National Bank of Ukraine Stresses Crypto “Not Money,” Plans for Regulation Aligned with EU Framework

In a recent announcement, the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) has emphatically stated that cryptocurrencies are not to be considered as money. Additionally, the NBU has reasserted its commitment to regulating the rapidly evolving crypto sector, using EU law as a benchmark. This move highlights the NBU’s progressive approach toward cryptocurrencies and its determination to establish a robust regulatory framework that will protect investors and foster innovation.

Agreement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF)

The NBU’s stance on cryptocurrencies aligns with the perspective of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). In a show of solidarity, the NBU concurs with the IMF’s characterization of cryptoassets as “not money.” This shared view underscores the importance of adopting a cautious approach toward the ever-expanding crypto market.

NBU’s Commitment to Regulate the Crypto Sector

Kateryna Rozhkova, the First Deputy Governor of the NBU, emphasized the institution’s unwavering commitment to regulating the crypto sector during a recent TV interview with My-Ukraina. Asserting that cryptocurrencies are not money, Rozhkova highlighted the NBU’s plan to implement comprehensive regulatory measures.

Rozhkova further elaborated on the NBU’s regulatory plans, indicating that they intend to reference EU law for guidance. By leveraging the experience and expertise of the European Union, the NBU aims to create a regulatory framework that aligns with international best practices and navigates any potential challenges associated with the crypto sector.

Potential delay in regulatory measures

While the NBU is resolute in its intention to regulate the crypto sector, Rozhkova candidly admitted that the matter might take a back seat for the time being. Speculation arises as to the reasons behind this delay. Some experts believe that the NBU may be cautiously monitoring the global regulatory landscape to ensure a well-informed and comprehensive approach. Others suggest that the delayed timeframe could be attributed to the complex nature of developing a tailored regulatory framework that effectively addresses the unique attributes of cryptocurrencies.

Lawmakers’ perspectives

Lawmakers in Ukraine seem to have differing views on the regulation of the crypto sector. While the NBU prioritizes the implementation of crypto regulations, other lawmakers have distinct plans for the industry. The Verkhovna Rada’s Committee on Finance, Tax, and Customs Policy, for instance, has revealed that they are currently working on a draft crypto tax bill.

This divergence in perspectives might pose some challenges in achieving a harmonized and comprehensive regulatory framework. However, it is imperative for stakeholders to engage in fruitful discussions to reconcile their differing opinions and find common ground that can propel the industry forward.

The NBU’s firm stance on cryptocurrencies, not considering them as money, reflects its concerted efforts to establish a structured and regulated crypto sector. The alignment of the NBU’s perspective with that of the IMF further underscores the importance of prudently navigating the complexities of the crypto landscape.

Despite potential delays in regulatory measures, the NBU remains committed to creating a robust framework that balances innovation, investor protection, and systemic stability. By utilizing EU law as a reference, the NBU aims to draw upon international best practices to shape its regulatory framework.

In this era of digital transformation, it is crucial for Ukraine to establish a regulatory environment that fosters responsible growth and safeguards against potential risks. With stakeholders working together, Ukraine has the opportunity to become a leading jurisdiction that fosters innovation while ensuring the protection of investors and the stability of its financial system. By coupling the NBU’s proactive approach with constructive dialogue among lawmakers, Ukraine can pave the way for a thriving and sustainable crypto ecosystem.

Explore more

How Will the New UPI MDR Impact Digital Payments?

Government officials have designed the 0.4 percent rate to ensure that the vast majority of grassroots economic activity remains unaffected by digital payment costs. This strategic move represents a maturation of the Indian digital payments ecosystem, which has long relied on government subsidies to maintain its celebrated zero-fee structure. As the volume of transactions reaches unprecedented levels, the need for

OLRB Clarifies Workplace Harassment Investigation Standards

Employers who fail to interview relevant witnesses identified in an initial complaint may find their entire harassment investigation invalidated by regulatory bodies for a lack of procedural thoroughness. This warning stems from a pivotal ruling by the Ontario Labour Relations Board, which recently clarified the murky legal requirements surrounding workplace harassment inquiries. Under the Occupational Health and Safety Act, employers

What Are the Best All-in-One Accounting Platforms for SMBs?

In the highly competitive landscape of 2026, financial agility has transformed from a competitive advantage into a fundamental requirement for small and medium-sized businesses. Many organizations continue to struggle with fragmented legacy systems, employing a disparate array of applications for billing, bank reconciliation, and inventory tracking. This disconnected approach, frequently described as a Frankenstein’s monster software configuration, inevitably leads to

How Do We Secure the Modern SaaS Attack Surface?

Transitioning to an integrated governance model is essential for preventing security gaps that naturally occur between siloed detection and recovery systems in the cloud. The shift from on-premise infrastructure to these expansive cloud-centric models has fundamentally dissolved the traditional security perimeter that once defined corporate safety. As organizations now manage an average of 100 different software-as-a-service applications, the obsolete walled

NLRB Memo Signals Shift Toward Employer-Friendly Policies

A proposed return to traditional back-pay models would eliminate the Biden-era expansion of consequential damages for foreseeable financial harms in labor disputes. This directive, central to Memorandum GC 26-04 issued on August 26, 2026, by National Labor Relations Board General Counsel Crystal S. Carey, marks a profound pivot in the federal government’s approach to workplace regulation. As the American labor