National Bank of Ukraine Stresses Crypto “Not Money,” Plans for Regulation Aligned with EU Framework

In a recent announcement, the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) has emphatically stated that cryptocurrencies are not to be considered as money. Additionally, the NBU has reasserted its commitment to regulating the rapidly evolving crypto sector, using EU law as a benchmark. This move highlights the NBU’s progressive approach toward cryptocurrencies and its determination to establish a robust regulatory framework that will protect investors and foster innovation.

Agreement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF)

The NBU’s stance on cryptocurrencies aligns with the perspective of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). In a show of solidarity, the NBU concurs with the IMF’s characterization of cryptoassets as “not money.” This shared view underscores the importance of adopting a cautious approach toward the ever-expanding crypto market.

NBU’s Commitment to Regulate the Crypto Sector

Kateryna Rozhkova, the First Deputy Governor of the NBU, emphasized the institution’s unwavering commitment to regulating the crypto sector during a recent TV interview with My-Ukraina. Asserting that cryptocurrencies are not money, Rozhkova highlighted the NBU’s plan to implement comprehensive regulatory measures.

Rozhkova further elaborated on the NBU’s regulatory plans, indicating that they intend to reference EU law for guidance. By leveraging the experience and expertise of the European Union, the NBU aims to create a regulatory framework that aligns with international best practices and navigates any potential challenges associated with the crypto sector.

Potential delay in regulatory measures

While the NBU is resolute in its intention to regulate the crypto sector, Rozhkova candidly admitted that the matter might take a back seat for the time being. Speculation arises as to the reasons behind this delay. Some experts believe that the NBU may be cautiously monitoring the global regulatory landscape to ensure a well-informed and comprehensive approach. Others suggest that the delayed timeframe could be attributed to the complex nature of developing a tailored regulatory framework that effectively addresses the unique attributes of cryptocurrencies.

Lawmakers’ perspectives

Lawmakers in Ukraine seem to have differing views on the regulation of the crypto sector. While the NBU prioritizes the implementation of crypto regulations, other lawmakers have distinct plans for the industry. The Verkhovna Rada’s Committee on Finance, Tax, and Customs Policy, for instance, has revealed that they are currently working on a draft crypto tax bill.

This divergence in perspectives might pose some challenges in achieving a harmonized and comprehensive regulatory framework. However, it is imperative for stakeholders to engage in fruitful discussions to reconcile their differing opinions and find common ground that can propel the industry forward.

The NBU’s firm stance on cryptocurrencies, not considering them as money, reflects its concerted efforts to establish a structured and regulated crypto sector. The alignment of the NBU’s perspective with that of the IMF further underscores the importance of prudently navigating the complexities of the crypto landscape.

Despite potential delays in regulatory measures, the NBU remains committed to creating a robust framework that balances innovation, investor protection, and systemic stability. By utilizing EU law as a reference, the NBU aims to draw upon international best practices to shape its regulatory framework.

In this era of digital transformation, it is crucial for Ukraine to establish a regulatory environment that fosters responsible growth and safeguards against potential risks. With stakeholders working together, Ukraine has the opportunity to become a leading jurisdiction that fosters innovation while ensuring the protection of investors and the stability of its financial system. By coupling the NBU’s proactive approach with constructive dialogue among lawmakers, Ukraine can pave the way for a thriving and sustainable crypto ecosystem.

Explore more

Is ChatGPT the Future of Hotel and Travel Advertising?

The transition from scanning data to seeking synthesized advice represents a permanent change in how tourism destinations and luxury resorts must approach digital visibility. As the travel industry reaches a critical juncture in 2026, the reliance on static search results has dwindled in favor of interactive, intelligent dialogue. Syndacast, a prominent agency in the Asia-Pacific region, has recognized this evolution

Can Tokenized Deposits Transform Canada’s Financial Future?

Regulated institutional trust is being combined with blockchain automation to create a foundation for a twenty-four-seven tokenized economy in Canada. This transition represents a significant departure from the traditional financial architecture that has governed the nation for decades. Historically, Canadian commercial bank deposits existed as static entries within private, siloed ledgers, requiring complex reconciliation processes and limited by the operational

How Is CyphaLab Bridging the Gap Between TradFi and DeFi?

The movement of assets between traditional brokerage systems and decentralized liquidity venues is streamlined through a specialized transaction orchestration layer. In the current economic climate of 2026, the global financial industry is witnessing a pivotal shift as blockchain technology moves beyond its experimental roots to become a core foundation of asset management. CyphaLab has emerged as a major driver of

Why Did Sequans Abandon Its Bitcoin Treasury Strategy?

The official termination of the Bitcoin treasury strategy on September 24, 2026, allowed the firm to redirect all resources toward its expanding 4G and 5G cellular solutions. This strategic pivot marked the end of a high-stakes financial journey for Sequans Communications, which had initially sought to redefine the role of digital assets within the semiconductor industry. Throughout the previous fifteen

Will AI Data Centers Define the Future of Hamilton?

The defeat of the proposed development moratorium was influenced by concerns that a blanket ban might exceed the city’s legal jurisdiction and lead to litigation. This legislative turning point has placed Hamilton at a pivotal crossroads where the burgeoning global industry of artificial intelligence (AI) intersects directly with local environmental stewardship and complex urban planning strategies. As the municipal election