In one of the most high-profile employment discrimination cases of recent years, Levi Strauss & Co. found itself in the spotlight when a former executive alleged that bias played a decisive role in her stagnation within the company. The executive, who had started at Levi Strauss as a manager in 2012 and reached the director level by 2017, claimed that
Recent developments within the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) signal potential shifts, elevating discourse surrounding religious rights in federal employment regulations. The appointment of Shannon Royce as chief of staff under acting chair Andrea Lucas emerges as a focal point of this change. Royce, formerly president of the Christian Employers Alliance (CEA), brings a nuanced perspective to the table.
The complexities surrounding anxiety-related claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) have increased, challenging employers to navigate a landscape that demands empathy as well as legal awareness. The case of Jamilah Way, a former attorney from Missouri City, Texas, exemplifies the intricacies involved when an employee alleges ADA violations, including the failure to provide reasonable accommodations for anxiety and
Recent developments in employment law raise pressing questions about how remote workers can seek legal recourse for discrimination across state lines. An illustrative case involves a former KPMG manager residing in Georgia who was permitted by the court to file a lawsuit under New York state and local laws. Remote work policies have expanded dramatically, primarily during the COVID-19 pandemic,
President Trump’s recent executive order, signed on April 23, introduces a considerable shift in the application of disparate impact theory within federal civil rights laws. This move repositions enforcement priorities away from diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts toward merit-based initiatives, challenging fundamental aspects of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. The dual aspects of disparate treatment and disparate
Workplace harassment remains one of the most pressing issues for employers today, with legal consequences and moral obligations at the forefront. The case of Remington of Montrose Golf Club, involving two female servers facing sexual harassment from an assistant manager, elucidates the critical nature of how employers respond to such complaints. It is not merely about addressing the immediate issues
Handling employees who consistently take genuine sick leave or are medically unfit to perform their jobs is a complex issue that many employers face. The case of DQJ v. The Commissioner of the Inland Revenue Department in New Zealand sheds light on the importance of adhering to fair and legal processes in these scenarios. This case involved an employee who
President Donald Trump’s early administrative actions created significant tension regarding gender identity recognition in the workplace. Executive Order 14168, issued early in Trump’s presidency, aimed at eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, which had previously embraced the recognition of multiple gender identities beyond the traditional male and female classifications. As Acting Chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC),
The U.S. Supreme Court is currently reviewing a landmark reverse gender discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to assess whether legal protections extend equally to all groups. This case, brought forward by Marlean Ames, a heterosexual female, asserts that she faced discrimination by the Ohio Department of Youth Services (DYS) because of her sexual
In a significant ruling, the Texas Supreme Court has clarified what constitutes a “disability” under the Texas Labor Code, specifically Section 21.002(6), establishing a higher standard for proving such claims. The case in question involved Sheri Kowalski, a hospital employee in Dallas, who contended that she was terminated due to severe neck pain, which she argued was a disability affecting
The legal battle of Ashley Howell against the Department of State Hospitals (DSH) under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) represents a significant challenge in addressing disability discrimination in the workplace.Howell’s termination from DSH amidst disputed health disclosures and a history of trauma has sparked crucial discussions about employer responsibilities and employee rights. This case illustrates the complexities of
One of the core tenets of Wisconsin’s Social Media Protection Act is the prohibition against employers requesting or demanding personal account login information from employees. This includes access to private content on social media accounts, private online communications, direct messages, and personal emails. The Act unequivocally forbids employers from refusing to hire, terminating, or discriminating against individuals who resist providing
