Can 4G and 5G Investments Coexist in Vietnam’s Telecom Future?

Amid the rapid advancements in telecommunications technology, Vietnam’s approach to managing simultaneous investments in both 4G and 5G networks provides a thought-provoking scenario. This dual-focused strategy aims to balance current infrastructural needs and future innovations, ensuring customers receive optimal service while preparing for upcoming demands. Despite the ongoing rollout of 5G technology, 4G is expected to remain the dominant network at least until 2028, as it is essential to existing communication frameworks and user satisfaction. The Ministry of Information and Communications (MIC) has taken proactive steps by auctioning frequency bands designated for both 4G and 5G, with particular allocations in the 880-915 MHz and 925-960 MHz bands. These measures underscore the government’s commitment to fostering a versatile and robust telecom environment.

The Critical Role of 4G Infrastructure

Minister Nguyen Manh Hung’s indication that 5G will be commercially available nationwide by 2024 does not overshadow the substantial investments still required in 4G infrastructure. This approach underscores an acknowledgment that the next five years will see 4G continuing to play a vital role in Vietnam’s telecommunication landscape. Firms like Viettel have aggressively expanded their 4G coverage, reaching 95% of the population and setting ambitious goals to stretch this to 98% by 2025. With plans to build 7,000 new 4G base stations while enhancing existing ones, Viettel demonstrates a dual-investment approach that supports both the current and future needs of their network. Their commitment to 4G infrastructure is especially important after the shutdown of the 2G network, positioning 4G as the primary fallback and a crucial network pillar.

Similarly, VNPT has shown relentless dedication to improving both 4G and 5G technologies, with long-term aspirations to even venture into research on 6G. Their balanced strategy aims for comprehensive 4G and 5G coverage reaching 98% of the population by 2025. Targeting download speeds of 40 Mb/s for 4G and 100 Mb/s for 5G, VNPT highlights the caliber and competitiveness essential for future network infrastructure. The focus here is not just on high-speed connectivity but also on ensuring widespread coverage that enables extensive consumer access to digital services. Such broad 4G coverage is essential for maintaining customer satisfaction, particularly during the transition periods where emerging technologies like 5G are still in their nascent stages.

The Strategic Balance of 4G and 5G

Investments in 4G are not limited to major companies like Viettel and VNPT. MobiFone, another significant player in the industry, plans to build around 4,000 new 4G base stations to strengthen its network. Like its counterparts, MobiFone acknowledges the importance of investing in 4G, particularly with the ongoing phase-out of 2G. Providing strong 4G services is essential to avoid customer dissatisfaction and prevent users from switching to other providers. This focus on 4G infrastructure addresses immediate consumer demands while preparing for seamless integration of upcoming technologies.

Nguyen Phong Nha, the Deputy Director of the MIC’s Authority of Telecommunications, underscores the significance of 4G for Vietnamese telecom providers. With the phase-out of 2G and 3G, substantial investments in 4G are necessary to maintain service quality and meet increasing consumer expectations. Continuous 4G infrastructure upgrades are indispensable for providers. Telecom companies face the dual challenge of maintaining and improving their 4G networks while also preparing their 5G infrastructure for future technological and customer needs.

In summary, while 5G promises unprecedented speed and connectivity, 4G will remain essential in Vietnam’s telecom sector for years. Telecom providers must balance the two, ensuring they meet current demands while planning for future innovations. This balanced approach shows a deep understanding of the telecom industry’s complexities and diverse consumer needs.

Explore more

AI and Generative AI Transform Global Corporate Banking

The high-stakes world of global corporate finance has finally severed its ties to the sluggish, paper-heavy traditions of the past, replacing the clatter of manual data entry with the silent, lightning-fast processing of neural networks. While the industry once viewed artificial intelligence as a speculative luxury confined to the periphery of experimental “innovation labs,” it has now matured into the

Is Auditability the New Standard for Agentic AI in Finance?

The days when a financial analyst could be mesmerized by a chatbot simply generating a coherent market summary have vanished, replaced by a rigorous demand for structural transparency. As financial institutions pivot from experimental generative models to autonomous agents capable of managing liquidity and executing trades, the “wow factor” has been eclipsed by the cold reality of production-grade requirements. In

How to Bridge the Execution Gap in Customer Experience

The modern enterprise often functions like a sophisticated supercomputer that possesses every piece of relevant information about a customer yet remains fundamentally incapable of addressing a simple inquiry without requiring the individual to repeat their identity multiple times across different departments. This jarring reality highlights a systemic failure known as the execution gap—a void where multi-million dollar investments in marketing

Trend Analysis: AI Driven DevSecOps Orchestration

The velocity of software production has reached a point where human intervention is no longer the primary driver of development, but rather the most significant bottleneck in the security lifecycle. As generative tools produce massive volumes of functional code in seconds, the traditional manual review process has effectively crumbled under the weight of machine-generated output. This shift has created a

Navigating Kubernetes Complexity With FinOps and DevOps Culture

The rapid transition from static virtual machine environments to the fluid, containerized architecture of Kubernetes has effectively rewritten the rules of modern infrastructure management. While this shift has empowered engineering teams to deploy at an unprecedented velocity, it has simultaneously introduced a layer of financial complexity that traditional billing models are ill-equipped to handle. As organizations navigate the current landscape,