IBM Reports Data Breach Involving Personal Information of 631,000 People

In a recent data breach incident, IBM has reported to federal regulators that the personal information of 631,000 individuals has been compromised. The breach occurred through a technical method that allowed unauthorized access to a third-party database used by Johnson & Johnson’s patient medication support platform. This incident has raised concerns about the protection of sensitive health information and personally identifiable information.

Background on the Data Breach

IBM and Johnson & Johnson publicly disclosed the data breach last month, but it has now been posted on the Department of Health and Human Services’ HIPAA Breach Reporting Tool website. The breach is already the subject of at least two proposed federal class-action lawsuits filed against the companies. These lawsuits allege negligence on the part of IBM and Johnson & Johnson in failing to adequately protect individuals’ protected health information and personally identifiable information.

IBM’s Role and Investigation

IBM manages the application and the third-party database that supports Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen CarePath platform. This platform offers support services and resources to patients prescribed Janssen medications. During their investigation, IBM discovered unauthorized access to personal information in the database on August 2nd. Unfortunately, the full scope of the access could not be determined.

Information Potentially Compromised

The personal information that may have been compromised in this data breach includes individuals’ names, contact information, birthdates, health insurance details, and information about medications and associated conditions provided to the Janssen CarePath application. This breach raises concerns about the potential misuse or abuse of this sensitive information.

Lawsuits filed against IBM and Johnson & Johnson

The two proposed federal class-action lawsuits filed against IBM and Johnson & Johnson make similar allegations of negligence. The plaintiffs argue that the companies failed to adequately protect individuals’ sensitive information, leading to unauthorized access and potential misuse of their personal data. These lawsuits highlight the importance of robust data protection measures by organizations handling sensitive health information.

Remedial Actions by IBM

In response to the data breach, IBM is offering affected individuals one year of complimentary credit and identity monitoring. Additionally, they have collaborated with the database provider to strengthen security controls and reduce the chances of similar events occurring in the future. These measures aim to mitigate any potential harm caused by the unauthorized access to personal information.

Business associates and health data breaches

This data breach incident shines a spotlight on the ongoing issue of data breaches involving business associates and third-party vendors. It is notable that, as of Tuesday, of the 524 major health data breaches reported in 2023, about 40% involved business associates, affecting nearly 54 million individuals. This highlights the need for organizations to prioritize the security of their partnerships and ensure robust measures are implemented to protect sensitive data.

The data breach incident involving IBM and Johnson & Johnson underscores the critical need for organizations to prioritize the security and protection of sensitive health information. The breach has compromised the personal information of 631,000 individuals, raising concerns about possible misuse and the need for enhanced data protection measures. This incident, coupled with the prevalence of data breaches involving business associates, emphasizes the ongoing challenge faced by the healthcare industry in safeguarding personal information. Organizations must continue to invest in robust security protocols to ensure the confidentiality and integrity of individuals’ data.

Explore more

A Unified Framework for SRE, DevSecOps, and Compliance

The relentless demand for continuous innovation forces modern SaaS companies into a high-stakes balancing act, where a single misconfigured container or a vulnerable dependency can instantly transform a competitive advantage into a catastrophic system failure or a public breach of trust. This reality underscores a critical shift in software development: the old model of treating speed, security, and stability as

AI Security Requires a New Authorization Model

Today we’re joined by Dominic Jainy, an IT professional whose work at the intersection of artificial intelligence and blockchain is shedding new light on one of the most pressing challenges in modern software development: security. As enterprises rush to adopt AI, Dominic has been a leading voice in navigating the complex authorization and access control issues that arise when autonomous

How to Perform a Factory Reset on Windows 11

Every digital workstation eventually reaches a crossroads in its lifecycle, where persistent errors or a change in ownership demands a return to its pristine, original state. This process, known as a factory reset, serves as a definitive solution for restoring a Windows 11 personal computer to its initial configuration. It systematically removes all user-installed applications, personal data, and custom settings,

What Will Power the New Samsung Galaxy S26?

As the smartphone industry prepares for its next major evolution, the heart of the conversation inevitably turns to the silicon engine that will drive the next generation of mobile experiences. With Samsung’s Galaxy Unpacked event set for the fourth week of February in San Francisco, the spotlight is intensely focused on the forthcoming Galaxy S26 series and the chipset that

Is Leadership Fear Undermining Your Team?

A critical paradox is quietly unfolding in executive suites across the industry, where an overwhelming majority of senior leaders express a genuine desire for collaborative input while simultaneously harboring a deep-seated fear of soliciting it. This disconnect between intention and action points to a foundational weakness in modern organizational culture: a lack of psychological safety that begins not with the