Are AI Models Changing the Game for Climate Risk in Insurance?

The increasing frequency and severity of extreme weather events have put immense pressure on the insurance industry, compelling insurers to rethink their traditional risk assessment models. Artificial Intelligence (AI), often seen as a transformative technology, is now being considered crucial for managing climate-related losses. According to a recent survey conducted by ZestyAI, a significant 73% of insurers regard AI as indispensable in dealing with climate risks. This survey, which comprised responses from 200 senior executives in Property & Casualty insurance, indicated a clear trend toward the adoption of AI and machine learning models. The responses reveal the industry’s growing reliance on AI for evaluating specific climate risks, with a notable 25% of insurers now using AI to assess the risk associated with severe storms.

One of the most important aspects of this trend is the adoption of AI for the assessment of convective storms, utilized by approximately 25% of insurers, and wildfire risks, used by 18%. However, despite this increased reliance on AI, traditional methods like stochastic models and actuarial data still hold significant ground in the industry. The survey results show that 45% of respondents rely on stochastic models for storm risk assessment, while 54% favor traditional actuarial models for analyzing wildfire risks. This dual approach indicates that while AI is making inroads, the insurance industry is cautious about abandoning conventional methods entirely.

Debate Over Model Accuracy

The debate over the accuracy of various risk assessment models is very much alive within the industry. While 27% of insurance professionals believe that traditional actuarial models offer the most reliable predictions, 26% argue in favor of stochastic models. Notably, 20% of respondents view AI and machine learning models as the most accurate in predicting climate-related risks. Interestingly, there is no overwhelming consensus, with 27% suggesting that a combined approach yields the best predictive accuracy. This fragmentation in opinion underscores the ongoing debate about the most effective methods for tackling climate risks and highlights the complexity of climate risk management.

In response to rising insured storm losses, which escalated from $30 billion in 2022 to over $50 billion in 2023 in the United States, the prioritization of storm damage assessment has intensified. Among the surveyed departments, 34% of actuary, product management, and underwriting professionals identified severe storms as their most pressing concern. The prioritization aligns with the observed increase in storm-related losses, reflecting a heightened focus on refining predictive models for this category of climate risk.

Factors Influencing AI Adoption

When it comes to selecting predictive AI models, several factors influence insurers’ decisions. The widespread adoption of a particular model within the industry emerged as the top criterion, with 45% of respondents citing it as a significant influence. Close behind is the adoption by trusted peers, deemed essential by 40% of the surveyed executives. Cost considerations also play a crucial role, influencing 37% of the respondents. Interestingly, regulatory approval and model transparency were rated lower, influencing 31% and 20% of the participants, respectively. These findings suggest that while regulatory compliance and transparency are important, the collective experience and judgment of the industry hold more sway in decision-making processes.

The positive outlook on AI in the insurance industry is worth noting. An impressive 80% of industry leaders believe that AI opens up new opportunities for profitable growth. Meanwhile, 73% predict that insurers equipped with AI will outperform their competitors. Among those who have already integrated AI into their risk models, 81% consider themselves ahead in adapting to climate challenges, compared to 66% who rely on traditional models. This optimism indicates that AI is perceived not only as a tool for managing risks but also as a competitive advantage in the evolving landscape of climate risk management.

The Path Forward

The increasing frequency and intensity of extreme weather events have placed significant strain on the insurance industry, prompting a reassessment of traditional risk assessment models. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is emerging as a critical tool in managing climate-related financial losses. A recent survey by ZestyAI highlights that 73% of insurers see AI as essential for handling climate risks. The survey involved 200 senior executives in Property & Casualty insurance and pointed to a clear shift towards AI and machine learning models. This trend is evidenced by 25% of insurers now using AI to evaluate severe storm risks.

Moreover, AI adoption is notable for assessing convective storms, with 25% of insurers applying it, and for wildfire risks, with 18% utilizing these advanced technologies. Despite the growing reliance on AI, traditional methods such as stochastic models and actuarial data remain prevalent. The survey shows that 45% of insurers still depend on stochastic models for storm risk assessment, while 54% rely on traditional actuarial models for analyzing wildfire risks. This dual approach suggests that while AI is gaining traction, the insurance industry is cautiously balancing it with tried-and-true methods.

Explore more

SAP Patches Critical Code Injection Flaw in S/4HANA

A single vulnerability hidden within a core enterprise application can unravel an organization’s entire security posture, and SAP’s latest security bulletin underscores this reality with alarming clarity. This is not just another monthly cycle of software maintenance; the February 2026 Security Patch Day is a critical call to action for enterprises worldwide. With 26 new Security Notes, the bulletin addresses

Why Are Microsoft 365 Admins Locked Out in NA?

With us today is Dominic Jainy, an IT professional whose expertise in AI and blockchain offers a unique perspective on the intricate systems powering today’s enterprises. We’re diving into the recent Microsoft 365 admin center outage that impacted thousands of administrators across North America, exploring its cascading effects, the specific challenges it posed for businesses of all sizes, and what

ILOVEPOOP Toolkit Exploits React2Shell Vulnerability

The window between the disclosure of a critical software vulnerability and its widespread exploitation has collapsed to mere hours, a reality starkly illustrated by the recent React2Shell crisis. This research summary analyzes the “ILOVEPOOP” toolkit, a sophisticated framework that rapidly began exploiting the critical React2Shell vulnerability (CVE-2025-55182). The following sections address the toolkit’s operational mechanics, its underlying infrastructure, and its

Ivanti EPM Vulnerabilities – Review

The widespread deployment of comprehensive IT management platforms has created a centralized point of control for enterprises, but it has also introduced a highly attractive target for malicious actors seeking to compromise entire networks. Ivanti’s Endpoint Manager (EPM) represents a significant component in enterprise IT infrastructure management. This review will explore two recently disclosed, critical vulnerabilities, their technical specifications, potential

Fake 7-Zip Installer Turns PCs Into Proxy Nodes

A seemingly harmless download of a widely trusted utility has become the entry point for a sophisticated campaign that quietly transforms personal computers into unwitting accomplices for cybercriminals. The threat exploits the reputation of the popular 7-Zip file archiver, luring unsuspecting individuals into installing a trojanized version that enlists their machines into a residential proxy network. This guide breaks down