EU Raids Data Center Builders Over No-Poach Agreements

In a surprise move that has sent ripples through the tech industry, the European Commission has launched unannounced inspections targeting data center builders suspected of engaging in anti-competitive practices. Specifically, these inspections are focusing on allegations concerning no-poach agreements, where companies agree not to hire or solicit each other’s employees. These so-called “dawn raids” will see both EU officials and national competition authorities gathering substantial evidence. Violators found guilty of such agreements, prohibited under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, could face significant fines. These illicit agreements can undermine competition for skilled labor, restrict employee mobility, and inflate operational costs for clients. Although the Commission has not specified which member states or companies are under scrutiny, the move signifies a broader trend of heightened scrutiny on labor practices within the data center construction industry.

Significant Implications and Broader Concerns

The ramifications of this investigation could be profound, as companies found guilty of violating no-poach rules stand to face severe financial penalties. However, there is a silver lining for those companies that voluntarily disclose their involvement in such practices; they may receive immunity or at least reduced fines. The European Commission has sent formal information requests to other companies in the sector, expanding the scope of the investigation. Individuals aware of the anti-competitive practices can anonymously report their knowledge using the Commission’s whistle-blower tool. The broader goal behind these inspections is to ensure fair competition and protect worker mobility, indicating the EU’s firm stance on maintaining a competitive marketplace. The timeline for this open-ended investigation remains uncertain, depending largely on the complexity of each case and the level of cooperation from the involved companies.

Explore more

SHRM Faces $11.5M Verdict for Discrimination, Retaliation

When the world’s foremost authority on human resources best practices is found liable for discrimination and retaliation by a jury of its peers, it forces every business leader and HR professional to confront an uncomfortable truth. A landmark verdict against the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) serves as a stark reminder that no organization, regardless of its industry standing

What’s the Best Backup Power for a Data Center?

In an age where digital infrastructure underpins the global economy, the silent flicker of a power grid failure represents a catastrophic threat capable of bringing commerce to a standstill and erasing invaluable information in an instant. This inherent vulnerability places an immense burden on data centers, the nerve centers of modern society. For these facilities, backup power is not a

Has Phishing Overtaken Malware as a Cyber Threat?

A comprehensive analysis released by a leader in the identity threat protection sector has revealed a significant and alarming shift in the cybercriminal landscape, indicating that corporate users are now overwhelmingly the primary targets of phishing attacks over malware. The core finding, based on new data, is that an enterprise’s workforce is three times more likely to be targeted by

Samsung’s Galaxy A57 Will Outcharge The Flagship S26

In the ever-competitive smartphone market, consumers have long been conditioned to expect that a higher price tag on a flagship device guarantees superiority in every conceivable specification, from processing power to camera quality and charging speed. However, an emerging trend from one of the industry’s biggest players is poised to upend this fundamental assumption, creating a perplexing choice for prospective

Outsmart Risk With a 5-Point Data Breach Plan

The Stanford 2025 AI Index Report highlighted a significant 56.4% surge in AI-related security incidents during the previous year, encompassing everything from data breaches to sophisticated misinformation campaigns. This stark reality underscores a fundamental shift in cybersecurity: the conversation is no longer about if an organization will face a data breach, but when. In this high-stakes environment, the line between