Evaluating ChatGPT for Software Vulnerability Tasks: A Comparative Analysis

With its impressive 1.7 trillion parameters, ChatGPT has emerged as a powerful language model. However, its applicability to code-oriented tasks, such as software vulnerability analysis and repair, remains relatively unexplored. In this article, we delve into the evaluation of ChatGPT against code-specific models, specifically examining its performance on four vulnerability tasks using the Big-Vul and CVEFixes datasets. This comprehensive analysis sheds light on the potential limitations of using ChatGPT for software vulnerability tasks while emphasizing the need for domain-specific fine-tuning.

Evaluation of ChatGPT against code-specific models

To comprehensively evaluate ChatGPT’s performance, security analysts conducted experiments using the Big-Vul and CVEFixes datasets. These datasets provide a comprehensive set of vulnerability tasks, enabling a thorough comparison of ChatGPT against baseline methods. The evaluation focused on the F1-measure and top-10 accuracy metrics.

The results of the evaluation revealed that ChatGPT achieved an F1-measure of 10% and 29% on the Big-Vul and CVEFixes datasets, respectively. These scores were significantly lower compared to the other baseline methods. Similarly, the top-10 accuracy of ChatGPT was 25% and 65%, which again reflected the lowest performance among the examined models.

Analysis of Multiclass Accuracy

In addition to F1-measure and top-10 accuracy, multiclass accuracy was also considered as a crucial performance indicator. The analysis revealed that ChatGPT achieved the lowest multiclass accuracy of 13%, showcasing a striking 45%-52% difference from the best baseline model. These outcomes underscore the challenges faced by ChatGPT in accurately classifying vulnerability tasks across multiple classes.

Evaluation of Severity Estimation

Severity estimation holds paramount importance in vulnerability analysis to prioritize remediation efforts. However, ChatGPT’s performance in this regard proved to be unsatisfactory. The evaluation indicated that ChatGPT exhibited the highest mean squared error (MSE) of 5.4 and 5.85, implying its inaccurate severity estimation compared to the other baselines. This finding raises concerns about relying on ChatGPT for precise severity estimation in vulnerability assessment.

Assessment of Repair Patch Generation

One vital aspect of vulnerability repair is the generation of correct repair patches. Regrettably, ChatGPT failed to generate accurate repair patches in this evaluation. On the other hand, the baseline models demonstrated success in rectifying vulnerable functions, correctly repairing 7% to 30% of them. This stark contrast highlights the limitations of ChatGPT in generating effective repair solutions.

Limitations of fine-tuning

Fine-tuning is a commonly employed technique to optimize language models for specific tasks. However, in the case of ChatGPT, fine-tuning for vulnerability tasks is not viable due to proprietary parameters. This constraint further underlines the challenges in adapting ChatGPT directly for software vulnerability tasks.

The Importance of Domain-specific Fine-tuning

The analysis of ChatGPT’s performance in vulnerability tasks underscores the significance of domain-specific fine-tuning. The complexity and specificity of software vulnerability tasks necessitate the customization of language models like ChatGPT to better suit the requirements. This suggests the need for further research and work on fine-tuning or adapting ChatGPT specifically for software vulnerability tasks.

Comparison with previous studies

While previous studies have examined the effectiveness of large language models in automated program repair, they have not accounted for the latest versions of ChatGPT. This article bridges that gap by shedding light on the specific performance of ChatGPT in software vulnerability tasks. Additionally, the notable disparities in results indicate the necessity for dedicated exploration of ChatGPT’s potential in this domain.

In conclusion, the evaluation of ChatGPT for software vulnerability tasks reveals its limitations in comparison to code-specific models. The lower F1-measure, top-10 accuracy, multiclass accuracy, inaccurate severity estimation, and inability to generate correct repair patches highlight the challenges faced by ChatGPT in this context. The proprietary nature of its parameters further restricts fine-tuning for vulnerability tasks. As such, this study emphasizes the need for additional research and efforts to fine-tune or tailor ChatGPT specifically for software vulnerability analysis and repair. By addressing these challenges, ChatGPT could potentially be leveraged more effectively in securing software systems in the future.

Explore more

Unlock Success with the Right CRM Model for Your Business

In today’s fast-paced business landscape, maintaining a loyal customer base is more challenging than ever, with countless tools and platforms vying for attention behind the scenes in marketing, sales, and customer service. Delivering consistent, personalized care to every client can feel like an uphill battle when juggling multiple systems and data points. This is where customer relationship management (CRM) steps

7 Steps to Smarter Email Marketing and Tech Stack Success

In a digital landscape where billions of emails flood inboxes daily, standing out is no small feat, and despite the rise of social media and instant messaging, email remains a powerhouse, delivering an average ROI of $42 for every dollar spent, according to recent industry studies. Yet, countless brands struggle to capture attention, with open rates stagnating and conversions slipping.

Why Is Employee Retention Key to Boosting Productivity?

In today’s cutthroat business landscape, a staggering reality looms over companies across the United States: losing an employee costs far more than just a vacant desk, and with turnover rates draining resources and a tightening labor market showing no signs of relief, businesses are grappling with an unseen crisis that threatens their bottom line. The hidden cost of replacing talent—often

How to Hire Your First Employee for Business Growth

Hiring the first employee represents a monumental shift for any small business owner, marking a transition from solo operations to building a team. Picture a solopreneur juggling endless tasks—client calls, invoicing, marketing, and product delivery—all while watching opportunities slip through the cracks due to a sheer lack of time. This scenario is all too common, with many entrepreneurs stretching themselves

Is Corporate Espionage the New HR Tech Battleground?

What happens when the very tools designed to simplify work turn into battlegrounds for corporate betrayal? In a stunning clash between two HR tech powerhouses, Rippling and Deel, a lawsuit alleging corporate espionage has unveiled a shadowy side of the industry. With accusations of data theft and employee poaching flying, this conflict has gripped the tech world, raising questions about