How Artificial Intelligence-Driven Models Could Help Prevent Forced Evictions in the US

Forced eviction has been a significant issue impacting low-income renters in the United States for many years. Facing the threat of eviction is a devastating experience for families who are already struggling to make ends meet, with many individuals unable to secure alternative housing in a timely manner. To help address this issue, researchers from the Penn State College of Information Sciences and Technology have developed two artificial intelligence-driven models that could help promote the rights of low-income renters in the US who are facing forced eviction.

According to data from the Eviction Lab at Princeton University, there were more than 900,000 evictions in the US in 2019, affecting over 2 million people. Renters from low-income backgrounds, particularly those from underrepresented communities, are disproportionately impacted by eviction, exacerbating existing societal issues related to income disparity, educational attainment, and mental health. However, despite the magnitude of this issue, the lack of accurate data and forecasting models has hindered progress towards finding a solution.

Weakly-Supervised Aid to Reduce Nationwide Eviction Rates

The first model developed by Penn State researchers, “Weakly-Supervised Aid to Relieve Nationwide Eviction Rate,” helps identify areas where there could be a high concentration of individuals facing eviction. The model utilizes machine learning techniques, including topic modeling, text analysis, and clustering algorithms, to scour publicly available data, such as social media, news articles, court records, and government reports, and extract relevant information to provide predictions. This model can inform decision-making and resource allocation to better address eviction rates across the country.

Multi-view model forecasting the number of tenants at risk of formal eviction

The second model, “Multi-view model forecasting the number of tenants at risk of formal eviction,” aims to provide an accurate forecast of tenants at risk of eviction at a certain point in the future. This model utilizes a combination of data sources, including municipal records, governmental reports, satellite imagery, and demographic data, to generate predictions. The model also takes into account the interactions between various factors such as local rent prices, employment rates, and policy changes that could impact eviction rates in the future.

Testing the models

To test the effectiveness of their models, Penn State researchers collaborated with the Child Poverty Action Lab and applied their models to a real-world dataset in Dallas County, Texas, where eviction records are more complete and readily available. The researchers compared the accuracy of their models against existing baseline models and found that both models outperformed some of the existing models by up to 36%. These findings are significant as they demonstrate the potential of these models in helping to prevent forced evictions.

Evaluation and Deployment

Both models are currently being evaluated by subject matter experts for a pilot deployment in the field. If successful, these models could be utilized by non-governmental organizations and policymakers to make more data-driven decisions about where to allocate resources to better address housing instability. The potential for AI-driven models to assist in addressing social issues goes beyond just housing instability, and these models could help lay the groundwork for more effective solutions in other areas.

The Penn State models represent a significant step toward using AI-powered technology to address housing instability and prevent forced evictions. While there is still much to be done to address this issue in the US, the use of these models offers policymakers more accurate and informed insights into the issue and its prevalence. If deployed effectively, these models have the potential to improve the lives of the millions of low-income renters across the country who are currently facing the threat of eviction. Dongwon Lee, a professor, and co-author of the study, sums up the importance of these models, saying, “Eviction disproportionately impacts individuals from underrepresented backgrounds and can exacerbate existing societal problems related to income disparity, educational attainment, and mental health. These models can help us better address these challenges and improve the lives of those vulnerable to eviction.”

Explore more

How Is AI Closing the Gap in Customer Conversations?

The digital footprints of modern commerce often leave behind a trail of binary data, but the most profound truths about a brand’s health remain locked within the messy, emotional, and often unpredictable nuance of human speech. While organizations have spent decades perfecting the art of the post-transactional survey, they have largely ignored the goldmine of information vibrating through the phone

How Does CRM Fragmentation Drain Your Sales Productivity?

High-performing sales representatives often spend more time acting as digital detectives than closing deals because their customer data lives in ten different places at once. This digital fragmentation forces teams into a perpetual juggling act where navigating a labyrinth of browser tabs becomes the primary mode of operation. When information about a single lead is scattered across disparate platforms, preparing

How to Transform Real Estate CRMs Into High-Yield Assets

The relentless hum of a high-performance computer often masks the silent financial drain of a real estate professional’s most expensive and underutilized digital tool. Most real estate practitioners pay significant monthly fees for advanced Customer Relationship Management platforms, yet many treat these sophisticated engines like digital filing cabinets. While the technology promises to streamline operations and maximize revenue, the reality

AI Reshapes Technical Hiring and Entry-Level Pipelines

The once-reliable path of starting as a junior analyst and slowly climbing the corporate ladder has been fundamentally disrupted by the rapid integration of sophisticated autonomous systems that now manage routine tasks with superhuman speed. Hiring managers are no longer looking for people to organize spreadsheets; they are seeking architects of the future. This shift marks the definitive transition toward

AI Recruitment Tools Invent and Reinforce Their Own Biases

When a recruiting algorithm selects a candidate not because of their skills but because it hallucinated a success pattern out of thin air, the fundamental promise of meritocratic automation begins to crumble. This shift marks a departure from the era when developers merely feared that machines would inherit human prejudices; today, the concern is that they are actively manufacturing their