Dominic Jainy, a veteran IT professional with deep expertise in AI and machine learning, has watched the consumer technology landscape shift dramatically. With the industry still buzzing from the “AI PC” push of 2025, Dell’s decision to resurrect its classic XPS brand—stripped of overt AI marketing—represents a pivotal moment. We sat down with Dominic to explore the undercurrents of this strategic reversal, the enduring power of brand legacy, and what Dell’s move signals for the future of personal computing. This conversation delves into the growing “AI fatigue” among consumers, the strategic logic behind premium, fixed-configuration laptops, and the surprising return to tactile, user-friendly design in an era of digital-first interfaces.
After a major industry push for “AI PCs” last year, Dell is reviving the XPS brand with a focus on classic design. What specific consumer feedback or market data signaled this “AI fatigue,” and how might this influence other PC makers’ strategies in 2026?
The signal was less a single data point and more of a deafening silence from the market. In 2025, virtually every major PC maker was shouting about “AI PCs” and “Copilot+ PCs,” but consumers simply weren’t buying into the hype. There was a clear “lack of appetite,” as the technology felt more like a marketing label than a tangible benefit. Dell’s own COO, Jeff Clarke, admitted as much when he said, “It was obvious we needed to change.” That’s a powerful statement from a market leader. This move by Dell to get “back to our roots” is a public acknowledgment that the branding strategy failed. For 2026, other manufacturers who invested heavily in that AI-centric marketing are now in a tough spot. They’ll be watching the sales figures for these new XPS models very closely. If Dell succeeds, I expect we’ll see a rapid, industry-wide pivot back to marketing focused on performance, design, and real-world use cases, with AI features presented as a supporting benefit rather than the main event.
Dell is reintroducing the XPS brand as a distinct category alongside its newer “Pro” lines, while legacy names like Latitude remain discontinued. What makes the XPS brand equity uniquely valuable to preserve, and how is it positioned to avoid cannibalizing sales from the Pro series?
The XPS brand carries a unique cultural cachet that names like Latitude or Inspiron, for all their history, never quite achieved. For years, XPS has been synonymous with premium, high-performance, and meticulously designed Windows laptops—often seen as the closest competitor to Apple’s MacBook line in terms of build quality and user experience. It has a loyal following among creators, developers, and prosumers who value that specific blend of power and aesthetics. Preserving it was a strategic necessity. Dell is positioning it as a distinct consumer-flagship category, separate from the more business-and-enterprise-focused “Pro” branding. This clear segmentation prevents cannibalization. A customer looking for a Pro Rugged or Pro Education device has very different needs than someone drawn to the sleek, lightweight design of the XPS 14. XPS is for the individual who wants the best personal laptop, while the Pro lines are tailored for specific professional and organizational roles.
The new XPS models are offered at a high starting price with a fixed hardware configuration for CPU, memory, and storage. Could you detail the strategic thinking behind this single-SKU approach and how it impacts the balance between manufacturing efficiency and consumer choice?
This is a bold, almost Apple-like move that speaks volumes about Dell’s confidence in this product. Starting the 14-inch model at $2,050 with a powerful Intel Core Ultra x7 and 32GB of LPDDR5X memory as the baseline is a deliberate choice. From a manufacturing standpoint, a single-SKU approach is a dream. It drastically simplifies the supply chain, reduces inventory complexity, and streamlines production, which can improve margins. For the consumer, it admittedly removes choice, but it also eliminates decision paralysis. Dell is essentially curating the experience, saying, “This is the optimal configuration for a premium 2026 laptop, and we stand by it.” It’s a gamble that assumes their target audience trusts the XPS brand enough to accept this curated hardware package, valuing a simplified purchasing process over granular customization. They’re betting that the excellence of the single offering outweighs the appeal of countless configurations.
The return of physical function keys and defined touchpad borders suggests a deliberate design shift. Can you walk us through the user experience metrics or specific anecdotes that drove the decision to re-embrace these more traditional, tactile hardware features on a premium laptop?
This is a direct response to the usability issues that plagued many minimalist laptop designs over the past few years. While I don’t have Dell’s specific internal metrics, the industry-wide feedback has been clear: users miss tactile feedback. Features like capacitive touch bars or borderless touchpads, while looking sleek, often led to accidental inputs and a frustrating lack of precision. There’s a real, tangible comfort in being able to rest your fingers on the edge of a touchpad or press a physical key without looking. Bringing back physical function keys and comfortable borders isn’t a regression; it’s an admission that some traditional design elements are simply superior for the user experience. It shows a company that is listening to its users’ desire for functional, reliable tools over purely aesthetic experiments, which is a crucial part of rebuilding trust in a premium brand like XPS.
What is your forecast for the evolution of PC marketing? Will we see a continued separation from AI-centric branding, or will companies find a new, more effective way to integrate and market these features to consumers who have shown a lack of appetite so far?
My forecast is for a much smarter, more subtle integration of AI in marketing. The era of just slapping an “AI PC” sticker on the box is over; consumers have shown they see right through it. Instead of selling the abstract concept of “AI,” successful companies will market the specific, tangible benefits that AI enables. For example, they won’t say “This is an AI PC,” they’ll say, “Get up to 27 hours of battery life on a single charge thanks to intelligent power management” or “Enjoy seamless gaming with AI-boosted graphics performance.” The technology will become an invisible engine driving tangible improvements. The focus will shift from the feature itself to the user’s experience—longer battery, faster performance, smarter software. AI won’t disappear from PCs, but it will disappear from the primary marketing headlines, becoming a foundational technology that proves its worth through results, not labels.