Lazarus Group Exploits Undocumented Backdoor to Target Spanish Aerospace Company

The notorious North Korean threat actor, Lazarus Group, has once again made headlines with their latest cyber attack. Researchers recently discovered an undisclosed backdoor, named LightlessCan, which was employed by the Lazarus Group in a targeted attack against a prominent Spanish aerospace company. This incident is part of a wider campaign dubbed “Operation DreamJob,” which involves the use of fake job opportunities to lure unsuspecting employees. In this article, we delve into the details of this attack and explore the implications it carries for cybersecurity.

Background: The Lazarus Group and their activities

The Lazarus Group is a highly sophisticated and prolific threat actor known for carrying out cyber attacks on behalf of the North Korean regime. They have been involved in several high-profile campaigns, including the 2014 Sony Pictures Entertainment hack and the 2017 WannaCry ransomware attack. The group is primarily motivated by financial gain and gathering intelligence to support national interests.

Discovery of an Undocumented Backdoor, LightlessCan

During their investigation, security researchers at Eset stumbled upon an unknown backdoor called LightlessCan. This highly advanced tool was being used by the Lazarus Group to infiltrate the targeted Spanish aerospace company. The presence of this previously undocumented backdoor highlights the group’s evolving tactics and capabilities.

Attack Method

To launch their attack, the Lazarus Group capitalized on the allure of a dream job opportunity within the aerospace industry. They created phony LinkedIn profiles posing as recruiters to entice employees. This scheme, known as “Operation DreamJob,” allowed the attackers to establish a false sense of trust and credibility.

Payload and Malicious Actions

The attackers deployed two malicious executables, Quiz1.exe and Quiz2.exe, which were cleverly hidden within .iso images hosted on a third-party cloud storage platform. Once these executables were opened, they triggered the installation of additional payloads from the ISO images onto the victim’s system.

Description of LightlessCan

Of particular concern is the sophisticated nature of LightlessCan. This complex and potentially evolving tool provides the Lazarus Group with a wide range of capabilities, enabling them to maintain persistence, evade detection, and execute their malicious actions with precision.

Introduction of NickelLoader

The initial payload deployed by the attackers is an HTTP(S) downloader called NickelLoader. This downloader allows the adversaries to inject any desired program into the memory of the victim’s computer, enabling the execution of further malicious activities without leaving noticeable traces.

RATs and LightlessCan

NickelLoader is primarily used by attackers to deliver two types of Remote Access Trojans (RATs). The first is a variant of the BlindingCan backdoor, previously associated with the Lazarus Group. The second and more concerning RAT is the newly introduced LightlessCan, which appears to be the successor to BlindingCan.

Impact and Implications

One of the most significant implications of this attack is the attackers’ ability to greatly reduce traces of the Windows command-line programs typically used in post-compromise activities. This poses a significant challenge for real-time monitoring solutions and post-mortem digital forensic tools, making it harder to detect and investigate the attack.

The discovery of the LightlessCan backdoor and its deployment by the Lazarus Group highlights the constant evolution of cyber threats and underscores the need for organizations to remain vigilant. This attack against a Spanish aerospace company serves as a chilling reminder of the ever-present danger posed by advanced threat actors. It is crucial for organizations to implement robust security measures, provide employee education, and conduct regular threat assessments to defend against such attacks and protect sensitive information from falling into the wrong hands.

Explore more

Trend Analysis: Maritime Data Quality and Digitalization

The global shipping industry is currently grappling with a paradox where massive investments in high-end software often result in negligible improvements to the bottom line because the underlying data is essentially unreadable. For years, the narrative around maritime progress has been dominated by the allure of autonomous hulls and hyper-intelligent algorithms, yet the reality on the bridge and in the

Trend Analysis: AI Agents in ERP Workflows

The fundamental nature of enterprise resource planning is undergoing a radical transformation as the age of the passive data repository gives way to a dynamic environment where autonomous agents manage the heaviest administrative burdens. Businesses are no longer content with software that merely records what has happened; they now demand systems that anticipate needs and execute complex tasks with minimal

Why Is Finance Moving Business Central Reporting to Excel?

Finance leaders today are discovering that the rigid architecture of an enterprise resource planning system often acts more as a cage for their data than a springboard for strategic insight. While Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central serves as a formidable engine for transaction processing, many organizations are intentionally migrating their primary reporting workflows toward Microsoft Excel. This transition represents a

Dynamics GP to Business Central Migration – Review

Maintaining an aging on-premise ERP system in 2026 feels increasingly like trying to navigate a modern high-speed railway using a vintage steam engine’s schematics. For decades, Microsoft Dynamics GP, formerly known as Great Plains, served as the bedrock for mid-market American enterprises, providing a sturdy, if rigid, framework for accounting and inventory management. However, as the industry moves toward 2029—the

Why Use Statistical Accounts in Dynamics 365 Business Central?

Managing a modern enterprise requires more than just tracking the movement of dollars and cents across various general ledger accounts during a fiscal period. Financial clarity often depends on non-monetary metrics like employee headcount, physical floor space, or the total volume of customer interactions to provide context for the raw numbers. These metrics, known as statistical accounts, allow controllers to