Addressing Race in the Workplace: A Justice-Centered Approach

The issue of race in the workplace is complex and multifaceted, and it requires a justice-centered approach to achieve meaningful progress. In this article, we will explore some ways in which companies can address and counteract the effects of systemic discrimination and bias.

Historical Context: The Legal Discrimination of Job Ads

It is important to acknowledge that until the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it was legal to include discriminatory language in job advertisements. Phrases such as “blacks need not apply” were not uncommon, and they served as a stark reminder of the systemic racism prevalent in the workplace. Although such overt discrimination is now illegal, subtle biases and prejudices still exist in recruitment and hiring practices.

Justice-Centered Approach: Screening and Interpreting Job Descriptions

To root out these biases, companies must take a justice-centered approach to job descriptions. This process involves screening job descriptions for gendered or biased wording, and questioning the relevance of certain requirements. For example, does a job really require a specific degree or certification, or is it simply a way to exclude certain types of candidates? By critically examining job descriptions in this way, companies can create a more inclusive and diverse workforce.

Demonstrating Commitment to Justice: Requirements for a Diverse Workplace

In addition to removing biased language from job descriptions, companies can demonstrate their commitment to justice by including specific requirements related to diversity and inclusion. For example, companies could require candidates to exhibit a flexible communication style and the ability to work with diverse communities. They could also require candidates to have experience working on diverse teams and demonstrate an understanding of institutional racism and bias. By setting these requirements, companies would demonstrate that diversity and inclusion are important values for the organization.

Overcoming Financial Barriers: Policies for Historically Marginalized Employees

Historically marginalized employees often face financial barriers that can prevent them from advancing in their careers. For example, policies that require employees to pay for courses and be reimbursed after successful completion may prove difficult for those from economically challenged backgrounds. To address this issue, companies can provide resources and support to help employees overcome financial barriers. This might include providing upfront funding for training or professional development courses, or offering low-interest loans or grants for education or skills training.

Reframing Performance Reviews Around Justice

Performance reviews are another area where HR leaders can reframe their approach around justice. Traditional annual performance reviews can exacerbate existing imbalances and disparities, especially if they are based on subjective criteria or assessed by biased managers. In light of these discrepancies, some companies like Adobe, Deloitte, and General Electric have moved away from annual performance reviews in favor of more frequent check-ins focused on actionable feedback. By adopting this approach, companies can ensure that their performance review process is fair and objective.

Retirement Savings Disparities: A Justice Lens

Retirement savings is another area that requires a justice lens. Research has consistently shown that people of color have lower retirement savings than their white counterparts. This disparity is partly due to systemic discrimination and lack of access to high-paying jobs, but it can also be exacerbated by biased retirement and investment policies. Companies can address this issue by providing access to financial planners who are attuned to racial savings disparities. They can also implement policies like automatic enrollment, providing matching incentives, and offering lifetime annuities or lifetime income to help level the playing field.

Transparency and Trust: Adapting Hiring Campaigns as a Justice-Centered Company

Finally, it is important to acknowledge that building a justice-centered company requires transparency and trust. Companies that are genuinely committed to diversity and inclusion must be transparent in their efforts and reasons for implementing certain policies. When companies take steps to address systemic issues in the workplace, they should clearly communicate their efforts to employees and stakeholders. This openness and honesty can go a long way towards building trust and establishing a strong reputation for being a justice-centered company.

Addressing race in the workplace is a complex issue that requires a justice-centered approach. Companies must scrutinize their hiring and recruitment practices, reframe the performance review process, and provide resources and support to address financial barriers. By doing so, they can create a more equitable and inclusive workplace that benefits everyone and moves us toward a more just and fair society.

Explore more

Trend Analysis: AI in Real Estate

Navigating the real estate market has long been synonymous with staggering costs, opaque processes, and a reliance on commission-based intermediaries that can consume a significant portion of a property’s value. This traditional framework is now facing a profound disruption from artificial intelligence, a technological force empowering consumers with unprecedented levels of control, transparency, and financial savings. As the industry stands

Insurtech Digital Platforms – Review

The silent drain on an insurer’s profitability often goes unnoticed, buried within the complex and aging architecture of legacy systems that impede growth and alienate a digitally native customer base. Insurtech digital platforms represent a significant advancement in the insurance sector, offering a clear path away from these outdated constraints. This review will explore the evolution of this technology from

Trend Analysis: Insurance Operational Control

The relentless pursuit of market share that has defined the insurance landscape for years has finally met its reckoning, forcing the industry to confront a new reality where operational discipline is the true measure of strength. After a prolonged period of chasing aggressive, unrestrained growth, 2025 has marked a fundamental pivot. The market is now shifting away from a “growth-at-all-costs”

AI Grading Tools Offer Both Promise and Peril

The familiar scrawl of a teacher’s red pen, once the definitive symbol of academic feedback, is steadily being replaced by the silent, instantaneous judgment of an algorithm. From the red-inked margins of yesteryear to the instant feedback of today, the landscape of academic assessment is undergoing a seismic shift. As educators grapple with growing class sizes and the demand for

Legacy Digital Twin vs. Industry 4.0 Digital Twin: A Comparative Analysis

The promise of a perfect digital replica—a tool that could mirror every gear turn and temperature fluctuation of a physical asset—is no longer a distant vision but a bifurcated reality with two distinct evolutionary paths. On one side stands the legacy digital twin, a powerful but often isolated marvel of engineering simulation. On the other is its successor, the Industry