Lazarus Group Exploits Zoho ManageEngine Vulnerability to Target Internet Backbone Infrastructure Provider

The Lazarus Group, a North Korea-linked advanced persistent threat (APT) actor known for its sophisticated cyber attacks, has recently been observed exploiting a vulnerability in Zoho ManageEngine. This exploit led to the compromise of an internet backbone infrastructure provider in Europe. In this article, we will delve into the details of the attack, the timeline, Lazarus Group’s exploitation of the vulnerability, and the implications it holds for organizations around the world.

The attack and timeline

The attack took place in early 2023, just days after proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit code targeting the Zoho ManageEngine flaw was made public. This discovery highlights the inherent risks associated with the release of PoC code. Cybercriminals, like the Lazarus Group, quickly seize the opportunity to leverage such exploits to their advantage, leaving organizations vulnerable to attacks.

Lazarus’ exploitation of CVE-2022-47966

The Lazarus Group utilized the CVE-2022-47966 vulnerability to deploy a new variant of a remote access trojan (RAT) named QuiteRAT. It is essential to note that the successful exploitation of this vulnerability demonstrates the group’s advanced technical capabilities and their ability to adapt their tactics to exploit newly discovered vulnerabilities.

Functionality and Persistence of QuiteRAT

Once executed on a compromised machine, QuiteRAT has the capability to harvest system information, which it then sends to the attackers’ server. Furthermore, QuiteRAT allows the attackers to engage in further system reconnaissance and achieve persistence by modifying the Windows registry. These features grant them prolonged access to the compromised system, enabling them to extract sensitive information and potentially launch further attacks.

Similarities between QuriteRAT and MagicRAT

QuiteRAT, which has been observed in recent Lazarus Group attacks, is notably smaller in size compared to its predecessor, MagicRAT. Additionally, QuiteRAT lacks a built-in persistence mechanism. Both implants employ Base64 encoding to obfuscate their strings and showcase similar functionality aimed at remaining dormant on the endpoint, making detection and analysis more challenging.

Lazarus’ transition to QuiteRAT

Lazarus Group’s decision to replace MagicRAT with QuiteRAT in their recent attacks raises questions about their motives and the strategic shift in their toolset. The move may indicate evolving tactics or an attempt to exploit new vulnerabilities undetected. Understanding this transition is crucial for organizations to anticipate future attacks and take proactive measures to secure their networks.

Lazarus’s targeting of other entities

The attack on the internet backbone infrastructure provider is not an isolated incident. The Lazarus Group has also been targeting healthcare entities in Europe and the US, emphasizing the far-reaching impact and significance of their operations. These attacks highlight the group’s intent to access critical systems and potentially compromise sensitive data, posing a severe threat to the targeted organizations and their stakeholders.

In response to these attacks, Zoho has released patches to address the ManageEngine vulnerability (CVE-2022-47966) for the impacted products. However, this incident serves as a significant reminder of the constant need for vigilance and the importance of promptly implementing security updates and patches. Organizations must remain proactive in assessing their systems’ vulnerabilities, staying informed about emerging threats, and fostering a robust cybersecurity posture to safeguard their networks and sensitive information from the persistent threat posed by groups like Lazarus.

Explore more

Is Your Brand Just Automating or Truly Orchestrating?

Digital communication platforms currently possess the power to reach billions in milliseconds, yet this technological prowess often results in brands shouting through digital megaphones while customers desperately seek a single moment of genuine relevance. The modern consumer landscape is no longer satisfied with generic interactions that merely use a first name in an email subject line. Instead, there is a

What Is the New Math of E-Commerce Parcel Economics?

A standard procurement negotiation once focused on the simple lever of volume-based discounts to ensure profitability, but the modern landscape of e-commerce has rendered that linear equation dangerously incomplete. As of 2026, the retail sector is witnessing a profound shift where the traditional metrics of success—negotiated carrier rates and total package counts—no longer tell the full story of a company’s

Why is Buying Group Engagement the Key to B2B Revenue?

The once-reliable image of a singular executive sitting behind a heavy mahogany desk and unilaterally signing off on a multi-million dollar contract has effectively dissolved into the ether of corporate history. In the high-stakes environment of modern commerce, a definitive “yes” rarely originates from a single office; instead, it is the hard-won result of a complex and often invisible consensus

How Is AI-Driven MarTech Redefining Modern ABM?

The high-stakes landscape of B2B sales has undergone a fundamental transformation where the ability to interpret invisible buyer intent is now more valuable than the largest possible marketing budget. In the current marketplace, the distinction between a closed deal and a missed opportunity often rests on milliseconds of data processing rather than weeks of manual research. Account-Based Marketing (ABM) has

How Does Automation Redefine the Modern DevOps Lifecycle?

The seamless orchestration of complex digital environments has evolved to a point where a single code commit can trigger a global cascade of automated events, rendering the traditional, friction-filled manual handshakes between departments entirely obsolete in the competitive high-stakes world of enterprise software delivery. Modern software engineering no longer permits the luxury of week-long deployment cycles or manual server provisioning.