National Bank of Ukraine Stresses Crypto “Not Money,” Plans for Regulation Aligned with EU Framework

In a recent announcement, the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) has emphatically stated that cryptocurrencies are not to be considered as money. Additionally, the NBU has reasserted its commitment to regulating the rapidly evolving crypto sector, using EU law as a benchmark. This move highlights the NBU’s progressive approach toward cryptocurrencies and its determination to establish a robust regulatory framework that will protect investors and foster innovation.

Agreement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF)

The NBU’s stance on cryptocurrencies aligns with the perspective of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). In a show of solidarity, the NBU concurs with the IMF’s characterization of cryptoassets as “not money.” This shared view underscores the importance of adopting a cautious approach toward the ever-expanding crypto market.

NBU’s Commitment to Regulate the Crypto Sector

Kateryna Rozhkova, the First Deputy Governor of the NBU, emphasized the institution’s unwavering commitment to regulating the crypto sector during a recent TV interview with My-Ukraina. Asserting that cryptocurrencies are not money, Rozhkova highlighted the NBU’s plan to implement comprehensive regulatory measures.

Rozhkova further elaborated on the NBU’s regulatory plans, indicating that they intend to reference EU law for guidance. By leveraging the experience and expertise of the European Union, the NBU aims to create a regulatory framework that aligns with international best practices and navigates any potential challenges associated with the crypto sector.

Potential delay in regulatory measures

While the NBU is resolute in its intention to regulate the crypto sector, Rozhkova candidly admitted that the matter might take a back seat for the time being. Speculation arises as to the reasons behind this delay. Some experts believe that the NBU may be cautiously monitoring the global regulatory landscape to ensure a well-informed and comprehensive approach. Others suggest that the delayed timeframe could be attributed to the complex nature of developing a tailored regulatory framework that effectively addresses the unique attributes of cryptocurrencies.

Lawmakers’ perspectives

Lawmakers in Ukraine seem to have differing views on the regulation of the crypto sector. While the NBU prioritizes the implementation of crypto regulations, other lawmakers have distinct plans for the industry. The Verkhovna Rada’s Committee on Finance, Tax, and Customs Policy, for instance, has revealed that they are currently working on a draft crypto tax bill.

This divergence in perspectives might pose some challenges in achieving a harmonized and comprehensive regulatory framework. However, it is imperative for stakeholders to engage in fruitful discussions to reconcile their differing opinions and find common ground that can propel the industry forward.

The NBU’s firm stance on cryptocurrencies, not considering them as money, reflects its concerted efforts to establish a structured and regulated crypto sector. The alignment of the NBU’s perspective with that of the IMF further underscores the importance of prudently navigating the complexities of the crypto landscape.

Despite potential delays in regulatory measures, the NBU remains committed to creating a robust framework that balances innovation, investor protection, and systemic stability. By utilizing EU law as a reference, the NBU aims to draw upon international best practices to shape its regulatory framework.

In this era of digital transformation, it is crucial for Ukraine to establish a regulatory environment that fosters responsible growth and safeguards against potential risks. With stakeholders working together, Ukraine has the opportunity to become a leading jurisdiction that fosters innovation while ensuring the protection of investors and the stability of its financial system. By coupling the NBU’s proactive approach with constructive dialogue among lawmakers, Ukraine can pave the way for a thriving and sustainable crypto ecosystem.

Explore more

Enable Virtualization to Unlock Better PC Performance

Activating VT-x or AMD-V in the BIOS menu serves as a critical first step for users seeking to run multiple isolated operating systems on a single physical machine without compromising hardware speed. This fundamental configuration, often hidden within the complex layers of a computer’s firmware, represents the gateway to a more flexible computing experience that moves beyond the limitations of

How Can Virtualization Transform Your ATM Testing Lab?

Scaling testing capacity no longer requires purchasing additional physical machines because virtualized ATM instances can be cloned on demand to provide every tester with a private environment. In the current landscape of 2026, financial institutions must prioritize rapid innovation to keep pace with changing consumer habits and emerging payment technologies. Traditional testing methodologies, which rely heavily on physical hardware availability

Is a PCIe Card Better Than Onboard Motherboard Wi-Fi?

A discrete networking card serves as a critical redundancy for power users, offering a permanent-quality connection that rivals wired speeds when Ethernet infrastructure is unavailable. The choice between an all-in-one motherboard solution and a dedicated expansion card is not merely a matter of convenience; it is a strategic decision that affects the thermal envelope, the signal integrity, and the financial

How Can Banks Balance Cloud and On-Premises Security?

The intersection of physical safety and IT architecture requires a sophisticated approach to data ownership that traditional security installers often fail to consider. For contemporary financial institutions, the days of standalone analog cameras and isolated alarm panels have been replaced by a complex ecosystem of networked devices. This shift necessitates a rethink of how credit unions and banks manage their

Russia Shifts Strategy to Target Ukraine’s Data Centers

Military analysts at the Institute for the Study of War suggest that Russia is now seeking alternative mechanisms for victory through the degradation of the Ukrainian economy. As conventional front-line offensive operations have largely failed to achieve their stated 2026 objectives, the Kremlin has recalibrated its focus toward the nation’s digital backbone. Since mid-September, a systematic campaign has emerged, prioritizing