Lack of Preparedness: UK Organizations at Risk as EU’s NIS2 Deadline Approaches

With just one year before the EU’s updated Network and Information Security Directive (NIS2) comes into force, a concerning lack of preparedness is evident among organizations in the UK, France, and Germany. NIS2 aims to address the rising cyber threats and increased reliance on digital systems, expanding its reach to encompass more industries and entities. This article explores the level of preparedness, specifically focusing on the unpreparedness in the UK, the significance of securing supply chains, potential penalties for non-compliance, the background of NIS2, its scope, compliance timelines, the importance of learning from past experiences with GDPR, and a call to action for organizations to prioritize cybersecurity preparation.

Lack of preparedness in the UK

Among the three countries surveyed, UK organizations show the lowest level of preparedness for NIS2 compliance. Shockingly, three quarters of UK organizations are yet to fully address the five key requirements for compliance outlined in NIS2. This concerning lack of readiness poses a significant risk to these organizations if they operate within the EU, necessitating immediate action to avoid potential penalties and reputational damage.

Supply chain security

According to Sailpoint’s findings, a staggering 80% of the UK organizations surveyed need to improve their supply chain security. The importance of securing supply chains cannot be understated, as they serve as potential entry points for cyber attacks and can jeopardize the overall network and information security of an organization. NIS2 places a strong emphasis on supply chain security, necessitating robust measures to protect against cyber threats.

Penalties for Non-Compliance

Failure to comply with NIS2 carries severe consequences. Organizations found in breach of the directive can face fines of up to €10 million ($10.5 million), or 2% of their global annual revenue. These penalties serve as a stark reminder of the financial repercussions associated with non-compliance. In addition to financial consequences, organizations not compliant with NIS2 risk reputational damage, loss of customer trust, and potential disruptions to their operations.

Background on NIS2

NIS2 is an updated version of the original NIS directive, which was passed in 2016 and became law in most EU member states in 2018. This update reflects the ever-increasing reliance on digital systems and addresses the evolving cyber threat landscape. NIS2 expands the scope of the directive to include a broader range of industries and entities, ensuring a more comprehensive approach to network and information security across the EU.

Scope of NIS2

NIS2 applies to organizations with over 250 employees and an annual turnover of €10 million or more. With these criteria, NIS2 encompasses a wide range of organizations, from small to large enterprises across various sectors. It is crucial for organizations falling within this scope to ensure they are compliant with NIS2 requirements to safeguard their networks, information, and overall cybersecurity posture.

Timeline for compliance

NIS2 was enacted in January 2023, signaling the start of the countdown for organizations to comply with its provisions. The deadline for member states to transpose NIS2 into their national laws is set for October 17, 2024. With just one year remaining, organizations must act swiftly and decisively to navigate the complexities of NIS2 requirements and align their cybersecurity practices accordingly.

Lessons from GDPR

The implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in 2018 served as a valuable lesson for organizations preparing for NIS2 compliance. Many organizations struggled to meet GDPR requirements and faced significant challenges in protecting personal data adequately. It is crucial not to repeat these mistakes with NIS2. Organizations should leverage the lessons learned from GDPR to enhance their cybersecurity preparedness for NIS2 and avoid potential pitfalls.

As the deadline for the EU’s NIS2 looms, organizations in the UK, France, and Germany must urgently address their lack of preparedness for compliance. With significant fines and potential reputational damage at stake, organizations need to prioritize securing their supply chains, aligning with NIS2 requirements, and investing in robust cybersecurity practices. By learning from past experiences and taking decisive action, organizations can navigate the changing cybersecurity landscape effectively and protect themselves from emerging cyber threats. The time to act is now – don’t wait until it’s too late.

Explore more

Trend Analysis: AI in Real Estate

Navigating the real estate market has long been synonymous with staggering costs, opaque processes, and a reliance on commission-based intermediaries that can consume a significant portion of a property’s value. This traditional framework is now facing a profound disruption from artificial intelligence, a technological force empowering consumers with unprecedented levels of control, transparency, and financial savings. As the industry stands

Insurtech Digital Platforms – Review

The silent drain on an insurer’s profitability often goes unnoticed, buried within the complex and aging architecture of legacy systems that impede growth and alienate a digitally native customer base. Insurtech digital platforms represent a significant advancement in the insurance sector, offering a clear path away from these outdated constraints. This review will explore the evolution of this technology from

Trend Analysis: Insurance Operational Control

The relentless pursuit of market share that has defined the insurance landscape for years has finally met its reckoning, forcing the industry to confront a new reality where operational discipline is the true measure of strength. After a prolonged period of chasing aggressive, unrestrained growth, 2025 has marked a fundamental pivot. The market is now shifting away from a “growth-at-all-costs”

AI Grading Tools Offer Both Promise and Peril

The familiar scrawl of a teacher’s red pen, once the definitive symbol of academic feedback, is steadily being replaced by the silent, instantaneous judgment of an algorithm. From the red-inked margins of yesteryear to the instant feedback of today, the landscape of academic assessment is undergoing a seismic shift. As educators grapple with growing class sizes and the demand for

Legacy Digital Twin vs. Industry 4.0 Digital Twin: A Comparative Analysis

The promise of a perfect digital replica—a tool that could mirror every gear turn and temperature fluctuation of a physical asset—is no longer a distant vision but a bifurcated reality with two distinct evolutionary paths. On one side stands the legacy digital twin, a powerful but often isolated marvel of engineering simulation. On the other is its successor, the Industry