Apple to Restrict Charging Speeds to Certified Cables, Despite Adopting USB-C

Apple has been in the headlines recently for its plans to adopt USB-C for its next iPhone range. Reports have been circulating for months about the tech giant’s move towards the standardization of connectivity formats that are increasingly favored by other manufacturers. However, a more recent development has sparked debate among iPhone enthusiasts.

According to sources, Apple is looking to restrict its best charging speeds to certified cables. The limitations apply to all cable types, including those containing USB-C connectors, which are becoming ever more prevalent across the tech industry. So despite adopting USB-C for its next iPhone range and conceding to new regulations aimed at standardizing mobile device charging cables, Apple is still going to do things on its own terms.

Ming-Chi Kuo’s suggestions

Ming-Chi Kuo is a renowned Apple analyst who has provided insight into the company’s plans for its upcoming products. According to Kuo, while faster iPhone charging will be possible through optimization, it will only work when a plug or cable carries the MFi (Made for iPhone) tick of approval. This development means that even if you own another device capable of providing faster charging speeds, it will only be unlocked if it is Apple-certified.

Current charging speeds of iPhone models

As it stands, the iPhone 14 and 14 Plus already support a charging speed of up to 20W. This differs from the Pro models as they have a charging speed of up to 27W. This leaves users waiting quite some time to fully charge their device if they are using a non-certified cable. The good news is that there are Apple-certified cables available that allow fast charging speeds. However, it’s worth noting that these are usually more expensive than third-party alternatives.

Apple’s restrictions on third-party cables

Apple has had restrictions on third-party cables and other unauthorized accessories in place for several years. Though this might be inconvenient for some users who would rather save money by buying cheaper alternatives, these limitations provide safety measures for Apple device users. In the past, many instances have occurred where cheap knock-off chargers caused safety hazards, such as electrocution, fires, or even explosions. By having restrictions in place, Apple ensures that users only use MFi-certified products, which guarantees safety and reliability.

Apple’s Response to EU Standardisation Ruling

After years of consultation and speculation, the European Parliament passed a law at the end of last year which requires all tech manufacturers to ensure that mobile and portable devices released from the end of 2024 use USB-C for charging. The aim of this law is to standardize the format so that users only need one charger and cable for multiple devices, be it a camera, handheld game console, phone, or tablet.

After initial reservations about the ruling, Apple confirmed in a press statement that it will switch to USB-C for its devices. This move was welcomed by many users and mobile tech enthusiasts who seek a universal charging cable that they can always rely on.

In conclusion, although Apple has agreed to embrace USB-C for its new line of iPhones, the company still aims to have control over their terms. These terms include the use of certified cables and accessories for users to take full advantage of its fast charging technology. Users should be mindful of Apple’s restrictions on charging speeds and third-party cables if they plan on using non-certified products, as these can come with the risk of damaging your device, uneven charging, or even potential safety hazards. While industry standards for mobile device charging seem to be on the horizon, only time will tell how the market will evolve.

Explore more

Warehouse Picking Optimization – Review

The relentless acceleration of global supply chains has transformed the warehouse picking process from a simple logistical task into a complex exercise in data synchronization and operational precision. Warehouse picking optimization is no longer a luxury for large-scale distributors but a fundamental requirement for any organization aiming to maintain relevance in a competitive market. This technology represents a convergence of

How Is AI and Low-Code Automation Transforming Modern ERP?

The traditional method of viewing enterprise resource planning systems as mere repositories for historical financial data has become a significant hindrance to organizational growth in a market that demands instantaneous responses. For many decades, these platforms served as digital file cabinets, operating as passive systems of record where information was deposited and then left dormant until a human operator performed

Aligning Dynamics 365 Business Central with CMMC Standards

A single misconfigured permission or an overlooked data residency requirement in a financial system can instantly disqualify a defense contractor from the very federal awards they have spent years pursuing. Business Central stands as a favorite for modernizing operations, yet its position within the Microsoft ecosystem requires careful alignment with the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC). This oversight creates a

How Can On-Time Delivery Reporting Improve Business Central?

The silence of a busy warehouse often masks the digital chaos of unfulfilled promises that eventually erupt into frantic calls from disappointed clients who expected their goods yesterday. This disconnect occurs because many enterprises treat the moment a package leaves the loading dock as the primary metric of success, ignoring the intricate milestones that lead toward a successful customer outcome.

Closing the Gap Between Coding Speed and Finance Outcomes

While a specialized developer can now generate a complex extension for an ERP system within minutes, the finance department often waits weeks for that same solution to reach production. This frustrating delay highlights a growing disconnect between technical agility and business readiness. In modern software environments, the ability to write code has far outpaced the ability to verify it, leaving