Choosing the right ERP system is crucial for business efficiency, but common myths can lead to poor decisions. While the Request for Proposal (RFP) process is traditionally considered essential, it may not always be the best approach, especially given the similarity in technology across different platforms today. The RFP’s comprehensive nature, once helpful, may be outdated, particularly in areas like General Ledger where differences between systems are minimal. In this technologically advanced era, businesses might benefit from reevaluating the RFP’s importance and considering a new, more effective method for ERP selection that reflects the current marketplace nuances. This shift could lead to smarter investments in systems that more closely match a company’s specific needs and operational goals, without getting lost in the formality of the RFP process.
The Redundancy of RFPs
The Request for Proposal, a document once thought to be the cornerstone of prudent ERP system selection, is facing a relevance crisis. The primary argument holding the RFP process aloft is that it ensures a comprehensive comparison of potential systems, assuring a fit-for-purpose solution. Yet the truth uncovered by many industry experts is rather stark: most top-tier ERP systems’ General Ledger functions are virtually identical in capability. Hence, the painstaking activity of drafting voluminous RFPs that meticulously detail every desired feature seems redundant when discrepancies among candidates are negligible. Companies are now advised to pivot from this generic approach and aim for a more targeted method — one that zeroes in on the unique challenges and operational pain points that their ERP system must address.
Due Diligence Beyond RFP
While an RFP may not always pinpoint the best ERP system upfront, its detailed structure proves invaluable post-selection. The RFP shifts to a detailed verification tool, allowing organizations to validate that the chosen system meets every specified need. This is crucial for sidestepping the trap of vendor hype, a common occurrence where product capabilities are exaggerated during the selection stage. An RFP’s inability to weed out such overstatements initially is compensated by its utility as a post-choice audit mechanism. Hence, while its importance may wane in the initial selection, the RFP retains its significance by ensuring due diligence is thoroughly applied after a system is selected. This signifies that while traditional procurement processes are evolving, the RFP remains pivotal, albeit in a different phase of the ERP acquisition process.
Customization vs. Best-of-Breed
The debate between customizing an ERP system versus employing best-of-breed solutions is another area mired in mythology. Customization, in the sense of developing unique code, often leads to a complex, costly, and maintenance-heavy ERP ecosystem. This customization can isolate the company’s solution and create obstacles rather than efficiencies. On the other hand, selecting specialized, best-of-breed solutions that seamlessly interface with core ERP systems can provide enhanced functionality without the burdens of heavy customization. This approach not only saves time and money but also positions the business to be more agile in adopting new technological advancements as they come. By focusing on interoperability and complementary capabilities, companies can craft a more efficient and forward-looking ERP strategy that stands the test of time.
Focus on Problem-Solving
The contemporary approach to ERP system selection emphasizes solving specific business problems rather than comparing exhaustive lists of generic features. Bob Scarborough, President & CEO of Tensoft, aptly suggests that businesses should harness specialized tools that integrate efficiently with central systems, just as Tensoft’s products dovetail with Microsoft Dynamics. This shift from a feature-centric to a problem-solving selection criterion ensures that investments in ERP systems are both strategic and practical. The primary goal should be to resolve the unique challenges confronting the business with a touch of ingenuity, not to get bogged down in the mire of feature-for-feature matchups. The smarter system selection process thus champions effectiveness over extensive evaluation, articulating a clear route to operational excellence.