Apple to Restrict Charging Speeds to Certified Cables, Despite Adopting USB-C

Apple has been in the headlines recently for its plans to adopt USB-C for its next iPhone range. Reports have been circulating for months about the tech giant’s move towards the standardization of connectivity formats that are increasingly favored by other manufacturers. However, a more recent development has sparked debate among iPhone enthusiasts.

According to sources, Apple is looking to restrict its best charging speeds to certified cables. The limitations apply to all cable types, including those containing USB-C connectors, which are becoming ever more prevalent across the tech industry. So despite adopting USB-C for its next iPhone range and conceding to new regulations aimed at standardizing mobile device charging cables, Apple is still going to do things on its own terms.

Ming-Chi Kuo’s suggestions

Ming-Chi Kuo is a renowned Apple analyst who has provided insight into the company’s plans for its upcoming products. According to Kuo, while faster iPhone charging will be possible through optimization, it will only work when a plug or cable carries the MFi (Made for iPhone) tick of approval. This development means that even if you own another device capable of providing faster charging speeds, it will only be unlocked if it is Apple-certified.

Current charging speeds of iPhone models

As it stands, the iPhone 14 and 14 Plus already support a charging speed of up to 20W. This differs from the Pro models as they have a charging speed of up to 27W. This leaves users waiting quite some time to fully charge their device if they are using a non-certified cable. The good news is that there are Apple-certified cables available that allow fast charging speeds. However, it’s worth noting that these are usually more expensive than third-party alternatives.

Apple’s restrictions on third-party cables

Apple has had restrictions on third-party cables and other unauthorized accessories in place for several years. Though this might be inconvenient for some users who would rather save money by buying cheaper alternatives, these limitations provide safety measures for Apple device users. In the past, many instances have occurred where cheap knock-off chargers caused safety hazards, such as electrocution, fires, or even explosions. By having restrictions in place, Apple ensures that users only use MFi-certified products, which guarantees safety and reliability.

Apple’s Response to EU Standardisation Ruling

After years of consultation and speculation, the European Parliament passed a law at the end of last year which requires all tech manufacturers to ensure that mobile and portable devices released from the end of 2024 use USB-C for charging. The aim of this law is to standardize the format so that users only need one charger and cable for multiple devices, be it a camera, handheld game console, phone, or tablet.

After initial reservations about the ruling, Apple confirmed in a press statement that it will switch to USB-C for its devices. This move was welcomed by many users and mobile tech enthusiasts who seek a universal charging cable that they can always rely on.

In conclusion, although Apple has agreed to embrace USB-C for its new line of iPhones, the company still aims to have control over their terms. These terms include the use of certified cables and accessories for users to take full advantage of its fast charging technology. Users should be mindful of Apple’s restrictions on charging speeds and third-party cables if they plan on using non-certified products, as these can come with the risk of damaging your device, uneven charging, or even potential safety hazards. While industry standards for mobile device charging seem to be on the horizon, only time will tell how the market will evolve.

Explore more

ERP Systems Shift From Bolt-On to AI-Native Architecture

The traditional enterprise resource planning market has recently crossed a significant threshold where the superficial application of artificial intelligence no longer suffices for complex industrial operations. By 2026, a distinct divide has emerged between legacy platforms that merely retrofitted AI features onto old code and those built from the ground up for the modern era. This evolution is changing how

How Will XRP and Ethereum Define the 2026 Crypto Market?

The transformation of the cryptocurrency market from a speculative frontier into a foundational pillar of the global financial system has fundamentally reshaped how institutions and retail investors perceive digital assets. Today, the landscape is defined by clear regulatory frameworks and significant participation from major banking institutions, moving away from the volatility of previous cycles toward a more professionalized environment. Within

Is Workplace Abuse Behind the Climate Official’s Death?

The sudden passing of a senior director within the international climate policy framework has sent shockwaves through the scientific community and raised urgent questions about the psychological toll of high-pressure public service roles. While initial reports focused on health complications resulting from chronic stress, subsequent leaks of internal emails and whistleblower testimonies suggested a disturbing reality of systematic bullying and

Is the Future of the Linux Desktop Atomic?

The Linux desktop has undergone a radical transformation as the community moves away from the fragile, manual configuration methods of the past toward a much more resilient, image-based future. For several decades, the quintessential Linux experience was defined by a fundamental paradox where users enjoyed unparalleled control over their environment while simultaneously facing a constant risk of catastrophic system failure

Proactive Layered Strategies Neutralize Ransomware Threats

The persistent threat of digital extortion has transformed from a rare occurrence into an unavoidable reality that demands a fundamental shift in how individuals approach their computer’s security landscape. Relying solely on the hope that a system will remain unnoticed by malicious actors is no longer a viable strategy in an environment where automated exploitation tools are constantly scanning for