Warning: North Korean Lazarus Group Exploiting ManageEngine Vulnerability, Targeting Healthcare Sector

Federal authorities have issued a warning about the “significant risk” of potential attacks on healthcare and public health sector entities by the North Korean state-sponsored Lazarus Group. These cybercriminals have been targeting the healthcare industry by exploiting a critical vulnerability in 24 ManageEngine IT management tools from Zoho.

Alert details

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Health Sector Cybersecurity Coordination Center (HHS HC3) has recently released an alert regarding the activities of the Lazarus Group. This cybercriminal group has been focusing its attacks on internet backbone infrastructure and healthcare entities in Europe and the United States.

The vulnerability that is being exploited by the Lazarus Group is referred to as CVE-2022-47966. This critical vulnerability enables the attackers to gain unauthorized access and control over the ManageEngine software.

Vulnerability exploitation

The vulnerability tracked as CVE-2022-47966 can be exploited if the SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language) single sign-on is or has ever been enabled in the ManageEngine setup. This weakness allows attackers to deploy the remote access Trojan QuiteRAT, which gives them remote control over the compromised systems.

Connection to the Lazarus Group

According to HHS HC3, the attackers are using a remote access Trojan called QuiteRAT, which is believed to be connected to the Jupiter/EarlyRAT malware family. This malware family has been previously associated with the Lazarus Group’s subgroup known as Andariel. These connections strengthen the evidence linking these attacks to the Lazarus Group.

Recognition by authorities

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has added the CVE-2022-47966 flaw to its catalog of known exploited vulnerabilities, highlighting the seriousness of the vulnerability. In September, CISA and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) jointly released a bulletin warning of nation-state-sponsored actors exploiting this specific vulnerability in ManageEngine.

Previous reports on the vulnerability

Security researchers at Cisco Talos have been tracking the evolving threats posed by the Lazarus Group. In an August blog post, they highlighted the impact of the ManageEngine CVE-2022-47966 vulnerability. This vulnerability has gained attention due to its exploitation by the Lazarus Group in their targeted attacks.

Additionally, Caitlin Condon, the head of vulnerability research at security firm Rapid7, points out that various ManageEngine vulnerabilities have been exploited by different threat actors in the past several years. This indicates the ongoing challenges faced by healthcare and public health sector entities regarding their cybersecurity posture.

Overall threat landscape

The healthcare and public health sector entities are facing numerous serious threat actors, as emphasized by Caitlin Condon. These entities have become prime targets for cybercriminals due to the sensitive and valuable data they possess. Moreover, the reliance on interconnected systems and the rise of remote work in the healthcare sector have further increased their vulnerability to cyberattacks.

The warning from federal authorities regarding the Lazarus Group’s exploitation of the ManageEngine vulnerability is a crucial reminder of the need for robust cybersecurity measures in the healthcare and public health sector. Ongoing vigilance, prompt patch management, and the adoption of best practices are essential to protect against evolving cyber threats. It is vital for healthcare organizations and entities to collaborate with cybersecurity experts and government agencies to stay updated and better defend against sophisticated threat actors like the Lazarus Group.

Explore more

AI Human Resources Integration – Review

The rapid transition of the human resources department from a back-office administrative hub to a high-tech nerve center has fundamentally altered how organizations perceive their most valuable asset: their people. While the promise of efficiency has always been the primary driver of digital adoption, the current landscape reveals a complex interplay between sophisticated algorithms and the indispensable nature of human

Is Your Organization Hiring for Experience or Adaptability?

The standard executive recruitment model has historically prioritized candidates with decades of specialized industry tenure, yet the current economic volatility suggests that a reliance on past success is no longer a reliable predictor of future performance. In 2026, the global marketplace is defined by rapid technological shifts where long-standing industry norms are frequently upended by generative AI and decentralized finance

OpenAI Challenge Hiring – Review

The traditional resume, once the golden ticket to high-stakes employment, has officially entered its obsolescence phase as automated systems and AI-generated content saturate the labor market. In response, OpenAI has introduced a performance-driven recruitment model that bypasses the “slop” of polished but hollow applications. This shift represents a fundamental pivot toward verified capability, where a candidate’s worth is measured not

How Do Your Leadership Signals Affect Team Performance?

The modern corporate landscape operates within a state of constant flux where economic shifts and rapid technological integration create an environment of perpetual high-stakes decision-making. In this atmosphere, the emotional and behavioral cues projected by executives do not merely stay within the confines of the boardroom but ripple through every level of an organization, dictating the collective psychological state of

Restoring Human Choice to Counter Modern Management Crises

Ling-yi Tsai, an organizational strategy expert with decades of experience in HR technology and behavioral science, has dedicated her career to helping global firms navigate the friction between technological efficiency and human potential. In an era where data-driven decision-making is often mistaken for leadership, she argues that we have industrialized the “how” of work while losing sight of the “why.”