Are Monolithic Blockchains Overtaking Ethereum in 2024?

The performance of monolithic blockchains throughout September 2024 demonstrates their notable advantages over modular blockchains, particularly in transaction throughput, suggesting a potential shift in the blockchain landscape. Monolithic blockchains integrate various layers into a single, unified architecture, enhancing performance and efficiency. Among these blockchains, Solana, Sui, and Aptos have emerged as top performers. Solana saw a 14% increase, while Sui and Aptos gained an impressive 118% and 23%, respectively, during September. These substantial gains highlight the increasing prominence and viability of monolithic blockchains as contenders in the market traditionally dominated by Ethereum.

Sui’s meteoric rise in value was significantly driven by a remarkable 140% surge in daily active addresses, propelling its market capitalization above $5 billion. Similarly, Aptos experienced a 30% increase in daily active addresses, mainly attributed to the Raptr software upgrade. According to VanEck’s report, these gains underline the growing interest in monolithic blockchains, often referred to as "Ethereum killers" because of their superior throughput and lower transaction costs. This shift suggests not just technological advancements but also a changing market sentiment that favors more efficient blockchain solutions.

Advantages of Monolithic Blockchains

Monolithic blockchains like Solana have been compared to Apple’s macOS in terms of their vertically integrated protocol, which combines both software and hardware development. This cohesive structure allows for faster and cheaper transactions, making these blockchains particularly attractive for applications involving small payments, asset tokenization, and NFT minting. Sygnum Bank’s report further emphasizes that the reduction in transaction costs and times enhances Solana’s credibility as a practical payment network. This level of efficiency presents a significant threat to Ethereum’s market dominance, as users are increasingly drawn to these newer, more agile blockchain solutions.

The migration from Ethereum to these newer layer-1 competitors has been substantial throughout 2024, significantly impacting Ethereum’s price and market share. Early October saw Ethereum’s price drop by 12%, and it has been trading below its 200-day exponential moving average since August 2024. This decline is especially concerning for Ethereum given its longstanding dominance in the blockchain ecosystem. The primary drivers for this shift are identified as speculation and the appeal of lower transaction costs available on monolithic blockchains like Solana and Sui. This trend indicates a growing preference for more efficient and cost-effective blockchain platforms, reinforcing the competitive edge of monolithic blockchains.

Technology and Market Dynamics

The performance of monolithic blockchains throughout September 2024 illustrates their significant advantages over modular ones, especially in transaction throughput, hinting at a potential shift in the blockchain landscape. Monolithic blockchains unify various layers into a single architecture, boosting performance and efficiency. Solana, Sui, and Aptos have emerged as top performers in this category. Solana saw a 14% increase, while Sui and Aptos gained an impressive 118% and 23%, respectively, highlighting the growing prominence of monolithic blockchains in a market traditionally dominated by Ethereum.

Sui’s astronomical rise in value was driven largely by a 140% surge in daily active addresses, which pushed its market capitalization above $5 billion. Similarly, Aptos saw a 30% increase in daily active addresses, primarily due to the Raptr software upgrade. VanEck’s report indicates these gains underscore the growing interest in monolithic blockchains, often termed "Ethereum killers" for their superior throughput and lower transaction costs. This evolution points to not just technological advancements but also a shifting market sentiment favoring more efficient blockchain solutions.

Explore more

The Institutional Layer Drives Global AI Innovation

Technological history demonstrates that writing massive checks for research often fails to ignite industrial revolutions when the structural plumbing required to move ideas from whiteboards to production lines remains broken or nonexistent. In the current global race for artificial intelligence supremacy, nations are pouring trillions of dollars into compute clusters and research grants, yet the mere accumulation of capital does

Human Curation Prevents AI Customer Service Failures

The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence into the front lines of customer support has frequently resulted in a series of highly publicized and embarrassing technological hallucinations that could have been avoided with proper human oversight. As enterprises move deeper into 2026, the initial novelty of automated chatbots has been replaced by a rigorous demand for reliability and accuracy that

Is Customer Experience the New Search Engine Optimization?

Digital landscapes have transformed so radically that a perfectly optimized website no longer guarantees a single visitor if the underlying service fails to impress the silent algorithms watching every interaction. In the current marketplace, the meticulous curation of meta tags and backlink profiles has surrendered its dominance to a much more elusive and human metric: the lived experience of the

Can a Fiduciary Framework Secure Government Data and AI?

The startling collapse of confidence among state-level cybersecurity leaders reveals that the traditional philosophy of building taller digital walls around centralized government data repositories has reached a breaking point. Currently, the landscape of public sector data management is undergoing a severe identity crisis. While technological capabilities have expanded exponentially, the ability of state agencies to safeguard the very information that

Unifying File and Object Storage Solves AI Data Bottlenecks

The relentless appetite of modern GPU clusters has transformed storage from a background utility into a critical performance governor that determines the success of enterprise artificial intelligence initiatives. While raw compute power continues to scale at an impressive rate, the infrastructure responsible for feeding these hungry processors remains mired in architectural silos. This mismatch has birthed the paradox of the