Are Monolithic Blockchains Overtaking Ethereum in 2024?

The performance of monolithic blockchains throughout September 2024 demonstrates their notable advantages over modular blockchains, particularly in transaction throughput, suggesting a potential shift in the blockchain landscape. Monolithic blockchains integrate various layers into a single, unified architecture, enhancing performance and efficiency. Among these blockchains, Solana, Sui, and Aptos have emerged as top performers. Solana saw a 14% increase, while Sui and Aptos gained an impressive 118% and 23%, respectively, during September. These substantial gains highlight the increasing prominence and viability of monolithic blockchains as contenders in the market traditionally dominated by Ethereum.

Sui’s meteoric rise in value was significantly driven by a remarkable 140% surge in daily active addresses, propelling its market capitalization above $5 billion. Similarly, Aptos experienced a 30% increase in daily active addresses, mainly attributed to the Raptr software upgrade. According to VanEck’s report, these gains underline the growing interest in monolithic blockchains, often referred to as "Ethereum killers" because of their superior throughput and lower transaction costs. This shift suggests not just technological advancements but also a changing market sentiment that favors more efficient blockchain solutions.

Advantages of Monolithic Blockchains

Monolithic blockchains like Solana have been compared to Apple’s macOS in terms of their vertically integrated protocol, which combines both software and hardware development. This cohesive structure allows for faster and cheaper transactions, making these blockchains particularly attractive for applications involving small payments, asset tokenization, and NFT minting. Sygnum Bank’s report further emphasizes that the reduction in transaction costs and times enhances Solana’s credibility as a practical payment network. This level of efficiency presents a significant threat to Ethereum’s market dominance, as users are increasingly drawn to these newer, more agile blockchain solutions.

The migration from Ethereum to these newer layer-1 competitors has been substantial throughout 2024, significantly impacting Ethereum’s price and market share. Early October saw Ethereum’s price drop by 12%, and it has been trading below its 200-day exponential moving average since August 2024. This decline is especially concerning for Ethereum given its longstanding dominance in the blockchain ecosystem. The primary drivers for this shift are identified as speculation and the appeal of lower transaction costs available on monolithic blockchains like Solana and Sui. This trend indicates a growing preference for more efficient and cost-effective blockchain platforms, reinforcing the competitive edge of monolithic blockchains.

Technology and Market Dynamics

The performance of monolithic blockchains throughout September 2024 illustrates their significant advantages over modular ones, especially in transaction throughput, hinting at a potential shift in the blockchain landscape. Monolithic blockchains unify various layers into a single architecture, boosting performance and efficiency. Solana, Sui, and Aptos have emerged as top performers in this category. Solana saw a 14% increase, while Sui and Aptos gained an impressive 118% and 23%, respectively, highlighting the growing prominence of monolithic blockchains in a market traditionally dominated by Ethereum.

Sui’s astronomical rise in value was driven largely by a 140% surge in daily active addresses, which pushed its market capitalization above $5 billion. Similarly, Aptos saw a 30% increase in daily active addresses, primarily due to the Raptr software upgrade. VanEck’s report indicates these gains underscore the growing interest in monolithic blockchains, often termed "Ethereum killers" for their superior throughput and lower transaction costs. This evolution points to not just technological advancements but also a shifting market sentiment favoring more efficient blockchain solutions.

Explore more

AI and Generative AI Transform Global Corporate Banking

The high-stakes world of global corporate finance has finally severed its ties to the sluggish, paper-heavy traditions of the past, replacing the clatter of manual data entry with the silent, lightning-fast processing of neural networks. While the industry once viewed artificial intelligence as a speculative luxury confined to the periphery of experimental “innovation labs,” it has now matured into the

Is Auditability the New Standard for Agentic AI in Finance?

The days when a financial analyst could be mesmerized by a chatbot simply generating a coherent market summary have vanished, replaced by a rigorous demand for structural transparency. As financial institutions pivot from experimental generative models to autonomous agents capable of managing liquidity and executing trades, the “wow factor” has been eclipsed by the cold reality of production-grade requirements. In

How to Bridge the Execution Gap in Customer Experience

The modern enterprise often functions like a sophisticated supercomputer that possesses every piece of relevant information about a customer yet remains fundamentally incapable of addressing a simple inquiry without requiring the individual to repeat their identity multiple times across different departments. This jarring reality highlights a systemic failure known as the execution gap—a void where multi-million dollar investments in marketing

Trend Analysis: AI Driven DevSecOps Orchestration

The velocity of software production has reached a point where human intervention is no longer the primary driver of development, but rather the most significant bottleneck in the security lifecycle. As generative tools produce massive volumes of functional code in seconds, the traditional manual review process has effectively crumbled under the weight of machine-generated output. This shift has created a

Navigating Kubernetes Complexity With FinOps and DevOps Culture

The rapid transition from static virtual machine environments to the fluid, containerized architecture of Kubernetes has effectively rewritten the rules of modern infrastructure management. While this shift has empowered engineering teams to deploy at an unprecedented velocity, it has simultaneously introduced a layer of financial complexity that traditional billing models are ill-equipped to handle. As organizations navigate the current landscape,