National Bank of Ukraine Stresses Crypto “Not Money,” Plans for Regulation Aligned with EU Framework

In a recent announcement, the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) has emphatically stated that cryptocurrencies are not to be considered as money. Additionally, the NBU has reasserted its commitment to regulating the rapidly evolving crypto sector, using EU law as a benchmark. This move highlights the NBU’s progressive approach toward cryptocurrencies and its determination to establish a robust regulatory framework that will protect investors and foster innovation.

Agreement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF)

The NBU’s stance on cryptocurrencies aligns with the perspective of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). In a show of solidarity, the NBU concurs with the IMF’s characterization of cryptoassets as “not money.” This shared view underscores the importance of adopting a cautious approach toward the ever-expanding crypto market.

NBU’s Commitment to Regulate the Crypto Sector

Kateryna Rozhkova, the First Deputy Governor of the NBU, emphasized the institution’s unwavering commitment to regulating the crypto sector during a recent TV interview with My-Ukraina. Asserting that cryptocurrencies are not money, Rozhkova highlighted the NBU’s plan to implement comprehensive regulatory measures.

Rozhkova further elaborated on the NBU’s regulatory plans, indicating that they intend to reference EU law for guidance. By leveraging the experience and expertise of the European Union, the NBU aims to create a regulatory framework that aligns with international best practices and navigates any potential challenges associated with the crypto sector.

Potential delay in regulatory measures

While the NBU is resolute in its intention to regulate the crypto sector, Rozhkova candidly admitted that the matter might take a back seat for the time being. Speculation arises as to the reasons behind this delay. Some experts believe that the NBU may be cautiously monitoring the global regulatory landscape to ensure a well-informed and comprehensive approach. Others suggest that the delayed timeframe could be attributed to the complex nature of developing a tailored regulatory framework that effectively addresses the unique attributes of cryptocurrencies.

Lawmakers’ perspectives

Lawmakers in Ukraine seem to have differing views on the regulation of the crypto sector. While the NBU prioritizes the implementation of crypto regulations, other lawmakers have distinct plans for the industry. The Verkhovna Rada’s Committee on Finance, Tax, and Customs Policy, for instance, has revealed that they are currently working on a draft crypto tax bill.

This divergence in perspectives might pose some challenges in achieving a harmonized and comprehensive regulatory framework. However, it is imperative for stakeholders to engage in fruitful discussions to reconcile their differing opinions and find common ground that can propel the industry forward.

The NBU’s firm stance on cryptocurrencies, not considering them as money, reflects its concerted efforts to establish a structured and regulated crypto sector. The alignment of the NBU’s perspective with that of the IMF further underscores the importance of prudently navigating the complexities of the crypto landscape.

Despite potential delays in regulatory measures, the NBU remains committed to creating a robust framework that balances innovation, investor protection, and systemic stability. By utilizing EU law as a reference, the NBU aims to draw upon international best practices to shape its regulatory framework.

In this era of digital transformation, it is crucial for Ukraine to establish a regulatory environment that fosters responsible growth and safeguards against potential risks. With stakeholders working together, Ukraine has the opportunity to become a leading jurisdiction that fosters innovation while ensuring the protection of investors and the stability of its financial system. By coupling the NBU’s proactive approach with constructive dialogue among lawmakers, Ukraine can pave the way for a thriving and sustainable crypto ecosystem.

Explore more

Why Corporate Wellness Programs Fail to Fix Workplace Stress

The modern professional often finds that for every dollar spent on a meditation app by their employer, nearly one hundred and fifty dollars are drained from the global economy due to systemic burnout and disengagement. This economic disparity highlights a growing tension between the wellness industry, which has grown into a juggernaut worth sixty billion dollars, and the eight point

How to Fix the Workplace Communication and Feedback Crisis

The silent erosion of professional morale often begins not with a grand failure of strategy but with the subtle, persistent friction caused by poorly articulated managerial guidance. This disconnect between managerial intent and employee performance represents a significant hurdle for modern organizations, as traditional critique methods frequently lead to burnout rather than improvement. Addressing the central challenge of workplace communication

How Can You Close the Feedback Gap to Retain Top Talent?

When elite professionals choose to resign, the departure frequently stems from a prolonged absence of meaningful dialogue regarding their trajectory within the organization and the specific expectations surrounding their professional contributions. This silence creates a vacuum where uncertainty flourishes, eventually pushing high achievers toward the exit. Research indicates that nearly half of all employees who voluntarily leave their roles cite

Can AI Infrastructure Redefine Wealth Management?

The once-revolutionary promise of digital wealth management has hit a ceiling where simply layering more software atop crumbling legacy systems no longer yields a competitive edge for modern firms. This realization has sparked a fundamental shift in how the industry approaches technology. Instead of pursuing cosmetic updates, firms are now looking at the very bones of their operations to find

Family Office Models Reshape Korean Wealth Management

The skyline of Seoul no longer just represents industrial might but also signals a historic accumulation of private capital that is forcing the nation’s most prestigious financial institutions to rewrite their playbooks entirely. The traditional private banking model, once centered on the 1-billion-won investor, is undergoing a radical metamorphosis. As of 2026, a burgeoning class of ultra-wealthy households has redefined