Samsung Galaxy A36 vs. A35: Detailed Comparison and Buyer Guide

Article Highlights
Off On

When it comes to choosing a midrange smartphone, Samsung has consistently provided competitive options. Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A36 with its predecessor, the A35, offers insights into their enhancements and helps buyers decide which suits their needs best. This analysis seeks to cover design, display features, battery life, performance, camera capabilities, pricing, and general recommendations for prospective users.

Design and Build Quality

Both the Galaxy A36 and A35 share similar dimensions, but the A36 is slightly thinner and lighter. The A36’s design includes a marginally larger 6.7-inch display compared to the A35’s 6.6-inch screen, resulting in a more modern look with thinner bezels. Additionally, the build quality of both smartphone models is robust, featuring a plastic middle frame and Gorilla Glass Victus+ front panels. However, the A36 elevates its durability with a Gorilla Glass Victus+ back, an upgrade from the A35’s standard glass back. This enhancement makes the A36 more resilient when it comes to accidental drops and everyday wear and tear.

Both models boast an IP67 rating, ensuring resistance to dust and water. This rating means they can withstand submersion in up to one meter of water for up to thirty minutes, offering peace of mind for users in various environments. Button layouts and connectivity options between the two models remain standard, featuring under-display optical fingerprint readers and a hybrid stereo speaker setup. Despite the minor advancements in the A36, such as eSIM support and upgraded Bluetooth 5.4 (compared to Bluetooth 5.3 in the A35), the A35 holds an edge with its microSD expandable storage option, which is absent in the A36.

Display Features

Both smartphones feature FullHD+ resolution and a 120Hz refresh rate, providing smooth motion and clear visuals. An essential upgrade in the A36 is its notable improvement in maximum display brightness, which enhances its usability in bright environments, such as outdoors under direct sunlight. This increased brightness makes it easier to view content without straining your eyes. Despite these advancements, both models lack advanced adaptive switching technologies like LTPO, which would have allowed for better power management through variable refresh rates.

HDR video content remains unsupported on both the A36 and A35, maintaining a similar viewing experience regarding color depth and contrast. Although this might be a limitation for users who consume a lot of high-definition streaming content, the overall display performance remains solid for general use, including web browsing, social media, and gaming. The slightly larger screen and improved brightness of the A36 may tip the scale for users who prioritize display quality but otherwise, both devices offer a competitive visual experience.

Battery Efficiency and Charging

Equipped with identical 5,000 mAh batteries, both models offer solid endurance for daily use. This capacity ensures that users can enjoy prolonged periods of activity, such as browsing, streaming, and calling, without constantly worrying about recharging. Interestingly, the A35 stands out in gaming efficiency due to its Exynos 1350 chipset, providing longer gaming durations compared to the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 in the A36. This makes the A35 a better option for avid gamers or users who engage in intensive tasks.

Charging efficiency sees improvement in the A36, which supports 45W PD fast charging compared to the A35’s 25W capability. Though this difference may seem minor on paper, in practice, the A36 charges faster, particularly during the initial stages of charging. This can be crucial for users who need to top up their battery quickly. However, it’s worth noting that neither model includes a charger in the box, and the A36 additionally requires a 5 Amp cable, sold separately, to achieve its peak charging speeds. Prospective buyers should be aware of these additional costs when evaluating their options.

Performance and Software Enhancements

The Galaxy A36 and A35 use different but comparably powerful chipsets, with the A36 featuring a 4nm Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, and the A35 powered by a 5nm Exynos 1380. These technological differences influence the performance of each device, impacting everything from multitasking abilities to overall speed and responsiveness. Storage options are diverse, with the A35 utilizing UFS 2.1 technology for different RAM and storage configurations, while the A36 includes slightly improved UFS 2.2 storage technology and offers up to 12GB RAM. A key advancement for the A36 is the latest One UI 7 on Android 15, which promises six major OS updates. This surpasses the A35’s One UI 6.1 on Android 14, which guarantees four major updates. This extended software support for the A36 significantly augments its future-proofing, providing users with the latest features, security updates, and performance improvements for a longer period. For users who prefer staying updated with the latest software advancements, the A36 offers a clear advantage.

Camera Capabilities

Both the Samsung Galaxy A36 and A35 come equipped with a solid camera array, featuring a 50MP main camera, an 8MP ultrawide lens, and a 5MP macro lens. These configurations allow users to capture a variety of shots, whether it’s wide landscapes, close-up details, or everyday scenes. Interestingly, the A36 delivers sharper and more contrast-focused photos through its improved image processing algorithms, making it a preferred choice for users who appreciate vibrant and detailed pictures. Conversely, the A35’s images appear softer and more natural, which may appeal to those who prioritize realistic color reproduction.

The front camera sees a minor adjustment, with the A35 sporting a 13MP selfie camera, which outperforms the A36’s new 12MP front camera in terms of clarity and skin tone accuracy under proper lighting conditions. Despite this difference, both models perform adequately for video calls, social media selfies, and personal portraits. Additionally, low-light photography shows marginal improvements in the A36, but these aren’t substantial enough to declare a clear winner. In terms of video capability, both models can record in 4K using the main camera, delivering comparable quality outcomes in their ultrawide and zoom shots.

Market Prices and Availability

One of the critical factors potential buyers may consider is the market-specific pricing and availability of each model. In markets such as the US and EU, the Galaxy A36’s price aligns closely with that of the A35, making the A36 the preferable option due to its enhanced features and future-proofing capabilities. This parity in pricing allows users to opt for the A36 without a significant financial leap, thus benefiting from the incremental upgrades it offers.

Conversely, in the UK market, there is a notable price disparity. The A36 is available only in a higher 256GB storage capacity and is priced approximately £150 higher than the A35’s 128GB variant. For budget-conscious consumers, this substantial price difference makes the A35 a more attractive option, especially considering that the overall user experience remains largely consistent between the two models. These pricing and availability factors are crucial considerations for buyers looking to get the best value for their money.

General Consensus and Buyer Recommendations

When considering a midrange smartphone, Samsung consistently offers competitive choices. A comparison between the Samsung Galaxy A36 and its predecessor, the A35, provides valuable insights into their improvements and helps buyers decide which model fits their needs best. This analysis will delve into several key areas including design, display features, battery life, performance, camera capabilities, pricing, and overall recommendations for potential users. The Samsung Galaxy A36 showcases a sleek, modern design with subtle refinements over the A35. Its display capabilities have also seen improvements, offering a clearer, more vibrant visual experience. Battery life is always a critical factor, and the A36 aims to deliver longer usage times, which is a significant improvement over the A35.

Performance-wise, the A36, equipped with a newer processor, promises smoother multitasking and better gaming experiences. Camera capabilities are another area where Samsung has made strides; the A36’s camera system introduces enhanced features and better image quality compared to the A35.

Pricing between the two models is competitive, making the decision more about specific needs and preferences rather than budget constraints. Ultimately, this comparison provides a comprehensive overview of how the Samsung Galaxy A36 stacks up against the A35, guiding prospective buyers to make an informed choice based on their priorities and requirements.

Explore more

What If Data Engineers Stopped Fighting Fires?

The global push toward artificial intelligence has placed an unprecedented demand on the architects of modern data infrastructure, yet a silent crisis of inefficiency often traps these crucial experts in a relentless cycle of reactive problem-solving. Data engineers, the individuals tasked with building and maintaining the digital pipelines that fuel every major business initiative, are increasingly bogged down by the

What Is Shaping the Future of Data Engineering?

Beyond the Pipeline: Data Engineering’s Strategic Evolution Data engineering has quietly evolved from a back-office function focused on building simple data pipelines into the strategic backbone of the modern enterprise. Once defined by Extract, Transform, Load (ETL) jobs that moved data into rigid warehouses, the field is now at the epicenter of innovation, powering everything from real-time analytics and AI-driven

Trend Analysis: Agentic AI Infrastructure

From dazzling demonstrations of autonomous task completion to the ambitious roadmaps of enterprise software, Agentic AI promises a fundamental revolution in how humans interact with technology. This wave of innovation, however, is revealing a critical vulnerability hidden beneath the surface of sophisticated models and clever prompt design: the data infrastructure that powers these autonomous systems. An emerging trend is now

Embedded Finance and BaaS – Review

The checkout button on a favorite shopping app and the instant payment to a gig worker are no longer simple transactions; they are the visible endpoints of a profound architectural shift remaking the financial industry from the inside out. The rise of Embedded Finance and Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) represents a significant advancement in the financial services sector. This review will explore

Trend Analysis: Embedded Finance

Financial services are quietly dissolving into the digital fabric of everyday life, becoming an invisible yet essential component of non-financial applications from ride-sharing platforms to retail loyalty programs. This integration represents far more than a simple convenience; it is a fundamental re-architecting of the financial industry. At its core, this shift is transforming bank balance sheets from static pools of