Microsoft Buys Land for a Data Center on the Former Foxconn Site in Mount Pleasant

The village board of Mount Pleasant made a decision last week to allow Microsoft to build a data center on land that was originally cleared for the Foxconn LCD fabrication plant that never materialized.

Microsoft’s purchase of the land

The tech giant will acquire the land for $50 million, some of which will be used to reimburse Foxconn for relinquishing its rights to the property. Microsoft made the purchase of the land to expand its growing Azure data center network, which has already proven to be a successful venture for the company.

Construction of the data center

Microsoft aims to construct a $1 billion data center on a 315-acre parcel of land previously assigned to Foxconn, with construction starting no later than 2026. This decision is expected to generate income for the village, which has been struggling with debt after Foxconn pulled out of the previous project.

Impact on the village’s debt

The village had to take on significant debt to prepare the site for Foxconn’s once-anticipated LCD fabrication factory. However, the upcoming establishment of Microsoft’s data center on that land is expected to help pay down that debt, as the technology company seeks to expand its cloud computing services. The project will improve the village’s balance sheet and promote economic growth.

Tax credits for Microsoft

In addition to the new job opportunities that will come from constructing the data center, Microsoft will be eligible for $5 million in tax credits per year based on the improvements made to the land. The tax credits will be provided by the state, meaning that Microsoft’s construction of the data center will ultimately benefit the village, the state of Wisconsin, and the wider US economy.

The village board took Microsoft’s arrival as a sign of vindication for the Foxconn deal. “Microsoft was attracted to this location because it is primed for development,” said Village President David DeGroot in an email statement. This optimistic outlook suggests that the village will work to forge more agreements similar to this in the future.

Revised plans for Foxconn

The revised plans for Foxconn, which aim to create at least 1,454 jobs rather than the initial 13,000, mean that Foxconn’s credits have been reduced to $80 million from the state’s initial offer of $3 billion. Foxconn has already qualified for almost $40 million of those credits and had employed 768 people at the end of 2020, removing concerns about their potential departure causing additional damage to the local economy.

Millions of dollars in credits have been obtained so far by Foxconn, and it has also employed almost 1,000 people – an impressive feat considering the setbacks from the previous proposal.

Costs to the Village

The village’s effort to bulldoze homes in order to clear land for the project has been costly. They have also paid $167 million to a variety of contractors and vendors, including Claude Lois, a politically connected consultant overseeing the project for $28,000 per month. However, this cost is expected to be balanced out by the profits the village will earn from the new deal made with Microsoft.

The decision to have Microsoft construct a data center on land formerly allotted to Foxconn is a source of pride and optimism for the village of Mount Pleasant, located in Wisconsin. Microsoft’s decision to locate its data center on this land presents numerous advantages for the village, including an opportunity to boost the local economy and repay debt accrued from the Foxconn project. The reassessment of Foxconn’s deals, while initially worrying, shows that the state and village have implemented measures to protect themselves in case things go wrong. Overall, this decision will have a positive effect on the village, the state, and the tech industry.

Explore more

D365 Supply Chain Tackles Key Operational Challenges

Imagine a mid-sized manufacturer struggling to keep up with fluctuating demand, facing constant stockouts, and losing customer trust due to delayed deliveries, a scenario all too common in today’s volatile supply chain environment. Rising costs, fragmented data, and unexpected disruptions threaten operational stability, making it essential for businesses, especially small and medium-sized enterprises (SMBs) and manufacturers, to find ways to

Cloud ERP vs. On-Premise ERP: A Comparative Analysis

Imagine a business at a critical juncture, where every decision about technology could make or break its ability to compete in a fast-paced market, and for many organizations, selecting the right Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system becomes that pivotal choice—a decision that impacts efficiency, scalability, and profitability. This comparison delves into two primary deployment models for ERP systems: Cloud ERP

Selecting the Best Shipping Solution for D365SCM Users

Imagine a bustling warehouse where every minute counts, and a single shipping delay ripples through the entire supply chain, frustrating customers and costing thousands in lost revenue. For businesses using Microsoft Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management (D365SCM), this scenario is all too real when the wrong shipping solution disrupts operations. Choosing the right tool to integrate with this powerful platform

How Is AI Reshaping the Future of Content Marketing?

Dive into the future of content marketing with Aisha Amaira, a MarTech expert whose passion for blending technology with marketing has made her a go-to voice in the industry. With deep expertise in CRM marketing technology and customer data platforms, Aisha has a unique perspective on how businesses can harness innovation to uncover critical customer insights. In this interview, we

Why Are Older Job Seekers Facing Record Ageism Complaints?

In an era where workforce diversity is often championed as a cornerstone of innovation, a troubling trend has emerged that threatens to undermine these ideals, particularly for those over 50 seeking employment. Recent data reveals a staggering surge in complaints about ageism, painting a stark picture of systemic bias in hiring practices across the U.S. This issue not only affects