Is Azerbaijan Manipulating French Public Debate Through Online Campaigns?

In a world where digital manipulation and disinformation campaigns are becoming increasingly common, a recent report by VIGINUM, a French government agency, has accused Azerbaijan of conducting online manipulation campaigns targeting France’s overseas constituencies and Corsica. From July 2023 to October 2024, VIGINUM detected the involvement of social media accounts linked to BIG, a known group, in spreading content hostile to France. By exploiting incidents like the May 2024 riots in New Caledonia, these campaigns attempted to sway public opinion and manipulate the narrative in favor of Azerbaijan’s foreign policy objectives.

Despite utilizing artificial amplification methods to boost their messages, these campaigns primarily involved accounts that were later suppressed by X, the platform formerly known as Twitter. After these suppressions, the group did not halt their activities but rather shifted tactics and started promoting ties with independence parties in French overseas territories and aligning with pan-African circles. These strategic changes reveal a continuous and adaptive approach in their efforts to influence public debate and undermine France’s position.

Interestingly, despite these well-planned efforts, the manipulation campaigns initiated by BIG did not manage to achieve significant visibility or impact. The content generated and spread largely failed to gain traction among the general public. The VIGINUM report concluded that BIG operates as a state propaganda outlet against France, aiming to manipulate public opinions and discussions to serve Azerbaijan’s foreign policy. This finding underscores the ongoing challenges faced by nations in the digital age, where state-sponsored disinformation campaigns can be difficult to detect and counter.

The implications of VIGINUM’s findings are crucial, as they emphasize the need for heightened vigilance and proactive measures to counter state-sponsored digital interference. Understanding the tactics and approaches used in these campaigns is essential for developing effective strategies to protect public discourse and maintain the integrity of democratic processes. While the immediate impact of Azerbaijan’s efforts may have been limited, the potential for future disinformation campaigns remains a significant concern, warranting continuous attention and preparedness.

Explore more