, as required by the PERM program. This omission limited the exposure of these positions to potential local candidates, potentially undermining equal opportunities for American workers.

Paper Applications for PERM Positions

Another violation identified in the investigation was Apple’s insistence on paper applications for PERM positions, while allowing electronic applications for other positions within the company. This discrepancy raised questions about the fairness and accessibility of the application process for candidates seeking PERM positions at Apple.

Apple’s Acknowledgment and Statement

In a statement following the settlement, Apple acknowledged that it had unintentionally not been following the DOJ standard in its hiring practices. The company expressed regret for its actions and stated its commitment to rectify the situation. Apple emphasized its dedication to ensuring fair and equal employment opportunities for all candidates.

Settlement Details

As part of the settlement, Apple has agreed to pay a total of $25 million. This amount represents the largest award the DOJ has recovered under the anti-discrimination provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Of the total settlement amount, $18.25 million will be deposited into a fund designated for eligible discrimination victims as back pay. This provision aims to compensate those who may have been affected by Apple’s non-compliance with the PERM program. Additionally, $6.75 million will cover civil penalties for the violations committed.

Compliance Agreement for Future Recruitment

Under the terms of the settlement, Apple is required to ensure that its recruitment practices for PERM positions align more closely with its standard recruitment practices. This agreement seeks to promote fairness, transparency, and equal opportunity in Apple’s hiring processes, particularly for roles filled through the PERM program.

The settlement between Apple Inc. and the DOJ brings an end to the allegations of illegal hiring practices. The $25 million settlement serves as a reminder of the importance of complying with government regulations and the consequences that can arise from non-compliance. Going forward, Apple will need to make appropriate adjustments to its recruitment practices to ensure that the requirements of the PERM program are met, promoting fairness and equal opportunities in the hiring process.

Explore more

How Small Businesses Can Master Payroll and Compliance

The moment an ambitious founder signs the paperwork for their very first hire, they unwittingly step across an invisible threshold from simple entrepreneurship into the high-stakes arena of federal and state tax regulation. This transition is often quiet, masked by the excitement of a growing team and the urgent demands of a scaling product. Yet, beneath the surface of that

Is AI the Problem or Is It How We Use It in Hiring?

A job seeker spends an entire Sunday afternoon meticulously tailoring a resume and answering complex behavioral prompts, only to receive a standardized rejection email less than ninety minutes after clicking submit. This “two-hour rejection” has become a defining characteristic of the modern job market, creating a profound sense of alienation among professionals who feel they are screaming into a digital

Is Generative AI Slowing Down the Recruitment Process?

The traditional handshake between talent and opportunity has morphed into a high-stakes digital standoff where algorithmic speed creates massive human resource bottlenecks. While generative artificial intelligence promised to streamline the matching of candidates to roles, it has instead ignited a digital arms race that threatens to bury hiring managers under a mountain of synthetic perfection. Today, the ease of generating

AI Use by Job Seekers Slows Down the Hiring Process

The global labor market is currently facing an unprecedented crisis where the very tools designed to accelerate professional connections are instead creating a massive digital bottleneck in the talent pipeline. While the initial promise of generative artificial intelligence was to streamline the match between skills and vacancies, the reality in 2026 has shifted toward a high-stakes game of algorithmic hide-and-seek.

Is AI Eliminating the Entry-Level Career Path?

The traditional corporate hierarchy is currently navigating a foundational structural shift that threatens to dismantle the decades-old “entry-level gateway” once used by every aspiring professional to launch a career. As of 2026, the modern workplace is no longer a predictable ladder where young graduates perform foundational tasks to earn their climb; instead, it has become an automated landscape where cognitive