A South Korean lawmaker has recently raised concerns about the top crypto exchanges in the country, accusing them of neglecting their responsibilities to protect investors. The lawmaker, a member of the main opposition Democratic Party, directed criticism towards the Digital Asset Exchange Association (DAXA), an organization representing five leading exchanges in South Korea.
Criticism of the Digital Asset Exchange Association (DAXA)
DAXA has suffered a series of blows to its reputation in recent months, largely due to apparent divisions among the exchange’s policies. The lawmaker specifically took aim at DAXA, citing its failure to protect the interests of investors.
Unilateral Delisting of WEMIX Token
One particularly contentious issue the lawmaker highlighted was the unilateral delisting of the WEMIX token. In late 2022, DAXA voted to delist WEMIX, a token launched by a domestic gaming firm called WeMade. However, despite the initial decision, all DAXA members, except for Upbit, have since relisted the token, even though there has been no formal policy change in DAXA regarding the WEMIX delisting. This inconsistency in decision-making has only served to further erode trust in DAXA and the exchanges it represents.
Confusing policies related to Creditcoin (CTC)
The confusion surrounding DAXA’s policies was further exemplified by its handling of the altcoin Creditcoin (CTC). Policies regarding CTC were unclear, leaving investors uncertain about the coin’s status and its validity on the exchanges. This lack of transparency and consistency raises concerns about the overall governance and decision-making process of the association.
Understanding “Kimchi Coins”
In South Korea, the term “kimchi coins” is commonly used to describe low-cap altcoins that enjoy popularity on local exchanges but have limited trading volume elsewhere. These coins often attract speculative investments and are deemed riskier due to lower liquidity levels. It is crucial for exchanges and associations like DAXA to proactively protect investors engaging in such markets, prone to high volatility.
Criticism of DAXA’s laissez-faire attitude
The lawmaker expressed disappointment in DAXA’s laissez-faire attitude towards its own guidelines for coin designation and delisting. While the association has clear guidelines in place, the lawmaker argues that DAXA consistently fails to adhere to them, thereby undermining investor trust and protection.
The need for stricter regulation
The lawmaker concluded that if regulators are genuinely committed to enforcing investor protection, they must step up their efforts. A key development on the horizon is the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, set to come into effect in July of this year. This legislation will place increased responsibilities on exchanges, compelling them to take proactive steps to safeguard their customers from fraud, rug-pulls, and other crypto-related scams.
Requirements under the Virtual Asset User Protection Act
The Virtual Asset User Protection Act will introduce measures to enhance consumer protection in the crypto industry. Exchanges will be mandated to implement stronger security measures and adhere to strict anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) procedures. Additionally, exchanges will be held accountable for any illicit activities occurring on their platforms. These regulations aim to create a safer and more transparent environment for cryptocurrency investors.
The claims made by the South Korean lawmaker regarding the negligence of crypto exchanges in protecting investors serve as a reminder of the significant challenges faced by the industry. The inconsistencies in decision-making, unclear policies, and laissez-faire attitude highlighted within DAXA raise concerns about the level of investor protection provided by the association. As the Virtual Asset User Protection Act comes into play, stricter regulations and proactive steps taken by exchanges will be crucial in ensuring the safety and security of cryptocurrency investors in South Korea.