National Bank of Ukraine Stresses Crypto “Not Money,” Plans for Regulation Aligned with EU Framework

In a recent announcement, the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) has emphatically stated that cryptocurrencies are not to be considered as money. Additionally, the NBU has reasserted its commitment to regulating the rapidly evolving crypto sector, using EU law as a benchmark. This move highlights the NBU’s progressive approach toward cryptocurrencies and its determination to establish a robust regulatory framework that will protect investors and foster innovation.

Agreement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF)

The NBU’s stance on cryptocurrencies aligns with the perspective of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). In a show of solidarity, the NBU concurs with the IMF’s characterization of cryptoassets as “not money.” This shared view underscores the importance of adopting a cautious approach toward the ever-expanding crypto market.

NBU’s Commitment to Regulate the Crypto Sector

Kateryna Rozhkova, the First Deputy Governor of the NBU, emphasized the institution’s unwavering commitment to regulating the crypto sector during a recent TV interview with My-Ukraina. Asserting that cryptocurrencies are not money, Rozhkova highlighted the NBU’s plan to implement comprehensive regulatory measures.

Rozhkova further elaborated on the NBU’s regulatory plans, indicating that they intend to reference EU law for guidance. By leveraging the experience and expertise of the European Union, the NBU aims to create a regulatory framework that aligns with international best practices and navigates any potential challenges associated with the crypto sector.

Potential delay in regulatory measures

While the NBU is resolute in its intention to regulate the crypto sector, Rozhkova candidly admitted that the matter might take a back seat for the time being. Speculation arises as to the reasons behind this delay. Some experts believe that the NBU may be cautiously monitoring the global regulatory landscape to ensure a well-informed and comprehensive approach. Others suggest that the delayed timeframe could be attributed to the complex nature of developing a tailored regulatory framework that effectively addresses the unique attributes of cryptocurrencies.

Lawmakers’ perspectives

Lawmakers in Ukraine seem to have differing views on the regulation of the crypto sector. While the NBU prioritizes the implementation of crypto regulations, other lawmakers have distinct plans for the industry. The Verkhovna Rada’s Committee on Finance, Tax, and Customs Policy, for instance, has revealed that they are currently working on a draft crypto tax bill.

This divergence in perspectives might pose some challenges in achieving a harmonized and comprehensive regulatory framework. However, it is imperative for stakeholders to engage in fruitful discussions to reconcile their differing opinions and find common ground that can propel the industry forward.

The NBU’s firm stance on cryptocurrencies, not considering them as money, reflects its concerted efforts to establish a structured and regulated crypto sector. The alignment of the NBU’s perspective with that of the IMF further underscores the importance of prudently navigating the complexities of the crypto landscape.

Despite potential delays in regulatory measures, the NBU remains committed to creating a robust framework that balances innovation, investor protection, and systemic stability. By utilizing EU law as a reference, the NBU aims to draw upon international best practices to shape its regulatory framework.

In this era of digital transformation, it is crucial for Ukraine to establish a regulatory environment that fosters responsible growth and safeguards against potential risks. With stakeholders working together, Ukraine has the opportunity to become a leading jurisdiction that fosters innovation while ensuring the protection of investors and the stability of its financial system. By coupling the NBU’s proactive approach with constructive dialogue among lawmakers, Ukraine can pave the way for a thriving and sustainable crypto ecosystem.

Explore more

Silicon Network Shutdown Leaves $10 Million at Risk

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin’s observations on layer-2 survival are mirrored in the current collapse of specialized networks like the Silicon infrastructure. The sudden cessation of services for a niche blockchain often leaves a trail of frozen assets and bewildered users who believed in the permanence of decentralized systems. Silicon Network, once marketed as a high-performance solution for specific decentralized finance

Will Banks Control the Future of Blockchain Settlement?

Financial institutions are moving beyond exploratory groups to establish a foothold in the digital asset space before decentralized alternatives become too entrenched to displace. This strategic shift is visible in the formation of a powerhouse consortium consisting of twenty-one global banking leaders, including giants such as Goldman Sachs and UBS, who are now developing a unified stablecoin ecosystem. For several

How Does Fire Ant Compromise Enterprise Network Infrastructure?

Malicious actors utilize virtualization-adjacent shell channels such as VMCI and VSOCK to bridge the gap between physical hardware and virtual environments. This sophisticated methodology represents a departure from the traditional focus on end-user devices, signaling a new era in which the core infrastructure of an organization is the primary target for exploitation. In the current landscape of 2026, the group

Second Circuit Rejects NLRB Tesla Rule on Workplace Dress Codes

The Second Circuit specifically upheld a policy limiting employees to wearing only one non-company-approved pin while on the clock at a high-end retail location. This pivotal decision in Siren Retail Corporation v. NLRB, handed down on September 2, 2026, represents a fundamental restructuring of how federal courts view workplace appearance standards in the modern labor landscape. For years, employers struggled

Experience Branding Becomes the New Marketing Frontier

A significant gap between a company’s sustainability promises and its actual packaging choices creates a cognitive dissonance that destroys brand equity faster than any competitor. In the current market environment of 2026, the traditional methods of shouting for attention through disruptive advertising have largely lost their efficacy as consumers pivot toward tangible experiences. Modern branding has evolved into a discipline